bug: get_run_details has returned a non-progressing zero-limit cursor since PR #3224

未关闭 适合新手
  • 哪里不对？
#4,733 4 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

@AbhayPratap01 已经在做这个了。

开始于 2026年8月25日。

评估

难度
2/5
预计耗时
1-3 小时
新手友好度
68/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
typescript
领域
api

调研方向

从 packages/cli-v3/src/mcp/schemas.ts（GetRunDetailsInput，maxTraceLines 没有最小值）以及 packages/cli-v3/src/mcp/tools/runs.ts 开始，其中 readLinesPage 将 nextCursor 计算为 offset + limit。为该 schema 添加正整数约束，并在 readLinesPage 中添加防御性检查，使零值/负值的 limit 要么报错，要么返回一个前进的 cursor。使用现有的 cli-v3 MCP 工具测试进行验证，添加 maxTraceLines 为 0、负值和 1 的用例，以确认 nextCursor 从 "0" 递进到 "1"。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Provide environment information

System:
  OS: macOS 26.5.2
  CPU: (10) arm64 Apple M4
  Memory: 1.82 GB / 16.00 GB
  Shell: 5.9 - /bin/zsh
Binaries:
  Node: 24.19.0
  npm: 11.7.0
  pnpm: 11.19.0
  bun: 1.3.14
Trigger.dev:
  CLI and SDK: 4.5.11
  MCP transport: stdio
  Flags: --dev-only --readonly
  Environment: dev

Describe the bug

The MCP get_run_details tool accepts maxTraceLines: 0 and reports a
successful empty page with nextCursor: "0". Following that cursor requests
the same page again, so pagination cannot advance.

I found this while testing Trigger.dev's MCP surface with an internal agent
compatibility system at Bottomless. The reproduction is model-free and uses a
dedicated benchmark dev project.

Expected behavior: reject a page size below one, or return a cursor that
advances.

Actual behavior:

Run Trace (lines 1-0 of 43)
More trace available.
nextCursor: "0"

To reproduce

  1. Start the official Trigger.dev MCP for a project that has a completed dev
    run.
  2. Call get_run_details for that run with maxTraceLines: 0.
  3. Observe that the call succeeds, reports lines 1-0, and returns cursor
    "0" while saying more trace is available.
  4. Call the tool again with cursor "0"; it returns the same page.

Reduced arguments:

{
  "projectRef": "<project-ref>",
  "environment": "dev",
  "runId": "<completed-run-id>",
  "maxTraceLines": 0
}

A control call with maxTraceLines: 1 returns lines 1-1 and cursor "1".

Additional information

I traced the behavior through Main history. The non-progressing cursor path was
introduced by PR #3224,
feat(cli): Expand and improve the MCP server and dev CLI command, merged on
March 17, 2026 at commit
dbbe9f77f953ad7a8306e48d7bd1107e3f8d3ba2.

Before that PR, maxTraceLines existed but get_run_details did not return a
cursor. PR #3224 added cursor pagination while leaving the zero value valid.
Its new readLinesPage function computed nextCursor as offset + limit, so
a zero limit returned the same cursor indefinitely.

The schema still accepted every integer when I rechecked Main on August 20,
2026 at 447471843cbe7759f64beb616d5db5f05696ea13, because maxTraceLines has
no minimum:

https://github.com/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev/blob/447471843cbe7759f64beb616d5db5f05696ea13/packages/cli-v3/src/mcp/schemas.ts#L146-L160

The same cursor calculation also remains on current Main:

https://github.com/triggerdotdev/trigger.dev/blob/447471843cbe7759f64beb616d5db5f05696ea13/packages/cli-v3/src/mcp/tools/runs.ts#L35-L52

Suggested change: require a positive integer in GetRunDetailsInput, add a
defensive positive-limit check in readLinesPage, and cover zero/negative
limits plus a one-line positive case in tests.

The live check had zero invalid cases, unchanged fixture state, and verified
cleanup. Searches of existing issues and PRs found no matching report. This is
an MCP response-contract issue, not a security report.

We are testing a system at Bottomless that runs repeatable MCP contract and
workflow checks, verifies the observed behavior directly, and can replay the
same checks when an MCP changes. We are trying to learn whether MCP teams would
want checks like this on future pull requests or releases. Would that be useful
to your team?

If useful, I can look into a focused regression test and fix, then rerun the
same check.

主要语言
TypeScript
星标
16.5k
派生
1.5k
平均合并
1 天 15 小时
30 天内合并 PR
17

环境准备

这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南，环境需要你自己搭建：先看它的 README，通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

triggerdotdev/trigger.dev 的其他 Issue

查看 triggerdotdev/trigger.dev 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 TypeScript Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。