[Feature] Bypass manifest lists on exact snapshot live-entry cache hits

Offen
#375 0 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 1 zugewiesene Person Auf GitHub ansehen

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

Bewertung

Schwierigkeit
4/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
3-5 Tage
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
30/100
Issue-Typ
Feature
Klarheit
Größtenteils klar
Aktivitätsstatus
Veraltet
Tech-Stack
cpp
Bereich
databases

Rechercherichtung

Start with AppendOnlyFileStoreScanTest.TestSnapshotLiveManifestCachePath and the public orc/append_09.db/append_09 fixture, using snapshot 5 and bucket 0 to reproduce the cache-hit path. Review draft implementation #374 and its focused regression tests for manifest-cache access counts, changed predicates, eviction/rebuild, and retained file counts. Done means eligible exact hits skip manifest reads and decoding while misses rebuild completely and filters, snapshot identity, and metrics remain correct.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Beschreibung

Search before asking
  • I searched existing issues and found no report of this exact-hit planning overhead.
Motivation

Repeated scans of the same snapshot and bucket still read and decode the manifest lists before checking the snapshot live-manifest-entry cache. The cached live entries already contain the state needed for that bucket, so this work adds avoidable CPU and metadata access to repeated point-read planning.

To reproduce, use the public orc/append_09.db/append_09 test fixture with snapshot 5 and bucket 0, enable the snapshot live-manifest-entry cache, and reuse one cache across two scans. Instrument the MANIFEST cache accesses, as in AppendOnlyFileStoreScanTest.TestSnapshotLiveManifestCachePath. Before the proposed change, the second scan revisits the manifest-list path even though its exact snapshot/bucket live-entry lookup hits.

Expected: an eligible exact hit bypasses manifest-list reads and decoding, while each request still applies its own filters. A miss must rebuild the complete bucket. Snapshot selection and the existing snapshot-identity validation must remain intact.

Solution

Resolve the snapshot first and consult the existing snapshot live-entry cache before reading manifest lists. Retain the table file count in the transient cached payload so skipped-file metrics remain correct; report zero scanned manifests for an exact hit. Version the transient payload so incompatible entries fall back to rebuilding.

Draft implementation: #374. Regression tests check the manifest-cache access count, changed predicates, eviction/rebuild, and retained file counts. This change does not introduce a filesystem block cache or alter the persisted table format.

Anything else?

The identical patch passed 88 focused tests in a downstream C++17 Release build. Upstream CI for the draft still requires maintainer approval; no standalone end-to-end performance uplift is claimed for this individual optimization.

Are you willing to submit a PR?
  • I am willing to submit a PR; #374 is available as a draft.
Vorherrschende Sprache
C++
Sterne
65
Forks
29
Ø Merge
2 T. 30 Min.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
77

Beitragsleitfaden

Beitragsleitfaden öffnen

Erste Schritte

  1. Lesen Sie das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreiben Sie ins Issue, dass Sie es übernehmen — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forken Sie das Repository und arbeiten Sie in einem Branch.
  4. Öffnen Sie einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Mehr aus apache/paimon-cpp

Alle Issues in apache/paimon-cpp

Ähnliche Issues

Weitere Issues zu C++

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.