Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

[Task][RFC]: Evaluate optional independent assessment under the RFC decision gates

Aperta
  • Qualcosa non va?
#5,213 1 commento 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
5/5
Tempo stimato
Più di una settimana
Idoneità per principianti
39/100
Tipo di issue
Funzionalità
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Stato di attività
Attiva
Stack tecnologico
python
Ambito
ai-infra-agents

Direzione di ricerca

Read the canonical RFC and loopx/capabilities/progress_review/README.md first, then inspect packages/loopx-jev and loopx/capabilities/explore for the existing boundaries. This issue requests decision work, not implementation or an experiment, so begin with a source-grounded decision brief for one evidenced caller. Done means resolving Q1–Q4 with the rubric, comparator, budget and stop rules, while keeping defer or reject valid outcomes.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

direction/architecture-evolution question

Outcome / 目标

评估可选独立判断，先完成研究决策。One task tracks this RFC's delivery; keep implementation PRs and milestone evidence here instead of creating a parallel task tree.

Canonical design: RFC. Roadmap: S11 · decision required, under #4574. Design acceptance is distinct from implementation, live qualification and promotion.

Current boundary

Source audit: main at ce3862e33 (2026-09-28). This is source/PR inspection, not a new test or live-qualification claim.

The RFC accepts discussion intake only. The optional progress-review sentinel and a separate shadow implementation proposal are not evidence that Jev is qualified or that product adoption is approved.

Work remaining

  • Resolve Q1–Q4 for one evidenced caller: problem, finite question, checkpoint, data, existing-model comparator, rubric, budget and stop rules; retain defer/reject as valid outcomes.
  • Only after that decision, perform the authorized comparison and use Q5–Q7 to decide a bounded pilot or no adoption.

Ownership and ongoing work

Reuse #4391 and existing progress-review/Explore owners. Claimable work now is the decision brief and source-grounded analysis, not an unapproved experiment or mandatory Jev integration.

Contribution route: design/evaluation decision work is available; research execution and adoption retain the explicit RFC gates.

Acceptance

  • Freeze the rubric and error costs before results; compare full-workflow utility, false positives/negatives, cost and latency with fair inputs.
  • D7 ranking cannot escape the legal same-priority Todo cohort; D8 cannot override fixed research budgets or authority.
  • Default-off behavior, replay and removal remain intact; advice never grants execution/settlement authority.
  • Reconcile the RFC's current delivery checkpoint and this issue with the integrated revision, commands, passed/failed/untested evidence and remaining gates. Close the accepted scope only; no claim that a merged PR alone completes the RFC.

Starting points and delivery boundary

Base: latest main. Reuse the existing typed owner and provider boundaries. Include affected CLI/frontend/Lark companions; verify real entrypoints and backend where changed. Preserve existing first-screen review and maintainer merge gates. Public artifacts contain only synthetic/public-safe evidence, no private operational state. This task does not authorize provider promotion, benchmark launches, release/deployment or unrelated protected effects.

Lingua principale
Python
Stelle
6.2k
Fork
596
Merge medio
7h 35m
PR unite (30g)
928

Preparare l'ambiente

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di loopx-project/loopx

Tutte le issue di loopx-project/loopx

Issue simili

Altre issue su Python

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.