Subject order and missing DC attributes when signing intermediate CA with smallstep (Microsoft CA compatibility issue)

Aberta
#1,606 2 comentários 1 reação 0 responsáveis Ver no GitHub

Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia

Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.

Avaliação

Dificuldade
4/5
Tempo estimado
3-5 dias
Facilidade para iniciantes
35/100
Tipo de issue
Bug
Clareza
Precisa de esclarecimento
Status de atividade
Pouca atividade
Stack de tecnologia
go

Direção de pesquisa

Start by reproducing the issue with the shown step certificate sign command, the intermediate CA CSR, and the custom template using .Insecure.CR.Subject. Compare the subject order and extensions in the CSR and issued certificate, then inspect the certificate-signing and template handling paths. Done means determining whether CSR subject order can be preserved and documenting or correcting the behavior without breaking the existing subject override.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.

Descrição

enhancement needs triage

Hello!

  • Vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction
  • If you want to implement this feature, comment to let us know (we'll work with you on design, scheduling, etc.)

Issue details

Hi everyone,

I’m currently trying to use a smallstep root CA to sign a Microsoft Windows CA as a subordinate CA, but I’m running into issues with the subject field handling.

Here’s my setup:

I created a CSR for the Microsoft CA.
Then I signed it using my smallstep root CA with:

step certificate sign \ --profile intermediate-ca \ intermediate-ms.csr \ /etc/step-ca/certs/root_ca.crt \ /etc/step-ca/secrets/root_ca_key

Initially, the resulting certificate was missing required extensions like:

CDP (CRL Distribution Point)
AIA (Authority Information Access)

So I created a custom template:

{ "subject": {{ toJson .Insecure.CR.Subject }}, "sans": {{ toJson .SANs }}, "issuingCertificateURL": "http://xxx/root.crt", {{- if typeIs "*rsa.PublicKey" .Insecure.CR.PublicKey }} "keyUsage": ["keyEncipherment", "digitalSignature"], {{- else }} "keyUsage": ["digitalSignature"], {{- end }} "extKeyUsage": ["serverAuth", "clientAuth"], "basicConstraints": { "isCA": true, "maxPathLen": 0 }, "crlDistributionPoints": [ "http://xxx/root.crl" ] }

With this template, the extensions are now correct and accepted.

However, I’m facing a new issue with the subject:

In my CSR (.req), the subject looks like this:

CN=abc, DC=def, DC=ghi

When I use:

"subject": {{ toJson .Insecure.CR.Subject }}

the subject in the issued certificate becomes:

DC=ghi, DC=def, CN=abc

→ so all attributes are present, but the order is reversed.
If I instead use:

"subject": {{ toJson .Subject }}

then the resulting certificate only contains:

CN=abc

which makes sense because the template overrides the subject and only includes the CN.

Problem:
Microsoft CA seems to reject the certificate when the subject order is changed, even though the same attributes are present.

According to the documentation and discussions (e.g. issue #718), I expected .Insecure.CR.Subject to preserve the subject exactly as defined in the CSR — including the order — but that does not seem to be the case.

Questions:

Is the reordering of subject attributes when using .Insecure.CR.Subject expected behavior?
Is there any way to preserve the exact original subject order from the CSR?
Has anyone successfully used smallstep to sign a Microsoft subordinate CA certificate without running into this issue?

Any help would be greatly appreciated — I’m currently stuck on this.

Thanks!

Image

Why is this needed?

The .Insecure.CR.Subject Option in templates doesn't work like it should.

Linguagem predominante
Go
Estrelas
4.3k
Forks
320
Merge médio
2d 3h
PRs com merge (30d)
11

Preparar o ambiente

Primeiros passos

  1. Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
  2. Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
  3. Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
  4. Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.

Mais de smallstep/cli

Todas as issues de smallstep/cli

Issues semelhantes

Mais issues de Go

Receba novas issues na sua caixa de entrada

Um resumo curto de issues do GitHub para quem está começando.