Hacktoberfest 2026: die Issues, die Maintainer für den Oktober markiert haben – offen und einsteigerfreundlich. Hacktoberfest-Issues durchsuchen

Give find and resolve coherent configuration snapshots without lock-held discovery

Offen
#536 1 Kommentar 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

Bewertung

Schwierigkeit
5/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
Über eine Woche
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
25/100
Issue-Typ
Refactoring
Klarheit
Größtenteils klar
Aktivitätsstatus
Aktiv
Tech-Stack
rust

Rechercherichtung

Start with the configure, resolve, and find sections in crates/pet/src/jsonrpc.rs and the refresh-state contract in docs/LOCATOR_STATE.md; review #531 metrics and the #533 concurrency workload first. Define and test coherent old-or-new snapshots without holding configuration locks during filesystem or subprocess I/O. Done means the listed barrier, ordering, failure, refresh, cache, latency, and documentation criteria pass without regressing #385 or #461.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Beschreibung

debt

Tracking plan: #528
Priority: P2. Evidence: source-confirmed ownership inconsistency; add deterministic race tests before claiming a reproduced user failure.

Problem

Refresh uses a transient locator graph and a configuration-generation snapshot. Find/resolve still use the long-lived shared graph while configure mutates its locators one by one before publishing the new generation. Those operations can therefore observe partially applied configuration even though refresh has a coherent boundary.

Additionally, find passes a chained configuration read/clone expression directly into discovery; the temporary read guard can live through that call, retaining the configuration lock during filesystem work.

Sources: configure prepare/mutate/publish, resolve, find, refresh-state contract.

Scope

  • First make find's configuration snapshot an explicit local value and release its guard before discovery.
  • Define one coherent request-snapshot boundary for configure/refresh/find/resolve. Prefer constructing the replacement configuration/locator graph off-lock and atomically publishing it, rather than extending broad locks across I/O.
  • Separate deliberately shared performance caches from configured input and correctness-critical discovery state. Preserve current generation-gated notifications, locator ordering, scoped refresh-state sync, and coalescing semantics.
  • Replace unnecessary mutable-graph rollback complexity only where the new ownership model demonstrably removes the failure mode; do not bundle unrelated rewrites.

Acceptance criteria

  • Barrier/channel-driven tests prove find and resolve see either the old or new configuration, never a mix across locators.
  • Slow discovery/configuration fixtures do not hold a global configuration lock over filesystem or subprocess I/O.
  • Concurrent configures publish in a defined order; failures leave the previous usable snapshot intact.
  • Full/workspace/kind-filtered refresh sync, stale notification suppression, joined refresh replies, and manager fidelity retain existing behavior.
  • In-flight cache invalidation/clear and configuration changes have explicit tested semantics.
  • No regression in client-observed latency or long-lived cache behavior, and locator-state documentation includes the actual lifetime of every locator's mutable state.

Dependencies and prior work

Use #531 metrics and the #533 long-lived/concurrency workload before broad ownership changes. This establishes the ownership foundation for #539 and #540; the complete order is in #528. #385 fixed configure versus refresh isolation; #461 removed locator I/O from the configuration write lock. This issue extends consistency to find/resolve and must not regress either fix.

Vorherrschende Sprache
Rust
Sterne
207
Forks
45
Ø Merge
3 T. 6 Std.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
12

Beitragsleitfaden

Für dieses Repository ist kein Beitragsleitfaden indexiert

Erste Schritte

  1. Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
  4. Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Mehr aus microsoft/python-environment-tools

Alle Issues in microsoft/python-environment-tools

Ähnliche Issues

Weitere Issues zu Rust

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.