RCE via `pickle.loads` on analysis-cache MANIFEST file (`ReadAnalysisCacheFromFS`)
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 新手友好度
- 35/100
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- python, tensorflow
调研方向
Read analyzer_cache.py around lines 107, 181, and 359–408, tracing how the MANIFEST and METADATA files are read and deserialized. The issue proposes replacing pickle serialization with JSON or protobuf and bumping the cache version; check existing cache format tests and add coverage for both file paths. Done means cache reads no longer deserialize attacker-controlled pickle data while preserving the documented cache behavior.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
RCE via pickle.loads on analysis-cache MANIFEST file (ReadAnalysisCacheFromFS)
Note: This was reported to Google via the OSS VRP on 2026-10-11 (issue 572481371) and closed as "Won't Fix (Intended Behavior)". Filing here for public transparency so users of shared cache storage are aware of the risk.
Summary
ReadAnalysisCacheFromFS deserialises the cache MANIFEST file with pickle.loads at pipeline-construction time on the driver machine, with no validation or class allowlist. An attacker who can write to the cache directory (shared GCS bucket, NFS, or any writable path) can plant a malicious MANIFEST and achieve arbitrary code execution on every machine that runs a pipeline against that cache — including CI workers and production training hosts.
Affected code — tensorflow-transform
| Location | Issue |
|---|---|
analyzer_cache.py:181 |
result = pickle.loads(manifest_file_handle.read()) — MANIFEST deserialised on the driver at graph-construction time |
analyzer_cache.py:107 |
pickle.loads on METADATA TFRecords — fires on Beam workers |
Taint path
analyzer_cache.py:199 tf.io.gfile.GFile(self._manifest_path, 'rb')
← attacker controls <cache_base_dir>/<dataset_key>/MANIFEST bytes
analyzer_cache.py:359-390 ReadAnalysisCacheFromFS(cache_base_dir, dataset_keys)
← public PTransform, standard documented usage
analyzer_cache.py:400-408 expand() → manifest_file.read()
fires on the DRIVER before the pipeline runs
analyzer_cache.py:181 result = pickle.loads(manifest_file_handle.read()) ← SINK 1
analyzer_cache.py:107 pickle.loads on METADATA TFRecords ← SINK 2 (workers)
Proof of concept
# Attacker plants a malicious MANIFEST in the shared cache directory
import pickle, os, pathlib
class Exploit:
def __reduce__(self):
return (os.system, ("id > /tmp/pwned",))
cache_dir = pathlib.Path("/shared/tft-cache/span-0")
cache_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
(cache_dir / "MANIFEST").write_bytes(pickle.dumps(Exploit()))
# Next pipeline run pointing at cache_dir:
# ReadAnalysisCacheFromFS(...) → pickle.loads → arbitrary code execution
The same __reduce__ payload in a METADATA-00000-of-00001 TFRecord hits the secondary sink in Beam workers.
Impact
| Dimension | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Attack vector | Network (shared cloud storage) |
| Attack complexity | Low — write a pickle payload to one file |
| Privileges required | Write access to cache directory only |
| User interaction | None — fires automatically on next pipeline run |
| Scope | Driver machine + all Beam workers |
In a typical ML platform deployment this means full compromise of the training environment: cloud credentials attached to the compute instance (GCP service account, AWS IAM role), model weights, training data, secrets in environment variables, and the ability to tamper with pipeline outputs.
Why this is not equivalent to loading an untrusted model
TFT's own documentation and TF's SECURITY.md warn that loading untrusted SavedModels is unsafe. Cache files are different — they are infrastructure artifacts written by one pipeline run and read by the next, often across team boundaries on shared GCS storage. Users have no reason to expect pickle.loads when reading a pipeline cache.
Fix
The MANIFEST is a simple dict[str, str]. Replace pickle with JSON or protobuf — both sinks disappear with no semantic change to the cache format. A cache-version bump handles backward compatibility. DatasetCacheMetadata (strings and ints only) is equally trivial to serialise without pickle.
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 991
- 派生
- 226
- PR 合并指标
- 30 天内没有已合并 PR
环境准备
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 没有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
tensorflow/transform 的其他 Issue
-
stat:contributions welcome type:bug
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 45/100
tensorflow/transform#347 ·
-
scale_to_z_score_per_key should give caller control over OOV behavior可能重新可做 @iindyk 于 1827 天前认领,目前没有进行中的 PR。 未关闭stat:contributions welcome type:feature
tensorflow/transform#252 · 6 条评论 · 已指派 2 人 ·
-
Table not initialized when serving model可能重新可做 @varshaan 于 2022 天前认领,目前没有进行中的 PR。 未关闭Etsy stat:contributions welcome
tensorflow/transform#237 · 11 条评论 · 已指派 1 人 ·
-
tft.apply_saved_model raises ValueError when running beam pipeline可能重新可做 @varshaan 于 2042 天前认领,目前没有进行中的 PR。 未关闭stat:awaiting tensorflower type:support
tensorflow/transform#231 · 7 条评论 · 已指派 2 人 ·
查看 tensorflow/transform 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
难度 1/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug documentation good first issue help wanted testing
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 84/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Show evidence time and supersede warnings in the memory inspector可能已有人在做 @Sinchanak-212 今天认领。 未关闭area: ux good first issue priority: medium
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 84/100
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 86/100
daniel-ospina/tortoise#11649 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 86/100
ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills#2438 ·
维护者通常 15 天内回复