Jump-to-definition doesn't work on not-zipped source archives.
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- typescript, vscode
- Domain
- devtools
Research direction
Start by tracing how the zipped-archive DefinitionProvider is registered and how database add/delete events are handled. Compare the proposed per-database registration with a broadly applicable provider; done means jump-to-definition works for LGTM databases without running database cleanup.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Databases from LGTM are built with odasa rather than codeql, and so don't have zipped source archives, and require an extra codeql database cleanup step to zip the source archive before jump-to-definition works on them.
It would be nice in principle if it just worked out of the box. With the current strategy of making one DefinitionProvider for the zipped archive scheme, it doesn't seem possible. We could perhaps, for each database add and delete, register and unregister a DefinitionProvider with an absolute file path pattern matching files in that database's source archive. Alternatively it might be the case that registering a broadly applicable DefinitionProvider isn't harmful as long as it simply returns zero results when another DefinitionProvider also exists.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 539
- Forks
- 240
- Avg merge
- 2d 6h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 29
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from github/vscode-codeql
-
bug VSCode
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
github/vscode-codeql#4471 · 1 comment ·
-
bug enhancement VSCode
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
github/vscode-codeql#592 · 2 comments ·
-
enhancement VSCode
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 55/100
github/vscode-codeql#4432 · 1 comment ·
-
bug VSCode
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 52/100
github/vscode-codeql#4356 ·
-
bug VSCode
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 64/100
github/vscode-codeql#4339 · 1 comment ·
All issues in github/vscode-codeql
Similar issues
-
enhancement
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
dennys-bd/agent-hive#184 ·
-
Add: hunch Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
AbdelStark/awesome-typesafe#104 ·
-
ai-observability bug team/ai-observability
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
vicharanashala/fln#563 ·