Subject order and missing DC attributes when signing intermediate CA with smallstep (Microsoft CA compatibility issue)
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
Bewertung
- Schwierigkeit
- 4/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 3-5 Tage
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 35/100
- Issue-Typ
- Bug
- Klarheit
- Muss geklärt werden
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Ruhig
- Tech-Stack
- go
- Bereich
- cryptography, security
Rechercherichtung
Start by reproducing the issue with the shown step certificate sign command, the intermediate CA CSR, and the custom template using .Insecure.CR.Subject. Compare the subject order and extensions in the CSR and issued certificate, then inspect the certificate-signing and template handling paths. Done means determining whether CSR subject order can be preserved and documenting or correcting the behavior without breaking the existing subject override.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Beschreibung
Hello!
- Vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction
- If you want to implement this feature, comment to let us know (we'll work with you on design, scheduling, etc.)
Issue details
Hi everyone,
I’m currently trying to use a smallstep root CA to sign a Microsoft Windows CA as a subordinate CA, but I’m running into issues with the subject field handling.
Here’s my setup:
I created a CSR for the Microsoft CA.
Then I signed it using my smallstep root CA with:
step certificate sign \ --profile intermediate-ca \ intermediate-ms.csr \ /etc/step-ca/certs/root_ca.crt \ /etc/step-ca/secrets/root_ca_key
Initially, the resulting certificate was missing required extensions like:
CDP (CRL Distribution Point)
AIA (Authority Information Access)
So I created a custom template:
{ "subject": {{ toJson .Insecure.CR.Subject }}, "sans": {{ toJson .SANs }}, "issuingCertificateURL": "http://xxx/root.crt", {{- if typeIs "*rsa.PublicKey" .Insecure.CR.PublicKey }} "keyUsage": ["keyEncipherment", "digitalSignature"], {{- else }} "keyUsage": ["digitalSignature"], {{- end }} "extKeyUsage": ["serverAuth", "clientAuth"], "basicConstraints": { "isCA": true, "maxPathLen": 0 }, "crlDistributionPoints": [ "http://xxx/root.crl" ] }
With this template, the extensions are now correct and accepted.
However, I’m facing a new issue with the subject:
In my CSR (.req), the subject looks like this:
CN=abc, DC=def, DC=ghi
When I use:
"subject": {{ toJson .Insecure.CR.Subject }}
the subject in the issued certificate becomes:
DC=ghi, DC=def, CN=abc
→ so all attributes are present, but the order is reversed.
If I instead use:
"subject": {{ toJson .Subject }}
then the resulting certificate only contains:
CN=abc
which makes sense because the template overrides the subject and only includes the CN.
Problem:
Microsoft CA seems to reject the certificate when the subject order is changed, even though the same attributes are present.
According to the documentation and discussions (e.g. issue #718), I expected .Insecure.CR.Subject to preserve the subject exactly as defined in the CSR — including the order — but that does not seem to be the case.
Questions:
Is the reordering of subject attributes when using .Insecure.CR.Subject expected behavior?
Is there any way to preserve the exact original subject order from the CSR?
Has anyone successfully used smallstep to sign a Microsoft subordinate CA certificate without running into this issue?
Any help would be greatly appreciated — I’m currently stuck on this.
Thanks!
Why is this needed?
The .Insecure.CR.Subject Option in templates doesn't work like it should.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Go
- Sterne
- 4.3k
- Forks
- 320
- Ø Merge
- 2 T. 3 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 11
Entwicklungsumgebung
- Kein Dockerfile und keine Docker-Compose-Datei
- Hat eine Pull-Request-Vorlage
- Beitragsleitfaden lesen
Erste Schritte
- Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
- Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Mehr aus smallstep/cli
-
bug needs triage
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 74/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
enhancement needs triage
Schwierigkeit 4/5 3-5 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 32/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
enhancement needs triage
Schwierigkeit 3/5 1-2 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 57/100
smallstep/cli#1713 · 1 Reaktion ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
enhancement needs triage
Schwierigkeit 4/5 3-5 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 35/100
smallstep/cli#1710 · 1 Kommentar · 1 Reaktion ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
[Bug]: `step ca provisioner add --ca-config` requires `--ca-url`/`--root` even for purely local/offline editsEvtl. vergeben @vulragrag-star hat das vor 51 Tagen übernommen. Offenbug needs triage
Schwierigkeit 4/5 3-5 Tage Anfängerfreundlichkeit 20/100
smallstep/cli#1705 · 1 Reaktion ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
Ähnliche Issues
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 78/100
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 67/100
adrianbrad/queue#92 ·
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 78/100
-
agent-ready area:skills
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 75/100
jmbarzee/temporal-architect#444 ·
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag
-
enhancement needs:sonnet ready-for-agent
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 78/100
Maintainer antworten meist innerhalb von 1 Tag