setWindow publishes the new page before its include demand settles (on-demand materialize / toArray)
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 30/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- typescript
- Área
- databases
Línea de trabajo
Start by running the repro script from the issue (bun repro.ts) to confirm the early publish, then read the Atomic window publication and Pending demand sections of packages/db/src/query/live/ARCHITECTURE.md together with the decision in #2131. The question to settle is whether include demand created by a window move should hold publication, which needs a maintainer ruling first. Done means either a fix where the window publishes once with its includes, or a documented and exposed pending-move state, with tests covering the setWindow path.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
- I've validated the bug against the latest version of DB packages (
@tanstack/[email protected];mainhas only a docs commit since)
Describe the bug
When a windowed live query has an include over an on-demand source, setWindow() publishes the new page before its include demand settles. The new parent rows appear with empty includes (undefined for materialize(findOne()), [] for toArray()), and the children fill in on a later publication.
The initial load does not do this. preload() waits for the include demand, and the first publication already has every child. The setWindow() promise also waits correctly: it settles only after the children load. Only the publication during the move is early.
This seems to go against Atomic window publication ("the public Collection publishes the completed window once") and the decision in #2131 that an on-demand window "keeps publishing its last complete snapshot" while a window move is in flight. It may instead be intended under Pending demand does not hide the parent row. I couldn't find a rule for which of these applies to include demand that a window move creates.
To Reproduce
Standalone script, no framework: eager parents, so the window move needs no async load, and on-demand children whose loadSubset answers after 200 ms. Run with bun repro.ts.
repro.ts
// bun repro.ts
import {
BasicIndex,
createCollection,
createLiveQueryCollection,
eq,
extractSimpleComparisons,
localOnlyCollectionOptions,
materialize,
} from '@tanstack/db'
type Parent = { id: number }
type Child = { id: number; parentId: number; name: string }
const CHILD_LOAD_MS = 200
const indexed = { autoIndex: 'eager', defaultIndexType: BasicIndex } as const
const start = performance.now()
const log = (message: string) => console.log(`${(performance.now() - start).toFixed(0).padStart(4)} ms ${message}`)
// Eager parents, so the window move itself needs no async load
const parents = createCollection(
localOnlyCollectionOptions({
...indexed,
getKey: (p: Parent) => p.id,
initialData: Array.from({ length: 9 }, (_, i) => ({ id: i + 1 })),
}),
)
// On-demand children, served by a backend that answers after CHILD_LOAD_MS
const backend: Array<Child> = Array.from({ length: 9 }, (_, i) => ({
id: 101 + i,
parentId: i + 1,
name: `child-of-${i + 1}`,
}))
const children = createCollection<Child, number>({
...indexed,
getKey: (c) => c.id,
syncMode: 'on-demand',
sync: {
sync: ({ begin, write, commit, markReady }) => {
markReady()
return {
loadSubset: async (options) => {
const parentIds = new Set<number>()
for (const f of extractSimpleComparisons(options.where)) {
if (f.field.join('.') !== 'parentId') continue
for (const v of f.operator === 'in' ? (f.value as Array<number>) : [f.value as number]) parentIds.add(v)
}
log(` children.loadSubset parentIds=[${[...parentIds]}]`)
await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, CHILD_LOAD_MS))
begin()
for (const c of backend.filter((c) => parentIds.has(c.parentId))) write({ type: 'insert', value: c })
commit()
log(' children.loadSubset resolved')
},
}
},
},
})
const page = createLiveQueryCollection({
query: (q) =>
q
.from({ p: parents })
.orderBy(({ p }) => p.id)
.limit(3)
.select(({ p }) => ({
id: p.id,
child: materialize(
q
.from({ c: children })
.where(({ c }) => eq(c.parentId, p.id))
.findOne(),
),
})),
})
const show = () => `[${page.toArray.map((r) => `${r.id}:${r.child?.name ?? 'MISSING'}`).join(', ')}]`
page.subscribeChanges(() => log(`publish ${show()} isLoadingSubset=${page.isLoadingSubset}`))
await page.preload()
