Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

ITS Plant Coverage

未关闭
#2 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
25/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
需要澄清
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
r

调研方向

Start by locating the complete species list, sequence reads file, OTU-Taxon linker file, and any existing voucher or TrnL/ITS analysis. Work through each checklist question, including the proposed ITS OTU-Taxon linker and BLAST comparison. Done means the requested counts, flagged shared OTUs, and candidate external sequences are documented.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

  • How many voucher species from that list have had TrnL run

  • How many have a "good" ITS read?

  • How many species on the complete species list do we find being identified in the poop samples that we do not have vouchers for (i.e. they are identified at the species level in the sequence reads file)

  • How many species from our complete list have a ITS sequence in the OTU-Taxon linker file but the sequence is identical to other species? (this one will require us to create a ITS OTU-Taxon linker)

  • For species with a OTUID that is shared with other species in the OTU-Taxon Linker, is there only one species from our site in that group? (i.e. do we feel like we could assign that OTU to one of our species as a flagged low-quality DNA sequence)?

  • Check our species list against BLAST, are there high quality sequences in the database that we could add to ours with a source flag to indicate that we did not run a voucher speciment but are "latin name" matching with BLAST?

主要语言
R
星标
0
派生
1
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

环境准备

这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南,环境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

weecology/Metabarcoding 的其他 Issue

查看 weecology/Metabarcoding 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 R Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。