Give find and resolve coherent configuration snapshots without lock-held discovery
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 5/5
- 预计耗时
- 一周以上
- 新手友好度
- 25/100
- Issue 类型
- 重构
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- rust
- 领域
- api, backend, documentation, performance, testing-qa
调研方向
Start with the configure, resolve, and find sections in crates/pet/src/jsonrpc.rs and the refresh-state contract in docs/LOCATOR_STATE.md; review #531 metrics and the #533 concurrency workload first. Define and test coherent old-or-new snapshots without holding configuration locks during filesystem or subprocess I/O. Done means the listed barrier, ordering, failure, refresh, cache, latency, and documentation criteria pass without regressing #385 or #461.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Tracking plan: #528
Priority: P2. Evidence: source-confirmed ownership inconsistency; add deterministic race tests before claiming a reproduced user failure.
Problem
Refresh uses a transient locator graph and a configuration-generation snapshot. Find/resolve still use the long-lived shared graph while configure mutates its locators one by one before publishing the new generation. Those operations can therefore observe partially applied configuration even though refresh has a coherent boundary.
Additionally, find passes a chained configuration read/clone expression directly into discovery; the temporary read guard can live through that call, retaining the configuration lock during filesystem work.
Sources: configure prepare/mutate/publish, resolve, find, refresh-state contract.
Scope
- First make find's configuration snapshot an explicit local value and release its guard before discovery.
- Define one coherent request-snapshot boundary for configure/refresh/find/resolve. Prefer constructing the replacement configuration/locator graph off-lock and atomically publishing it, rather than extending broad locks across I/O.
- Separate deliberately shared performance caches from configured input and correctness-critical discovery state. Preserve current generation-gated notifications, locator ordering, scoped refresh-state sync, and coalescing semantics.
- Replace unnecessary mutable-graph rollback complexity only where the new ownership model demonstrably removes the failure mode; do not bundle unrelated rewrites.
Acceptance criteria
- Barrier/channel-driven tests prove find and resolve see either the old or new configuration, never a mix across locators.
- Slow discovery/configuration fixtures do not hold a global configuration lock over filesystem or subprocess I/O.
- Concurrent configures publish in a defined order; failures leave the previous usable snapshot intact.
- Full/workspace/kind-filtered refresh sync, stale notification suppression, joined refresh replies, and manager fidelity retain existing behavior.
- In-flight cache invalidation/clear and configuration changes have explicit tested semantics.
- No regression in client-observed latency or long-lived cache behavior, and locator-state documentation includes the actual lifetime of every locator's mutable state.
Dependencies and prior work
Use #531 metrics and the #533 long-lived/concurrency workload before broad ownership changes. This establishes the ownership foundation for #539 and #540; the complete order is in #528. #385 fixed configure versus refresh isolation; #461 removed locator I/O from the configuration write lock. This issue extends consistency to find/resolve and must not regress either fix.
- 主要语言
- Rust
- 星标
- 207
- 派生
- 45
- 平均合并
- 3 天 6 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 12
贡献指南
这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
microsoft/python-environment-tools 的其他 Issue
-
enhancement
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 35/100
-
debt
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 25/100
microsoft/python-environment-tools#538 · 1 条评论 ·
-
enhancement
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 35/100
-
debt
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 35/100
-
enhancement
难度 5/5 一周以上 新手友好度 35/100
microsoft/python-environment-tools#533 · 2 条评论 ·
查看 microsoft/python-environment-tools 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
TheLarkInn/aipm#2413 ·
-
documentation
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 90/100
alexgorbatchev/simple-ptt#15 ·
-
tooling
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
-
todo:ticket
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
taikoxyz/taiko-mono#22168 · 1 条评论 ·