Subject order and missing DC attributes when signing intermediate CA with smallstep (Microsoft CA compatibility issue)
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 35/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Necesita aclaración
- Estado de actividad
- Tranquilo
- Stack tecnológico
- go
- Área
- cryptography, security
Línea de trabajo
Start by reproducing the issue with the shown step certificate sign command, the intermediate CA CSR, and the custom template using .Insecure.CR.Subject. Compare the subject order and extensions in the CSR and issued certificate, then inspect the certificate-signing and template handling paths. Done means determining whether CSR subject order can be preserved and documenting or correcting the behavior without breaking the existing subject override.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
Hello!
- Vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction
- If you want to implement this feature, comment to let us know (we'll work with you on design, scheduling, etc.)
Issue details
Hi everyone,
I’m currently trying to use a smallstep root CA to sign a Microsoft Windows CA as a subordinate CA, but I’m running into issues with the subject field handling.
Here’s my setup:
I created a CSR for the Microsoft CA.
Then I signed it using my smallstep root CA with:
step certificate sign \ --profile intermediate-ca \ intermediate-ms.csr \ /etc/step-ca/certs/root_ca.crt \ /etc/step-ca/secrets/root_ca_key
Initially, the resulting certificate was missing required extensions like:
CDP (CRL Distribution Point)
AIA (Authority Information Access)
So I created a custom template:
{ "subject": {{ toJson .Insecure.CR.Subject }}, "sans": {{ toJson .SANs }}, "issuingCertificateURL": "http://xxx/root.crt", {{- if typeIs "*rsa.PublicKey" .Insecure.CR.PublicKey }} "keyUsage": ["keyEncipherment", "digitalSignature"], {{- else }} "keyUsage": ["digitalSignature"], {{- end }} "extKeyUsage": ["serverAuth", "clientAuth"], "basicConstraints": { "isCA": true, "maxPathLen": 0 }, "crlDistributionPoints": [ "http://xxx/root.crl" ] }
With this template, the extensions are now correct and accepted.
However, I’m facing a new issue with the subject:
In my CSR (.req), the subject looks like this:
CN=abc, DC=def, DC=ghi
When I use:
"subject": {{ toJson .Insecure.CR.Subject }}
the subject in the issued certificate becomes:
DC=ghi, DC=def, CN=abc
→ so all attributes are present, but the order is reversed.
If I instead use:
"subject": {{ toJson .Subject }}
then the resulting certificate only contains:
CN=abc
which makes sense because the template overrides the subject and only includes the CN.
Problem:
Microsoft CA seems to reject the certificate when the subject order is changed, even though the same attributes are present.
According to the documentation and discussions (e.g. issue #718), I expected .Insecure.CR.Subject to preserve the subject exactly as defined in the CSR — including the order — but that does not seem to be the case.
Questions:
Is the reordering of subject attributes when using .Insecure.CR.Subject expected behavior?
Is there any way to preserve the exact original subject order from the CSR?
Has anyone successfully used smallstep to sign a Microsoft subordinate CA certificate without running into this issue?
Any help would be greatly appreciated — I’m currently stuck on this.
Thanks!
Why is this needed?
The .Insecure.CR.Subject Option in templates doesn't work like it should.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Go
- Estrellas
- 4.3k
- Forks
- 320
- Merge medio
- 2 d 3 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 11
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de smallstep/cli
-
[Bug]: `Match exec "step ssh check-host %h"` causes SSH connections through ProxyJump to hangAbiertobug needs triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 74/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
enhancement needs triage
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 32/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
enhancement needs triage
Dificultad 3/5 1-2 días Aptitud para principiantes 57/100
smallstep/cli#1713 · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
build s390x and riscv64 binariesAbiertoenhancement needs triage
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 35/100
smallstep/cli#1710 · 1 comentario · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
[Bug]: `step ca provisioner add --ca-config` requires `--ca-url`/`--root` even for purely local/offline editsPosiblemente ocupada @vulragrag-star la tomó hace 51 días. Abiertobug needs triage
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 20/100
smallstep/cli#1705 · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de smallstep/cli
Issues similares
-
agent-butler-finding bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
jordansmall/spindrift#6414 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 68/100
Icinga/icinga-kubernetes#294 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 4 días
-
Cluster details: the Control Plane version field has a different border color than its icon boxAbiertokind/design sig/ui
Dificultad 1/5 Menos de una hora Aptitud para principiantes 92/100
kubermatic/dashboard#8449 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
needs-triage
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 62/100
cli/cli#14962 · 1 comentario · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Model conformance driftAbiertomodel-drift
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 66/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día