OfflineExecutor.dispose() never settles pendingTransactionPromises
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 2/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-3 horas
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 78/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- node.js, typescript
Línea de trabajo
Empieza por packages/offline-transactions/src/OfflineExecutor.ts, especialmente por waitForTransactionCompletion, resolveTransaction/rejectTransaction y dispose(), tal como se enlazan en el issue. Sigue cómo se corresponden los deferreds pendientes con las transacciones y revisa las pruebas de disposal y de transacciones del paquete. Reproduce la secuencia de commit offline, disposal y replay del issue; se considera terminado cuando la transacción original alcanza un estado resuelto y su isPersisted.promise deja de quedar bloqueada.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
- I've validated the bug against the latest version of DB packages
Describe the bug
OfflineExecutor keeps a pendingTransactionPromises map of deferreds, created by waitForTransactionCompletion and settled by resolveTransaction / rejectTransaction. dispose() pauses the executor and tears down the collection refresh hooks, the online listener, leadership, and the online detector, but it never touches the map. Every deferred in it is abandoned, so a transaction committed on a disposed executor never leaves persisting, and its isPersisted.promise never settles.
To Reproduce
npm i @tanstack/[email protected] @tanstack/dband save the script below asrepro.mjs. It runs in plain Node: in-memory storage stands in for IndexedDB and is shared by both executors, and connectivity and leader election are stubbed.- Start an executor offline and commit a transaction. It persists to the outbox, and the mutation fn does not run.
- Call
dispose()on that executor and start a successor on the same storage, online. - The successor replays the row, runs the mutation fn once, and empties the outbox.
- See that the original transaction still reads
persistingand itsisPersisted.promiseis unsettled (node repro.mjs --dispose). The control run without the dispose resolves (node repro.mjs).
repro.mjs
import { createCollection, localOnlyCollectionOptions } from "@tanstack/db";
import { startOfflineExecutor } from "@tanstack/offline-transactions";
const withDispose = process.argv.includes("--dispose");
// Shared in-memory storage, standing in for IndexedDB across both executors.
const store = new Map();
const storage = {
get: async (k) => store.get(k) ?? null,
set: async (k, v) => void store.set(k, v),
delete: async (k) => void store.delete(k),
keys: async () => [...store.keys()],
clear: async () => void store.clear(),
};
// Always-leader election: no Web Locks in Node.
const leaderElection = {
requestLeadership: async () => true,
releaseLeadership: () => {},
isLeader: () => true,
onLeadershipChange: () => () => {},
};
// Manually toggled connectivity.
function makeDetector(initiallyOnline) {
let online = initiallyOnline;
const listeners = new Set();
return {
subscribe: (cb) => (listeners.add(cb), () => listeners.delete(cb)),
notifyOnline: () => listeners.forEach((cb) => cb()),
isOnline: () => online,
dispose: () => listeners.clear(),
goOnline() {
online = true;
listeners.forEach((cb) => cb());
},
};
}
const todos = createCollection(
localOnlyCollectionOptions({ id: "todos", getKey: (t) => t.id }),
);
const calls = [];
const mutationFns = {
syncTodos: async ({ transaction }) => {
calls.push(transaction.id);
},
};
const sleep = (ms) => new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, ms));
const settledWithin = (promise, ms) =>
Promise.race([
promise.then(
() => "resolved",
(e) => `rejected: ${e?.message}`,
),
sleep(ms).then(() => "STILL PENDING"),
]);
// 1. Start offline and commit a transaction; it persists to the outbox.
const detector1 = makeDetector(false);
const executor1 = startOfflineExecutor({
collections: { todos },
mutationFns,
storage,
leaderElection,
onlineDetector: detector1,
});
await executor1.waitForInit();
const tx = executor1.createOfflineTransaction({ mutationFnName: "syncTodos" });
// autoCommit defaults to true, so mutate() commits.
const transaction = tx.mutate(() => todos.insert({ id: "1", text: "hello" }));
const isPersisted = transaction.isPersisted.promise;
await sleep(100);
console.log("outbox rows after offline commit:", store.size);
console.log("mutationFn calls while offline:", calls.length);
let completer;
if (withDispose) {
// 2. Dispose (the recreate pattern) and start a successor on the same storage.
executor1.dispose();
const detector2 = makeDetector(true);
completer = startOfflineExecutor({
collections: { todos },
mutationFns,
storage,
leaderElection,
onlineDetector: detector2,
});
await completer.waitForInit();
} else {
// Control: no dispose, just come back online on the same executor.
detector1.goOnline();
completer = executor1;
}
// 3. Let the outbox drain.
await sleep(500);
console.log("mutationFn calls after replay:", calls.length);
console.log("outbox rows after replay:", store.size);
console.log("pending count on completing executor:", completer.getPendingCount());
// 4. The promises the first executor handed out.
console.log("transaction.state:", transaction.state);
console.log("isPersisted.promise:", await settledWithin(isPersisted, 2000));
process.exit(0);
Output:
== node repro.mjs (control: no dispose)
outbox rows after offline commit: 1
mutationFn calls while offline: 0
mutationFn calls after replay: 1
outbox rows after replay: 0
pending count on completing executor: 0
transaction.state: completed
isPersisted.promise: resolved
== node repro.mjs --dispose
outbox rows after offline commit: 1
mutationFn calls while offline: 0
mutationFn calls after replay: 1
outbox rows after replay: 0
pending count on completing executor: 0
transaction.state: persisting
isPersisted.promise: STILL PENDING
Expected behavior
dispose() settles every deferred in pendingTransactionPromises, so no caller is left awaiting a transaction from a disposed executor. Either of these would work:
- Reject each deferred with a disposal error the caller can treat as retriable.
- Expose the pending ids so a successor executor can re-bridge them, and resolve them when it completes the replayed transaction.
Screenshots
N/A. The repro's console output is above.
Desktop (please complete the following information):
- OS: Linux (kernel 6.18)
- Browser: N/A. Reproduced in Node v24.22.1. The executor code path is environment-independent.
- Version:
@tanstack/offline-transactions1.1.4,@tanstack/db0.15.2.dispose()is unchanged onmainat d2935d0.
Smartphone (please complete the following information):
- N/A
Additional context
I first hit this on 1.0.42 in an app whose outbox recreates its executor whenever a new collection registers. I work around it with a completion ledger that carries isPersisted settlement across the recreate, but an upstream fix would let me delete this workaround.
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 4k
- Forks
- 277
- Merge medio
- 17 h 40 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 223
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de TanStack/db
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Garbage collection cleans up a collection while one of its transactions is still persistingPosiblemente ocupada @Nabil372 la tomó hace 1 día. Abierto
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
persistedCollectionOptions without a schema can't be passed to createCollection (follow-up to #1452)Abierto
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Electric: scoped move-in snapshots can prematurely resolve awaitTxId and remove optimistic rowsAbierto
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 38/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de TanStack/db
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 72/100
grafana/profiles-drilldown#1212 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
grafana/traces-drilldown#980 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Manager flashes an empty "errorOccurred" dialog while redirecting a logged-out user to loginAbierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
openremote/openremote#3487 · 1 comentario ·
-
triage:needs-human
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 67/100
garrytan/gbrain#7635 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
coollabsio/jean#867 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día