log(`preload settled ${show()}`)
log('setWindow({ offset: 3, limit: 3 })')
const settlement = page.utils.setWindow({ offset: 3, limit: 3 })
if (settlement !== true) await settlement
log(`setWindow settled ${show()}`)
Output:
26 ms children.loadSubset parentIds=[1,2,3]
230 ms publish [1:child-of-1, 2:child-of-2, 3:child-of-3] isLoadingSubset=false
231 ms children.loadSubset resolved
231 ms publish [1:child-of-1, 2:child-of-2, 3:child-of-3] isLoadingSubset=false
231 ms preload settled [1:child-of-1, 2:child-of-2, 3:child-of-3]
231 ms setWindow({ offset: 3, limit: 3 })
234 ms children.loadSubset parentIds=[4,5,6]
235 ms publish [4:MISSING, 5:MISSING, 6:MISSING] isLoadingSubset=true <-- page published before its includes
436 ms publish [4:child-of-4, 5:child-of-5, 6:child-of-6] isLoadingSubset=false
436 ms children.loadSubset resolved
438 ms setWindow settled [4:child-of-4, 5:child-of-5, 6:child-of-6]
Replacing materialize(...findOne()) with toArray(...) gives the same sequence, with [] instead of undefined.
Expected behavior
The same as the initial load: while the move is pending, keep publishing the last complete window ([1, 2, 3] with their children). Then publish [4, 5, 6] once, with their children, when the setWindow() promise settles.
If publishing the parents early is intended, it would help to document that for window moves, and for the hooks to expose that a move is pending. Today useLiveQuery's isLoading / isReady only cover the initial load, and isLoadingSubset isn't returned. An app can only hide the partial page by awaiting the setWindow() promise itself.
Real-world impact
A paginated table with numbered pages, over Electric on-demand collections. The query has an orderBy and materialize includes for the related rows, and the page is moved with setWindow (the workaround described in #2291). On every page change, the cells built from includes (reference, client, delivery date, a status computed from a related row) show their empty fallback for about 900 ms. Then they switch to the real values. A status derived from the related row can briefly be wrong, not just empty.
Environment
@tanstack/[email protected]- Bun 1.4.0, Windows 11 (the app: Chrome,
@tanstack/[email protected],@tanstack/[email protected])
Additional context
- #2291 / #2316: page moves through
useLiveQuery. #2316 lists "new include-publication semantics" as out of scope, so this behavior would carry over to adapter-owned page windows. - #2131: the policy decision to hold the last complete snapshot while a window move is in flight.
- #2156: includes are routed only from the rows the window shows. That is why a move creates new child demand at all.
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 4k
- Forks
- 277
- Merge medio
- 1 d 7 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 172
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de TanStack/db
-
`Collection.currentStateAsChanges` JSDoc examples don’t match `CurrentStateAsChangesOptions`Abierto
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
OfflineExecutor.dispose() never settles pendingTransactionPromisesQuizá libre de nuevo @Claire-ovo la tomó hace 7 días y no hay ningún pull request abierto. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
TanStack/db#2254 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Two @tanstack/db tests time out under CPU load because a cold module import counts against the 5 s default timeoutPosiblemente ocupada @jp-knj la tomó hace 5 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Disabled useLiveQuery fails SSR hydration with error 253Posiblemente ocupada @Jaime02 la tomó hace 2 días. Abierto
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 42/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de TanStack/db
Issues similares
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
JuliusBrussee/caveman#1449 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
linagora/twake-calendar-frontend#1924 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Add: Class TV ModaAbiertocheck:passed streams:add
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 65/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 70/100
libnativeapi/nativeapi#21 ·
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
GiganticMinecraft/seichi-playguide#183 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día