Ordered loader retains earlier requests after a newer authoritative read succeeds
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 35/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- typescript
Línea de trabajo
Start with packages/db/tests/query/ordered-source-loader-state-oracle.test.ts, especially checkAuthorityCase near line 1632, and replay the recorded seed and path on the specified commit. Compare production request retirement with the oracle’s model and observation checkpoint, then exercise the nearby synchronous repair, release-triggered truncate, and joined-work histories. Done means the original failure is reproduced, a repair passes the shared comparisons, a hostile mutant fails, and a real Collection or provider witness supports any public resource claim.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
The Release workflow for the first RC failed the ordered-loader request-authority oracle on merged release commit 71bf598a3d13d37db28ac112431fd8be790957fe (#2217).
Executed CI evidence
- Failed Test (db-2) job
- Owner:
packages/db/tests/query/ordered-source-loader-state-oracle.test.ts - Test:
holds, retires, and recovers requests under generated settlement orders (random campaign) - Property:
ordered-loader.request-authority - Seed:
-845274422 - Path:
2109:1:3:6:4:8:10:13:15 - Failed after 2,110 generated tests, shrunk eight times.
- Assertion checkpoint:
checkAuthorityCase, line 1632, after the history drain and any explicit retry.
no leak: requests [3,4] are still held after authoritative request 5 succeeded
{"indexed":false,"limit":1,"settledFirst":true,"releaseFault":false,"syncRepair":true,"requiresFullSource":false,"joined":true,"snapshotRows":1,"needsMore":true,"retryTimer":false,"releaseTruncates":true,"offset":0,"releaseReenters":false,"releaseDisposes":false,"history":[{"type":"settle","pick":0,"ok":true},{"type":"settle","pick":0,"ok":true},{"type":"report","react":false},{"type":"move","delta":-1},{"type":"joinedBusy"},{"type":"settleNewest"}]}
Accepted law and limits of this report
The owner's “No leak” law states that once loading is quiet and no failure blocks it, the loader holds nothing issued before its last successful authoritative read. Retained demands can be read again on later refetches. The oracle uses the real loader with a controlled subscription; this mismatch establishes a failing request-ledger comparison, not incorrect public query rows or a measured production resource leak. Diagnose production retirement versus the oracle's model, replay ownership and observation checkpoint before changing either one.
This exact trace has not yet been replayed independently. The observed assertion is from the executed CI run; it is not a timeout or a reach failure.
Replay
Run from packages/db on the recorded commit:
TANSTACK_DB_ORACLE_PROPERTY=ordered-loader.request-authority \
TANSTACK_DB_ORACLE_SEED=-845274422 \
TANSTACK_DB_ORACLE_PATH=2109:1:3:6:4:8:10:13:15 \
pnpm exec vitest run --coverage.enabled=false --typecheck.enabled=false \
tests/query/ordered-source-loader-state-oracle.test.ts -t 'random campaign'
Keep this history in the shared comparison and exercise nearby synchronous repair, release-triggered truncate and joined-work histories before a production repair. Show RED on the original code, GREEN after repair and a hostile mutant that fails. A real Collection/provider receiving witness is needed before claiming the public resource consequence is closed.
Related loader retirement investigations: #2223 (failed request across cursor reset) and #2191 (request authority/retirement). This trace has only successful explicit settlements; identity with either earlier report is not established. It is separate from the publication-retention report #2294 and multi-tab Electric report #2281.
The maintainer explicitly approved recording this counterexample as a follow-up and retrying the first RC release while leaving the defect open. No test, comparison or run budget has been weakened. A passing retry does not close this issue.
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 4k
- Forks
- 277
- Merge medio
- 1 d 6 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 199
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de TanStack/db
-
`Collection.currentStateAsChanges` JSDoc examples don’t match `CurrentStateAsChangesOptions`Abierto
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
OfflineExecutor.dispose() never settles pendingTransactionPromisesPosiblemente ocupada @Claire-ovo la tomó hace 5 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
TanStack/db#2254 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Two @tanstack/db tests time out under CPU load because a cold module import counts against the 5 s default timeoutPosiblemente ocupada @jp-knj la tomó hace 3 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de TanStack/db
Issues similares
-
area:cli bug P4
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug from-studio
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
esengine/DeepSeek-Reasonix#14868 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
loopbackio/loopback-next#11878 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días
-
bug 🐛
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
comunica/comunica#1925 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día