RCE via `pickle.loads` on analysis-cache MANIFEST file (`ReadAnalysisCacheFromFS`)

未關閉
  • 哪裡不對？
#354 0 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
4/5
預估耗時
3-5 天
新手友好度
35/100
Issue 類型
缺陷
描述清晰度
描述清楚
活躍度
活躍
技術堆疊
python, tensorflow
領域
data-engineering, security

研究方向

Read analyzer_cache.py around lines 107, 181, and 359–408, tracing how the MANIFEST and METADATA files are read and deserialized. The issue proposes replacing pickle serialization with JSON or protobuf and bumping the cache version; check existing cache format tests and add coverage for both file paths. Done means cache reads no longer deserialize attacker-controlled pickle data while preserving the documented cache behavior.

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

bug

RCE via pickle.loads on analysis-cache MANIFEST file (ReadAnalysisCacheFromFS)

Note: This was reported to Google via the OSS VRP on 2026-10-11 (issue 572481371) and closed as "Won't Fix (Intended Behavior)". Filing here for public transparency so users of shared cache storage are aware of the risk.

Summary

ReadAnalysisCacheFromFS deserialises the cache MANIFEST file with pickle.loads at pipeline-construction time on the driver machine, with no validation or class allowlist. An attacker who can write to the cache directory (shared GCS bucket, NFS, or any writable path) can plant a malicious MANIFEST and achieve arbitrary code execution on every machine that runs a pipeline against that cache — including CI workers and production training hosts.

Affected code — tensorflow-transform

Location Issue
analyzer_cache.py:181 result = pickle.loads(manifest_file_handle.read()) — MANIFEST deserialised on the driver at graph-construction time
analyzer_cache.py:107 pickle.loads on METADATA TFRecords — fires on Beam workers

Taint path

analyzer_cache.py:199    tf.io.gfile.GFile(self._manifest_path, 'rb')
                         ← attacker controls <cache_base_dir>/<dataset_key>/MANIFEST bytes

analyzer_cache.py:359-390  ReadAnalysisCacheFromFS(cache_base_dir, dataset_keys)
                            ← public PTransform, standard documented usage

analyzer_cache.py:400-408  expand() → manifest_file.read()
                            fires on the DRIVER before the pipeline runs

analyzer_cache.py:181      result = pickle.loads(manifest_file_handle.read())   ← SINK 1
analyzer_cache.py:107      pickle.loads on METADATA TFRecords                   ← SINK 2 (workers)

Proof of concept

# Attacker plants a malicious MANIFEST in the shared cache directory
import pickle, os, pathlib

class Exploit:
    def __reduce__(self):
        return (os.system, ("id > /tmp/pwned",))

cache_dir = pathlib.Path("/shared/tft-cache/span-0")
cache_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
(cache_dir / "MANIFEST").write_bytes(pickle.dumps(Exploit()))

# Next pipeline run pointing at cache_dir:
#   ReadAnalysisCacheFromFS(...) → pickle.loads → arbitrary code execution

The same __reduce__ payload in a METADATA-00000-of-00001 TFRecord hits the secondary sink in Beam workers.

Impact

Dimension Assessment
Attack vector Network (shared cloud storage)
Attack complexity Low — write a pickle payload to one file
Privileges required Write access to cache directory only
User interaction None — fires automatically on next pipeline run
Scope Driver machine + all Beam workers

In a typical ML platform deployment this means full compromise of the training environment: cloud credentials attached to the compute instance (GCP service account, AWS IAM role), model weights, training data, secrets in environment variables, and the ability to tamper with pipeline outputs.

Why this is not equivalent to loading an untrusted model

TFT's own documentation and TF's SECURITY.md warn that loading untrusted SavedModels is unsafe. Cache files are different — they are infrastructure artifacts written by one pipeline run and read by the next, often across team boundaries on shared GCS storage. Users have no reason to expect pickle.loads when reading a pipeline cache.

Fix

The MANIFEST is a simple dict[str, str]. Replace pickle with JSON or protobuf — both sinks disappear with no semantic change to the cache format. A cache-version bump handles backward compatibility. DatasetCacheMetadata (strings and ints only) is equally trivial to serialise without pickle.

主要語言
Python
星號
991
分支
226
30 天內沒有已合併 PR

環境準備

  • 沒有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 檔案
  • 沒有 Pull Request 範本
  • 閱讀貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue，再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫，在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request，並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

tensorflow/transform 的其他 Issue

查看 tensorflow/transform 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。