POST: open source impoverishment
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 新手友好度
- 15/100
- Issue 类型
- 文档
- 描述清晰度
- 需要澄清
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 领域
- content
调研方向
未指定文件、测试或入口点，且该 issue 未定义具体的内容变更。首先明确 Docusaurus/Markdown 网站应发布文章还是修改现有材料，确定目标页面，并在开始前就验收标准达成一致；无法根据当前 issue 判断是否完成。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
What are the benefits of open source software or free, libre and open source software?
If open source is defined by licensing, then the biggest win of open source has been to move legalese and legal discussion about software licensing to the background.
The essence of open source licensing has been to remove most of the friction about legales from software development.
I can talk about MIT, BSD or GPL and with each of these three letters, you know what licensing terms I am talking about. In contrast, a commercial contract or an unknown license will require legal review.
As a dev, I can make quick policy-aligned decision about whether or not I can reuse a piece of code with these few letters.
But a new generation of programmers wants to revisit this well established community status quo.
To them, developers do not care about "open source" as defined by the OSI or the FSF, and only a few old activist guys with backward ideas care for that.
And they are coming with new FUBAR fauxpensource licenses that erode and impoverish the discourse about software licenses, bringing legalese back to the forefront.
The sad thing is that these thrive on confusion and often present to be open source and use license that look like open source licenses, deceiving developers that cannot grasp all the minute details of legal shenanigans.
So this is a plea for open source licensing clarity, against things that look like but are not open source:
- Commercial licenses are fine.
- Open source and free and open source licenses are great.
- Proprietary and source available licenses based on confusing, open source-like terms that are trying to ride the coattails of FOSS goodwill with deception are a terrible poison pill.
Let's get rid of these.
- 主要语言
- JavaScript
- 星标
- 9
- 派生
- 17
- 平均合并
- 7 小时 55 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 2
环境准备
这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南，环境需要你自己搭建：先看它的 README，通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
aboutcode-org/www.aboutcode.org 的其他 Issue
-
Making all post button.可能已有人在做 @sarthaklole 于 70 天前认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
aboutcode-org/www.aboutcode.org#117 · 3 条评论 ·
-
WWW: Reduce frequency of update-releases可能重新可做 @johnmhoran 于 51 天前认领，目前没有进行中的 PR。 未关闭ci-workflow
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 45/100
aboutcode-org/www.aboutcode.org#180 · 已指派 1 人 ·
-
DOCS: Create new AboutCode stack diagram(s)可能重新可做 @hixvikas 于 53 天前认领，目前没有进行中的 PR。 未关闭documentation
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 35/100
aboutcode-org/www.aboutcode.org#166 · 1 条评论 ·
-
WWW: Create About top level page?可能已有人在做 @pombredanne 于 154 天前认领。 未关闭website
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 35/100
aboutcode-org/www.aboutcode.org#164 · 1 个 reaction · 已指派 1 人 ·
-
WWW: Add Initiatives and grant Projects可能重新可做 @mjherzog 于 241 天前认领，目前没有进行中的 PR。 未关闭enhancement needs design website
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 25/100
aboutcode-org/www.aboutcode.org#141 · 已指派 1 人 ·
查看 aboutcode-org/www.aboutcode.org 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
ai-driven-fuzzing bug claude Minor
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
linagora/cozy-client#1777 · 1 条评论 · 1 个 reaction ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
[guide] AGENTS.md claims the coverage gate, e2e and full lint run on every PR after ADR 0011 focused validation可能已有人在做 @hivecommons-hive 今天认领。 未关闭agent/guide documentation hive/claimed-by-guide stage/040-covered-by-pr
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 81/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
check:passed feeds:add
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 65/100
维护者通常 4 天内回复
-
CMS video element: "CmsVideoPlugin" sets `volume = 0`, so videos cannot be unmuted on Android Chrome未关闭needs-triage Platform(Default)
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
all-contributors/cli#587 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复