Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Give find and resolve coherent configuration snapshots without lock-held discovery

未关闭
#536 1 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
25/100
Issue 类型
重构
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
rust

调研方向

Start with the configure, resolve, and find sections in crates/pet/src/jsonrpc.rs and the refresh-state contract in docs/LOCATOR_STATE.md; review #531 metrics and the #533 concurrency workload first. Define and test coherent old-or-new snapshots without holding configuration locks during filesystem or subprocess I/O. Done means the listed barrier, ordering, failure, refresh, cache, latency, and documentation criteria pass without regressing #385 or #461.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

debt

Tracking plan: #528
Priority: P2. Evidence: source-confirmed ownership inconsistency; add deterministic race tests before claiming a reproduced user failure.

Problem

Refresh uses a transient locator graph and a configuration-generation snapshot. Find/resolve still use the long-lived shared graph while configure mutates its locators one by one before publishing the new generation. Those operations can therefore observe partially applied configuration even though refresh has a coherent boundary.

Additionally, find passes a chained configuration read/clone expression directly into discovery; the temporary read guard can live through that call, retaining the configuration lock during filesystem work.

Sources: configure prepare/mutate/publish, resolve, find, refresh-state contract.

Scope

  • First make find's configuration snapshot an explicit local value and release its guard before discovery.
  • Define one coherent request-snapshot boundary for configure/refresh/find/resolve. Prefer constructing the replacement configuration/locator graph off-lock and atomically publishing it, rather than extending broad locks across I/O.
  • Separate deliberately shared performance caches from configured input and correctness-critical discovery state. Preserve current generation-gated notifications, locator ordering, scoped refresh-state sync, and coalescing semantics.
  • Replace unnecessary mutable-graph rollback complexity only where the new ownership model demonstrably removes the failure mode; do not bundle unrelated rewrites.

Acceptance criteria

  • Barrier/channel-driven tests prove find and resolve see either the old or new configuration, never a mix across locators.
  • Slow discovery/configuration fixtures do not hold a global configuration lock over filesystem or subprocess I/O.
  • Concurrent configures publish in a defined order; failures leave the previous usable snapshot intact.
  • Full/workspace/kind-filtered refresh sync, stale notification suppression, joined refresh replies, and manager fidelity retain existing behavior.
  • In-flight cache invalidation/clear and configuration changes have explicit tested semantics.
  • No regression in client-observed latency or long-lived cache behavior, and locator-state documentation includes the actual lifetime of every locator's mutable state.

Dependencies and prior work

Use #531 metrics and the #533 long-lived/concurrency workload before broad ownership changes. This establishes the ownership foundation for #539 and #540; the complete order is in #528. #385 fixed configure versus refresh isolation; #461 removed locator I/O from the configuration write lock. This issue extends consistency to find/resolve and must not regress either fix.

主要语言
Rust
星标
207
派生
45
平均合并
3 天 6 小时
30 天内合并 PR
12

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

microsoft/python-environment-tools 的其他 Issue

查看 microsoft/python-environment-tools 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Rust Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。