False Negative: CloseReader.ql misses unclosed streams once construction moves into helpers or alternate APIs.
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
Évaluation
- Difficulté
- 4/5
- Temps estimé
- 3-5 jours
- Accessibilité débutants
- 48/100
Piste de recherche
Commencez par Likely Bugs/Resource Leaks/CloseReader.ql et comparez sa modélisation du code source avec les quatre exemples : PosCase1_Var4.java, PosCase1_Var5.java, PosCase2.java et PosCase4.java. Exécutez les tests de requête concernés et vérifiez que chaque résultat de helper non fermé, chaque stream créé par une factory, chaque InputStream personnalisé et chaque wrapper de BufferedReader est signalé, sans introduire de régression dans les cas existants.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Description
Version
codeql 2.24.3
Checker
- Checker id:
Likely Bugs/Resource Leaks/CloseReader.ql - Checker description: This checker detects instances of Reader, InputStream, or ZipFile objects that are created but not guaranteed to be closed on method exit, potentially causing resource leaks.
Description of the false negative
All four samples still leave a reader or stream resource unclosed. The differences are superficial: one allocation is hidden behind a helper, one uses Files.newInputStream(...) instead of new FileInputStream(...), one leaks a custom InputStream, and one leaks a BufferedReader built around a parameter stream.
None of those variations change the resource-management obligation.
Affected test cases
PosCase1_Var4.java
The stream is created in openStream() and immediately discarded by the caller. That is still a leak.
PosCase1_Var5.java
Files.newInputStream(...) returns an InputStream that still needs to be closed.
PosCase2.java
The custom stream object is allocated, used, and never closed.
PosCase4.java
The BufferedReader wraps a parameter stream and is never closed, so the wrapper resource itself leaks.
Reproduction code
PosCase1_Var4.java
// FileInputStream created but not closed should be flagged as resource leak.
package scensct.var.pos;
import java.io.FileInputStream;
import java.io.IOException;
public class PosCase1_Var4 {
// Variant 4: Extract creation to a helper method
private FileInputStream openStream() throws IOException {
return new FileInputStream("test.txt");
}
public void readFile() throws IOException {
openStream(); // Returned stream is not assigned or closed
}
}
PosCase1_Var5.java
// FileInputStream created but not closed should be flagged as resource leak.
package scensct.var.pos;
import java.io.FileInputStream;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.nio.file.Files;
import java.nio.file.Paths;
public class PosCase1_Var5 {
// Variant 5: Use Files.newInputStream (still an InputStream)
public void readFile() throws IOException {
Files.newInputStream(Paths.get("test.txt"));
// Not closed
}
}
PosCase2.java
// Custom InputStream without close() method created but not closed should be flagged.
package scensct.core.pos;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.io.IOException;
public class PosCase2 {
// Custom InputStream that does not declare close()
static class CustomStream extends InputStream {
@Override
public int read() {
return -1;
}
// No close() method overridden
}
public void useStream() {
InputStream stream = new CustomStream(); // Instantiation with assignment
try {
stream.read(); // Use the stream to emphasize it's a resource
} catch (IOException e) {
// Ignore for test purposes
}
// Not closed
}
}
PosCase4.java
// Wrapper BufferedReader around parameter InputStream not closed should be flagged.
package scensct.core.pos;
import java.io.BufferedReader;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.io.InputStreamReader;
public class PosCase4 {
public void wrapParameter(InputStream paramStream) {
BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(paramStream)); // Wrapper assigned but not closed
}
}
Cause analysis
The misses point to incomplete source modeling in Likely Bugs/Resource Leaks/CloseReader.ql. The rule seems strongest on very direct allocation forms, but it loses coverage once the resource comes back from a helper or from another factory API.
That is a problem for a leak checker. Real code uses utility methods and alternative constructors all the time, and the need to close the returned resource does not disappear when the allocation becomes one step less direct.
- Langage dominant
- CodeQL
- Étoiles
- 10.1k
- Forks
- 2.1k
- Merge moyen
- 2 j 16 h
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 143
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Autres issues de github/codeql
-
agentic-workflows
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 70/100
-
false-positive javascript
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 84/100
-
C#: cs/simplifiable-boolean-expression false positive on Nullable<bool> compared with a literal Ouverte
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 82/100
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 78/100
-
false-positive
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 70/100
Toutes les issues de github/codeql
Issues similaires
-
enhancement
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 70/100
canonical/paas-charm#368 · 1 commentaire ·
-
enhancement
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 75/100
palladius/rails8-app-on-gcp#142 ·
-
addition to tracking list Ouverte
Difficulté 1/5 Moins d'une heure Accessibilité débutants 90/100
StevenBlack/hosts#3256 ·
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 75/100
corsairdev/corsair#1764 ·
-
oblt-aw/detector/security
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 70/100