False Negative: CloseReader.ql misses unclosed streams once construction moves into helpers or alternate APIs.
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
Bewertung
- Schwierigkeit
- 4/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 3-5 Tage
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 48/100
Rechercherichtung
Beginne mit Likely Bugs/Resource Leaks/CloseReader.ql und vergleiche dessen Quellmodellierung mit den vier Beispielen: PosCase1_Var4.java, PosCase1_Var5.java, PosCase2.java und PosCase4.java. Führe die betroffenen Abfragetests aus und bestätige, dass jedes nicht geschlossene Helper-Ergebnis, jeder von einer Factory erzeugte Stream, jeder benutzerdefinierte InputStream und jeder BufferedReader-Wrapper gemeldet wird, ohne bestehende Fälle zu beeinträchtigen.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Beschreibung
Version
codeql 2.24.3
Checker
- Checker id:
Likely Bugs/Resource Leaks/CloseReader.ql - Checker description: This checker detects instances of Reader, InputStream, or ZipFile objects that are created but not guaranteed to be closed on method exit, potentially causing resource leaks.
Description of the false negative
All four samples still leave a reader or stream resource unclosed. The differences are superficial: one allocation is hidden behind a helper, one uses Files.newInputStream(...) instead of new FileInputStream(...), one leaks a custom InputStream, and one leaks a BufferedReader built around a parameter stream.
None of those variations change the resource-management obligation.
Affected test cases
PosCase1_Var4.java
The stream is created in openStream() and immediately discarded by the caller. That is still a leak.
PosCase1_Var5.java
Files.newInputStream(...) returns an InputStream that still needs to be closed.
PosCase2.java
The custom stream object is allocated, used, and never closed.
PosCase4.java
The BufferedReader wraps a parameter stream and is never closed, so the wrapper resource itself leaks.
Reproduction code
PosCase1_Var4.java
// FileInputStream created but not closed should be flagged as resource leak.
package scensct.var.pos;
import java.io.FileInputStream;
import java.io.IOException;
public class PosCase1_Var4 {
// Variant 4: Extract creation to a helper method
private FileInputStream openStream() throws IOException {
return new FileInputStream("test.txt");
}
public void readFile() throws IOException {
openStream(); // Returned stream is not assigned or closed
}
}
PosCase1_Var5.java
// FileInputStream created but not closed should be flagged as resource leak.
package scensct.var.pos;
import java.io.FileInputStream;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.nio.file.Files;
import java.nio.file.Paths;
public class PosCase1_Var5 {
// Variant 5: Use Files.newInputStream (still an InputStream)
public void readFile() throws IOException {
Files.newInputStream(Paths.get("test.txt"));
// Not closed
}
}
PosCase2.java
// Custom InputStream without close() method created but not closed should be flagged.
package scensct.core.pos;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.io.IOException;
public class PosCase2 {
// Custom InputStream that does not declare close()
static class CustomStream extends InputStream {
@Override
public int read() {
return -1;
}
// No close() method overridden
}
public void useStream() {
InputStream stream = new CustomStream(); // Instantiation with assignment
try {
stream.read(); // Use the stream to emphasize it's a resource
} catch (IOException e) {
// Ignore for test purposes
}
// Not closed
}
}
PosCase4.java
// Wrapper BufferedReader around parameter InputStream not closed should be flagged.
package scensct.core.pos;
import java.io.BufferedReader;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.io.InputStreamReader;
public class PosCase4 {
public void wrapParameter(InputStream paramStream) {
BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(paramStream)); // Wrapper assigned but not closed
}
}
Cause analysis
The misses point to incomplete source modeling in Likely Bugs/Resource Leaks/CloseReader.ql. The rule seems strongest on very direct allocation forms, but it loses coverage once the resource comes back from a helper or from another factory API.
That is a problem for a leak checker. Real code uses utility methods and alternative constructors all the time, and the need to close the returned resource does not disappear when the allocation becomes one step less direct.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- CodeQL
- Sterne
- 10.1k
- Forks
- 2.1k
- Ø Merge
- 2 T. 16 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 143
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
- Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Mehr aus github/codeql
-
agentic-workflows
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 70/100
-
false-positive javascript
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 84/100
-
C#: cs/simplifiable-boolean-expression false positive on Nullable<bool> compared with a literal Offen
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 82/100
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 78/100
-
false-positive
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 70/100
Ähnliche Issues
-
enhancement
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 70/100
canonical/paas-charm#368 · 1 Kommentar ·
-
enhancement
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 75/100
palladius/rails8-app-on-gcp#142 ·
-
Schwierigkeit 1/5 Unter einer Stunde Anfängerfreundlichkeit 90/100
StevenBlack/hosts#3256 ·
-
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 75/100
corsairdev/corsair#1764 ·
-
oblt-aw/detector/security
Schwierigkeit 2/5 1-3 Stunden Anfängerfreundlichkeit 70/100