Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

[Task][RFC]: Evaluate optional independent assessment under the RFC decision gates

未关闭
#5,213 1 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
39/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
python

调研方向

Read the canonical RFC and loopx/capabilities/progress_review/README.md first, then inspect packages/loopx-jev and loopx/capabilities/explore for the existing boundaries. This issue requests decision work, not implementation or an experiment, so begin with a source-grounded decision brief for one evidenced caller. Done means resolving Q1–Q4 with the rubric, comparator, budget and stop rules, while keeping defer or reject valid outcomes.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

direction/architecture-evolution question

Outcome / 目标

评估可选独立判断,先完成研究决策。One task tracks this RFC's delivery; keep implementation PRs and milestone evidence here instead of creating a parallel task tree.

Canonical design: RFC. Roadmap: S11 · decision required, under #4574. Design acceptance is distinct from implementation, live qualification and promotion.

Current boundary

Source audit: main at ce3862e33 (2026-09-28). This is source/PR inspection, not a new test or live-qualification claim.

The RFC accepts discussion intake only. The optional progress-review sentinel and a separate shadow implementation proposal are not evidence that Jev is qualified or that product adoption is approved.

Work remaining

  • Resolve Q1–Q4 for one evidenced caller: problem, finite question, checkpoint, data, existing-model comparator, rubric, budget and stop rules; retain defer/reject as valid outcomes.
  • Only after that decision, perform the authorized comparison and use Q5–Q7 to decide a bounded pilot or no adoption.

Ownership and ongoing work

Reuse #4391 and existing progress-review/Explore owners. Claimable work now is the decision brief and source-grounded analysis, not an unapproved experiment or mandatory Jev integration.

Contribution route: design/evaluation decision work is available; research execution and adoption retain the explicit RFC gates.

Acceptance

  • Freeze the rubric and error costs before results; compare full-workflow utility, false positives/negatives, cost and latency with fair inputs.
  • D7 ranking cannot escape the legal same-priority Todo cohort; D8 cannot override fixed research budgets or authority.
  • Default-off behavior, replay and removal remain intact; advice never grants execution/settlement authority.
  • Reconcile the RFC's current delivery checkpoint and this issue with the integrated revision, commands, passed/failed/untested evidence and remaining gates. Close the accepted scope only; no claim that a merged PR alone completes the RFC.

Starting points and delivery boundary

Base: latest main. Reuse the existing typed owner and provider boundaries. Include affected CLI/frontend/Lark companions; verify real entrypoints and backend where changed. Preserve existing first-screen review and maintainer merge gates. Public artifacts contain only synthetic/public-safe evidence, no private operational state. This task does not authorize provider promotion, benchmark launches, release/deployment or unrelated protected effects.

主要语言
Python
星标
6.2k
派生
596
平均合并
6 小时 44 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
915

环境准备

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

loopx-project/loopx 的其他 Issue

查看 loopx-project/loopx 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。