Subject order and missing DC attributes when signing intermediate CA with smallstep (Microsoft CA compatibility issue)

Ouverte
#1,606 2 commentaires 1 réaction 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub

Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour

Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.

Évaluation

Difficulté
4/5
Temps estimé
3-5 jours
Accessibilité débutants
35/100
Type d'issue
Bug
Clarté
À clarifier
Activité
Calme
Stack technique
go

Piste de recherche

Start by reproducing the issue with the shown step certificate sign command, the intermediate CA CSR, and the custom template using .Insecure.CR.Subject. Compare the subject order and extensions in the CSR and issued certificate, then inspect the certificate-signing and template handling paths. Done means determining whether CSR subject order can be preserved and documenting or correcting the behavior without breaking the existing subject override.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.

Description

enhancement needs triage

Hello!

  • Vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction
  • If you want to implement this feature, comment to let us know (we'll work with you on design, scheduling, etc.)

Issue details

Hi everyone,

I’m currently trying to use a smallstep root CA to sign a Microsoft Windows CA as a subordinate CA, but I’m running into issues with the subject field handling.

Here’s my setup:

I created a CSR for the Microsoft CA.
Then I signed it using my smallstep root CA with:

step certificate sign \ --profile intermediate-ca \ intermediate-ms.csr \ /etc/step-ca/certs/root_ca.crt \ /etc/step-ca/secrets/root_ca_key

Initially, the resulting certificate was missing required extensions like:

CDP (CRL Distribution Point)
AIA (Authority Information Access)

So I created a custom template:

{ "subject": {{ toJson .Insecure.CR.Subject }}, "sans": {{ toJson .SANs }}, "issuingCertificateURL": "http://xxx/root.crt", {{- if typeIs "*rsa.PublicKey" .Insecure.CR.PublicKey }} "keyUsage": ["keyEncipherment", "digitalSignature"], {{- else }} "keyUsage": ["digitalSignature"], {{- end }} "extKeyUsage": ["serverAuth", "clientAuth"], "basicConstraints": { "isCA": true, "maxPathLen": 0 }, "crlDistributionPoints": [ "http://xxx/root.crl" ] }

With this template, the extensions are now correct and accepted.

However, I’m facing a new issue with the subject:

In my CSR (.req), the subject looks like this:

CN=abc, DC=def, DC=ghi

When I use:

"subject": {{ toJson .Insecure.CR.Subject }}

the subject in the issued certificate becomes:

DC=ghi, DC=def, CN=abc

→ so all attributes are present, but the order is reversed.
If I instead use:

"subject": {{ toJson .Subject }}

then the resulting certificate only contains:

CN=abc

which makes sense because the template overrides the subject and only includes the CN.

Problem:
Microsoft CA seems to reject the certificate when the subject order is changed, even though the same attributes are present.

According to the documentation and discussions (e.g. issue #718), I expected .Insecure.CR.Subject to preserve the subject exactly as defined in the CSR — including the order — but that does not seem to be the case.

Questions:

Is the reordering of subject attributes when using .Insecure.CR.Subject expected behavior?
Is there any way to preserve the exact original subject order from the CSR?
Has anyone successfully used smallstep to sign a Microsoft subordinate CA certificate without running into this issue?

Any help would be greatly appreciated — I’m currently stuck on this.

Thanks!

Image

Why is this needed?

The .Insecure.CR.Subject Option in templates doesn't work like it should.

Langage dominant
Go
Étoiles
4.3k
Forks
320
Merge moyen
2 j 3 h
PR mergées (30 j)
11

Préparer son environnement

Par où commencer

  1. Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
  2. Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
  3. Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
  4. Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.

Autres issues de smallstep/cli

Toutes les issues de smallstep/cli

Issues similaires

Plus d'issues Go

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.