Hacktoberfest 2026 : les issues que les mainteneurs ont marquées pour octobre, ouvertes et accessibles aux débutants. Parcourir les issues Hacktoberfest

[Task][RFC]: Evaluate optional independent assessment under the RFC decision gates

Ouverte
  • Quelque chose ne va pas ?
#5,213 1 commentaire 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub

Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour

Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.

Évaluation

Difficulté
5/5
Temps estimé
Plus d'une semaine
Accessibilité débutants
39/100
Type d'issue
Fonctionnalité
Clarté
Plutôt claire
Activité
Active
Stack technique
python
Domaine
ai-infra-agents

Piste de recherche

Read the canonical RFC and loopx/capabilities/progress_review/README.md first, then inspect packages/loopx-jev and loopx/capabilities/explore for the existing boundaries. This issue requests decision work, not implementation or an experiment, so begin with a source-grounded decision brief for one evidenced caller. Done means resolving Q1–Q4 with the rubric, comparator, budget and stop rules, while keeping defer or reject valid outcomes.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.

Description

direction/architecture-evolution question

Outcome / 目标

评估可选独立判断，先完成研究决策。One task tracks this RFC's delivery; keep implementation PRs and milestone evidence here instead of creating a parallel task tree.

Canonical design: RFC. Roadmap: S11 · decision required, under #4574. Design acceptance is distinct from implementation, live qualification and promotion.

Current boundary

Source audit: main at ce3862e33 (2026-09-28). This is source/PR inspection, not a new test or live-qualification claim.

The RFC accepts discussion intake only. The optional progress-review sentinel and a separate shadow implementation proposal are not evidence that Jev is qualified or that product adoption is approved.

Work remaining

  • Resolve Q1–Q4 for one evidenced caller: problem, finite question, checkpoint, data, existing-model comparator, rubric, budget and stop rules; retain defer/reject as valid outcomes.
  • Only after that decision, perform the authorized comparison and use Q5–Q7 to decide a bounded pilot or no adoption.

Ownership and ongoing work

Reuse #4391 and existing progress-review/Explore owners. Claimable work now is the decision brief and source-grounded analysis, not an unapproved experiment or mandatory Jev integration.

Contribution route: design/evaluation decision work is available; research execution and adoption retain the explicit RFC gates.

Acceptance

  • Freeze the rubric and error costs before results; compare full-workflow utility, false positives/negatives, cost and latency with fair inputs.
  • D7 ranking cannot escape the legal same-priority Todo cohort; D8 cannot override fixed research budgets or authority.
  • Default-off behavior, replay and removal remain intact; advice never grants execution/settlement authority.
  • Reconcile the RFC's current delivery checkpoint and this issue with the integrated revision, commands, passed/failed/untested evidence and remaining gates. Close the accepted scope only; no claim that a merged PR alone completes the RFC.

Starting points and delivery boundary

Base: latest main. Reuse the existing typed owner and provider boundaries. Include affected CLI/frontend/Lark companions; verify real entrypoints and backend where changed. Preserve existing first-screen review and maintainer merge gates. Public artifacts contain only synthetic/public-safe evidence, no private operational state. This task does not authorize provider promotion, benchmark launches, release/deployment or unrelated protected effects.

Langage dominant
Python
Étoiles
6.2k
Forks
596
Merge moyen
7 h 47 min
PR mergées (30 j)
904

Préparer son environnement

Par où commencer

  1. Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
  2. Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
  3. Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
  4. Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.

Autres issues de loopx-project/loopx

Toutes les issues de loopx-project/loopx

Issues similaires

Plus d'issues Python

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.