Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Ordered loader retains earlier requests after a newer authoritative read succeeds

未关闭
#2,296 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

@KyleAMathews 已经在做这个了。

开始于 2026年10月29日。

  • #2302 来自 @KyleAMathews —— 未关闭

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
35/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
typescript
领域
backend, testing

调研方向

Start with packages/db/tests/query/ordered-source-loader-state-oracle.test.ts, especially checkAuthorityCase near line 1632, and replay the recorded seed and path on the specified commit. Compare production request retirement with the oracle’s model and observation checkpoint, then exercise the nearby synchronous repair, release-triggered truncate, and joined-work histories. Done means the original failure is reproduced, a repair passes the shared comparisons, a hostile mutant fails, and a real Collection or provider witness supports any public resource claim.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

The Release workflow for the first RC failed the ordered-loader request-authority oracle on merged release commit 71bf598a3d13d37db28ac112431fd8be790957fe (#2217).

Executed CI evidence

  • Failed Test (db-2) job
  • Owner: packages/db/tests/query/ordered-source-loader-state-oracle.test.ts
  • Test: holds, retires, and recovers requests under generated settlement orders (random campaign)
  • Property: ordered-loader.request-authority
  • Seed: -845274422
  • Path: 2109:1:3:6:4:8:10:13:15
  • Failed after 2,110 generated tests, shrunk eight times.
  • Assertion checkpoint: checkAuthorityCase, line 1632, after the history drain and any explicit retry.
no leak: requests [3,4] are still held after authoritative request 5 succeeded
{"indexed":false,"limit":1,"settledFirst":true,"releaseFault":false,"syncRepair":true,"requiresFullSource":false,"joined":true,"snapshotRows":1,"needsMore":true,"retryTimer":false,"releaseTruncates":true,"offset":0,"releaseReenters":false,"releaseDisposes":false,"history":[{"type":"settle","pick":0,"ok":true},{"type":"settle","pick":0,"ok":true},{"type":"report","react":false},{"type":"move","delta":-1},{"type":"joinedBusy"},{"type":"settleNewest"}]}

Accepted law and limits of this report

The owner's “No leak” law states that once loading is quiet and no failure blocks it, the loader holds nothing issued before its last successful authoritative read. Retained demands can be read again on later refetches. The oracle uses the real loader with a controlled subscription; this mismatch establishes a failing request-ledger comparison, not incorrect public query rows or a measured production resource leak. Diagnose production retirement versus the oracle's model, replay ownership and observation checkpoint before changing either one.

This exact trace has not yet been replayed independently. The observed assertion is from the executed CI run; it is not a timeout or a reach failure.

Replay

Run from packages/db on the recorded commit:

TANSTACK_DB_ORACLE_PROPERTY=ordered-loader.request-authority \
TANSTACK_DB_ORACLE_SEED=-845274422 \
TANSTACK_DB_ORACLE_PATH=2109:1:3:6:4:8:10:13:15 \
pnpm exec vitest run --coverage.enabled=false --typecheck.enabled=false \
  tests/query/ordered-source-loader-state-oracle.test.ts -t 'random campaign'

Keep this history in the shared comparison and exercise nearby synchronous repair, release-triggered truncate and joined-work histories before a production repair. Show RED on the original code, GREEN after repair and a hostile mutant that fails. A real Collection/provider receiving witness is needed before claiming the public resource consequence is closed.

Related loader retirement investigations: #2223 (failed request across cursor reset) and #2191 (request authority/retirement). This trace has only successful explicit settlements; identity with either earlier report is not established. It is separate from the publication-retention report #2294 and multi-tab Electric report #2281.

The maintainer explicitly approved recording this counterexample as a follow-up and retrying the first RC release while leaving the defect open. No test, comparison or run budget has been weakened. A passing retry does not close this issue.

主要语言
TypeScript
星标
4k
派生
277
平均合并
1 天 6 小时
30 天内合并 PR
199

环境准备

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

TanStack/db 的其他 Issue

查看 TanStack/db 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 TypeScript Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。