False Negative: CloseReader.ql misses unclosed streams once construction moves into helpers or alternate APIs.
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
调研方向
从 Likely Bugs/Resource Leaks/CloseReader.ql 开始,将其源代码建模与四个示例进行比较:PosCase1_Var4.java、PosCase1_Var5.java、PosCase2.java 和 PosCase4.java。运行受影响的查询测试,并确认每个未关闭的 helper 结果、每个由 factory 创建的 stream、每个自定义 InputStream 以及每个 BufferedReader wrapper 都会被报告,同时不会使现有用例发生回归。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Version
codeql 2.24.3
Checker
- Checker id:
Likely Bugs/Resource Leaks/CloseReader.ql - Checker description: This checker detects instances of Reader, InputStream, or ZipFile objects that are created but not guaranteed to be closed on method exit, potentially causing resource leaks.
Description of the false negative
All four samples still leave a reader or stream resource unclosed. The differences are superficial: one allocation is hidden behind a helper, one uses Files.newInputStream(...) instead of new FileInputStream(...), one leaks a custom InputStream, and one leaks a BufferedReader built around a parameter stream.
None of those variations change the resource-management obligation.
Affected test cases
PosCase1_Var4.java
The stream is created in openStream() and immediately discarded by the caller. That is still a leak.
PosCase1_Var5.java
Files.newInputStream(...) returns an InputStream that still needs to be closed.
PosCase2.java
The custom stream object is allocated, used, and never closed.
PosCase4.java
The BufferedReader wraps a parameter stream and is never closed, so the wrapper resource itself leaks.
Reproduction code
PosCase1_Var4.java
// FileInputStream created but not closed should be flagged as resource leak.
package scensct.var.pos;
import java.io.FileInputStream;
import java.io.IOException;
public class PosCase1_Var4 {
// Variant 4: Extract creation to a helper method
private FileInputStream openStream() throws IOException {
return new FileInputStream("test.txt");
}
public void readFile() throws IOException {
openStream(); // Returned stream is not assigned or closed
}
}
PosCase1_Var5.java
// FileInputStream created but not closed should be flagged as resource leak.
package scensct.var.pos;
import java.io.FileInputStream;
import java.io.IOException;
import java.nio.file.Files;
import java.nio.file.Paths;
public class PosCase1_Var5 {
// Variant 5: Use Files.newInputStream (still an InputStream)
public void readFile() throws IOException {
Files.newInputStream(Paths.get("test.txt"));
// Not closed
}
}
PosCase2.java
// Custom InputStream without close() method created but not closed should be flagged.
package scensct.core.pos;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.io.IOException;
public class PosCase2 {
// Custom InputStream that does not declare close()
static class CustomStream extends InputStream {
@Override
public int read() {
return -1;
}
// No close() method overridden
}
public void useStream() {
InputStream stream = new CustomStream(); // Instantiation with assignment
try {
stream.read(); // Use the stream to emphasize it's a resource
} catch (IOException e) {
// Ignore for test purposes
}
// Not closed
}
}
PosCase4.java
// Wrapper BufferedReader around parameter InputStream not closed should be flagged.
package scensct.core.pos;
import java.io.BufferedReader;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.io.InputStreamReader;
public class PosCase4 {
public void wrapParameter(InputStream paramStream) {
BufferedReader reader = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(paramStream)); // Wrapper assigned but not closed
}
}
Cause analysis
The misses point to incomplete source modeling in Likely Bugs/Resource Leaks/CloseReader.ql. The rule seems strongest on very direct allocation forms, but it loses coverage once the resource comes back from a helper or from another factory API.
That is a problem for a leak checker. Real code uses utility methods and alternative constructors all the time, and the need to close the returned resource does not disappear when the allocation becomes one step less direct.
- 主要语言
- CodeQL
- 星标
- 10.1k
- 派生
- 2.1k
- 平均合并
- 2 天 16 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 143
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
github/codeql 的其他 Issue
-
agentic-workflows
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
-
false-positive javascript
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 84/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
-
false-positive
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
punkpeye/mcp-remote#369 ·
-
Mend: dependency security vulnerability untriaged
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 86/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
-
bug
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 90/100
cisagov/vulnrichment#337 ·
-
bug DUP Reservations
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 68/100
bcgov/reserve-rec-public#896 ·