Add maintainer/collaborator of this repository from bytecodealliance
Maintainers usually reply within 7 days
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 8/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Active
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- operating-systems
Research direction
The payload names no files, tests or entry points, and the request is a governance decision about who maintains the crate, not a code change. Read the repository's existing maintainer or contribution notes to see how collaborators are added, and look for any response from the current maintainers. Done means a maintainer has answered whether they will add collaborators, not that the repository has changed.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
It seems this crate is not actively fixed. However, this crate is widely used via clap-rs. Would you consider adding maintainers from bytecodealliance or somewhere else?
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 2.1k
- Forks
- 308
- Avg merge
- 14d 5h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 5
Getting set up
- No Dockerfile or Docker Compose file
- No pull request template
- Read the contributing guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from bytecodealliance/rustix
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
bytecodealliance/rustix#1706 · 4 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 7 days
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
bytecodealliance/rustix#1703 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 7 days
-
net feature alone fails to compile in 1.1.5: sockopt uses crate::timespec, which net does not gate inMay be free again A pull request for this issue was closed without being merged. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
bytecodealliance/rustix#1689 · 3 comments ·
Maintainers usually reply within 7 days
-
Wrong flag used for (set_)ipv6_multicast_hopsPossibly taken @RajaBabu15 claimed this 63 days ago. Open
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
bytecodealliance/rustix#1660 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 7 days
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
bytecodealliance/rustix#1635 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 7 days
All issues in bytecodealliance/rustix
Similar issues
-
type/bug
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
stackabletech/operator-rs#1301 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
jmcnamara/rust_xlsxwriter#205 · 4 comments ·
-
agent:triaged bug bughunt pm:pipenv priority:p1
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 78/100
SocketDev/socket-patch#1608 · 1 comment ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
adorsys/status-list-server#698 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 2 days
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 70/100
nannou-org/egui_graph#92 ·
Maintainers usually reply within 1 day