[Task][RFC]: Evaluate optional independent assessment under the RFC decision gates
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 39/100
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- python
- Área
- ai-infra-agents
Línea de trabajo
Read the canonical RFC and loopx/capabilities/progress_review/README.md first, then inspect packages/loopx-jev and loopx/capabilities/explore for the existing boundaries. This issue requests decision work, not implementation or an experiment, so begin with a source-grounded decision brief for one evidenced caller. Done means resolving Q1–Q4 with the rubric, comparator, budget and stop rules, while keeping defer or reject valid outcomes.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Outcome / 目标
评估可选独立判断，先完成研究决策。One task tracks this RFC's delivery; keep implementation PRs and milestone evidence here instead of creating a parallel task tree.
Canonical design: RFC. Roadmap: S11 · decision required, under #4574. Design acceptance is distinct from implementation, live qualification and promotion.
Current boundary
Source audit: main at ce3862e33 (2026-09-28). This is source/PR inspection, not a new test or live-qualification claim.
The RFC accepts discussion intake only. The optional progress-review sentinel and a separate shadow implementation proposal are not evidence that Jev is qualified or that product adoption is approved.
Work remaining
- Resolve Q1–Q4 for one evidenced caller: problem, finite question, checkpoint, data, existing-model comparator, rubric, budget and stop rules; retain defer/reject as valid outcomes.
- Only after that decision, perform the authorized comparison and use Q5–Q7 to decide a bounded pilot or no adoption.
Ownership and ongoing work
Reuse #4391 and existing progress-review/Explore owners. Claimable work now is the decision brief and source-grounded analysis, not an unapproved experiment or mandatory Jev integration.
Contribution route: design/evaluation decision work is available; research execution and adoption retain the explicit RFC gates.
Acceptance
- Freeze the rubric and error costs before results; compare full-workflow utility, false positives/negatives, cost and latency with fair inputs.
- D7 ranking cannot escape the legal same-priority Todo cohort; D8 cannot override fixed research budgets or authority.
- Default-off behavior, replay and removal remain intact; advice never grants execution/settlement authority.
- Reconcile the RFC's current delivery checkpoint and this issue with the integrated revision, commands, passed/failed/untested evidence and remaining gates. Close the accepted scope only; no claim that a merged PR alone completes the RFC.
Starting points and delivery boundary
Base: latest main. Reuse the existing typed owner and provider boundaries. Include affected CLI/frontend/Lark companions; verify real entrypoints and backend where changed. Preserve existing first-screen review and maintainer merge gates. Public artifacts contain only synthetic/public-safe evidence, no private operational state. This task does not authorize provider promotion, benchmark launches, release/deployment or unrelated protected effects.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Python
- Estrellas
- 6.2k
- Forks
- 596
- Merge medio
- 7 h 47 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 904
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de loopx-project/loopx
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 84/100
loopx-project/loopx#6842 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
loopx-project/loopx#6108 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
loopx-project/loopx#5688 · 2 comentarios ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 60/100
loopx-project/loopx#5632 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
loopx-project/loopx#5443 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de loopx-project/loopx
Issues similares
-
infrastructure
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
khuisman/mcp-gee-sweet#1152 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
-
backroom bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
ditto-assistant/ditto-subnet#3069 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 67/100
open-webui/open-webui#32901 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
0.3.3 bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día