Give find and resolve coherent configuration snapshots without lock-held discovery
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 25/100
- Tipo de issue
- Refactorización
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- rust
- Área
- api, backend, documentation, performance, testing-qa
Línea de trabajo
Start with the configure, resolve, and find sections in crates/pet/src/jsonrpc.rs and the refresh-state contract in docs/LOCATOR_STATE.md; review #531 metrics and the #533 concurrency workload first. Define and test coherent old-or-new snapshots without holding configuration locks during filesystem or subprocess I/O. Done means the listed barrier, ordering, failure, refresh, cache, latency, and documentation criteria pass without regressing #385 or #461.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Tracking plan: #528
Priority: P2. Evidence: source-confirmed ownership inconsistency; add deterministic race tests before claiming a reproduced user failure.
Problem
Refresh uses a transient locator graph and a configuration-generation snapshot. Find/resolve still use the long-lived shared graph while configure mutates its locators one by one before publishing the new generation. Those operations can therefore observe partially applied configuration even though refresh has a coherent boundary.
Additionally, find passes a chained configuration read/clone expression directly into discovery; the temporary read guard can live through that call, retaining the configuration lock during filesystem work.
Sources: configure prepare/mutate/publish, resolve, find, refresh-state contract.
Scope
- First make find's configuration snapshot an explicit local value and release its guard before discovery.
- Define one coherent request-snapshot boundary for configure/refresh/find/resolve. Prefer constructing the replacement configuration/locator graph off-lock and atomically publishing it, rather than extending broad locks across I/O.
- Separate deliberately shared performance caches from configured input and correctness-critical discovery state. Preserve current generation-gated notifications, locator ordering, scoped refresh-state sync, and coalescing semantics.
- Replace unnecessary mutable-graph rollback complexity only where the new ownership model demonstrably removes the failure mode; do not bundle unrelated rewrites.
Acceptance criteria
- Barrier/channel-driven tests prove find and resolve see either the old or new configuration, never a mix across locators.
- Slow discovery/configuration fixtures do not hold a global configuration lock over filesystem or subprocess I/O.
- Concurrent configures publish in a defined order; failures leave the previous usable snapshot intact.
- Full/workspace/kind-filtered refresh sync, stale notification suppression, joined refresh replies, and manager fidelity retain existing behavior.
- In-flight cache invalidation/clear and configuration changes have explicit tested semantics.
- No regression in client-observed latency or long-lived cache behavior, and locator-state documentation includes the actual lifetime of every locator's mutable state.
Dependencies and prior work
Use #531 metrics and the #533 long-lived/concurrency workload before broad ownership changes. This establishes the ownership foundation for #539 and #540; the complete order is in #528. #385 fixed configure versus refresh isolation; #461 removed locator I/O from the configuration write lock. This issue extends consistency to find/resolve and must not regress either fix.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Rust
- Estrellas
- 207
- Forks
- 45
- Merge medio
- 3 d 6 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 12
Guía de contribución
No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de microsoft/python-environment-tools
-
enhancement
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
-
debt
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 25/100
microsoft/python-environment-tools#538 · 1 comentario ·
-
enhancement
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
-
debt
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
-
enhancement
Dificultad 5/5 Más de una semana Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
microsoft/python-environment-tools#533 · 2 comentarios ·
Todos los issues de microsoft/python-environment-tools
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
TheLarkInn/aipm#2413 ·
-
documentation
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 90/100
alexgorbatchev/simple-ptt#15 ·
-
tooling
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
-
todo:ticket
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 75/100
taikoxyz/taiko-mono#22168 · 1 comentario ·