Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

Give find and resolve coherent configuration snapshots without lock-held discovery

Abierto
#536 1 comentario 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
5/5
Tiempo estimado
Más de una semana
Aptitud para principiantes
25/100
Tipo de issue
Refactorización
Claridad
Bastante claro
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
rust

Línea de trabajo

Start with the configure, resolve, and find sections in crates/pet/src/jsonrpc.rs and the refresh-state contract in docs/LOCATOR_STATE.md; review #531 metrics and the #533 concurrency workload first. Define and test coherent old-or-new snapshots without holding configuration locks during filesystem or subprocess I/O. Done means the listed barrier, ordering, failure, refresh, cache, latency, and documentation criteria pass without regressing #385 or #461.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

debt

Tracking plan: #528
Priority: P2. Evidence: source-confirmed ownership inconsistency; add deterministic race tests before claiming a reproduced user failure.

Problem

Refresh uses a transient locator graph and a configuration-generation snapshot. Find/resolve still use the long-lived shared graph while configure mutates its locators one by one before publishing the new generation. Those operations can therefore observe partially applied configuration even though refresh has a coherent boundary.

Additionally, find passes a chained configuration read/clone expression directly into discovery; the temporary read guard can live through that call, retaining the configuration lock during filesystem work.

Sources: configure prepare/mutate/publish, resolve, find, refresh-state contract.

Scope

  • First make find's configuration snapshot an explicit local value and release its guard before discovery.
  • Define one coherent request-snapshot boundary for configure/refresh/find/resolve. Prefer constructing the replacement configuration/locator graph off-lock and atomically publishing it, rather than extending broad locks across I/O.
  • Separate deliberately shared performance caches from configured input and correctness-critical discovery state. Preserve current generation-gated notifications, locator ordering, scoped refresh-state sync, and coalescing semantics.
  • Replace unnecessary mutable-graph rollback complexity only where the new ownership model demonstrably removes the failure mode; do not bundle unrelated rewrites.

Acceptance criteria

  • Barrier/channel-driven tests prove find and resolve see either the old or new configuration, never a mix across locators.
  • Slow discovery/configuration fixtures do not hold a global configuration lock over filesystem or subprocess I/O.
  • Concurrent configures publish in a defined order; failures leave the previous usable snapshot intact.
  • Full/workspace/kind-filtered refresh sync, stale notification suppression, joined refresh replies, and manager fidelity retain existing behavior.
  • In-flight cache invalidation/clear and configuration changes have explicit tested semantics.
  • No regression in client-observed latency or long-lived cache behavior, and locator-state documentation includes the actual lifetime of every locator's mutable state.

Dependencies and prior work

Use #531 metrics and the #533 long-lived/concurrency workload before broad ownership changes. This establishes the ownership foundation for #539 and #540; the complete order is in #528. #385 fixed configure versus refresh isolation; #461 removed locator I/O from the configuration write lock. This issue extends consistency to find/resolve and must not regress either fix.

Lenguaje dominante
Rust
Estrellas
207
Forks
45
Merge medio
3 d 6 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
12

Guía de contribución

No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de microsoft/python-environment-tools

Todos los issues de microsoft/python-environment-tools

Issues similares

Más issues de Rust

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.