Hacktoberfest 2026：维护者为十月标记出来的 issue，仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

[aw] Rust Code Quality Reviewer failed

未关闭
  • 哪里不对？
#2,295 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 6 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
45/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
github-actions, rust
领域
ci-cd, devtools

调研方向

Start with the linked Rust Code Quality Reviewer workflow, .github/workflows/review-rust.md, and inspect the failed run and its output. The issue points to an unexpected Copilot engine termination while reviewing PR #2222, but does not identify a specific code change to make. Follow the linked debugging prompt and determine whether the workflow or agent failure is reproducible; done means the cause is addressed or the workflow no longer reports the failure.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

agentic-workflows
Workflow Failure

Workflow: Rust Code Quality Reviewer
Branch: copilot/find-safe-output-gh-aw
Run: https://github.com/githubnext/ado-aw/actions/runs/37463239410
Pull Request: #2222

[!WARNING]
Engine Failure: The copilot engine terminated unexpectedly.

Last agent output:

  │ git show pr-2222:src/execute.rs | grep -n "fn append_execution_record_impl" -A 40
  └ 41 lines…
● cd /home/runner/work/ado-aw/ado-aw                                                          (shel…
  git show pr-2222:src/safe_outputs/mark_pull_request_as_ready_for_review.rs | sed -n '1,60p'
  │ cd /home/runner/work/ado-aw/ado-aw
  │ git show pr-2222:src/safe_outputs/mark_pull_request_as_ready_for_review.rs | sed -n '1,60p'
  └ 60 lines…
This is a huge, carefully tested PR. Checking rust-critic again.
Not in diff scope (pre-existing). I have enough context. Let me now confirm the `legacy_family` single-child case: if there's exactly 1 child, requiring a budget group for it might be overly strict but that's design, not a bug per se.
Let's check ado_script.rs condition removal impact more carefully — is there a risk this causes PR-triggered builds to run resolve-synthetic-pr unnecessarily (not a bug, intentional per test change)?That's handled by the bundle's own skip logic — fine, condition removal appears intentional and consistent with comment. Now let's finalize findings based on real issues found.This is unchanged/pre-existing, not part of diff. Good. Now I'll check the `validate_submit_pr_review_events` bug: when `obj.contains_key(LEGACY_PR_CONFIG)`, it bails with a generic message about "update-pr enables vote" but the actual key here is submit-pull-request-review's config — is that the legacy nested metadata, i.e. checking correctly? Let's verify LEGACY_PR_CONFIG purpose.That's legitimate — legacy-update-pr nested within submit-pull-request-review's config when migrated from update-pr's vote operation. Message is correct in that context.
Action Required

Assign this issue to an agent to debug and fix the issue.

Debug with any coding agent

Use this prompt with any coding agent (GitHub Copilot, Claude, Gemini, etc.):

Debug the agentic workflow failure using https://raw.githubusercontent.com/github/gh-aw/main/debug.md

The failed workflow run is at https://github.com/githubnext/ado-aw/actions/runs/37463239410
Manually invoke the agent

Debug this workflow failure using your favorite Agent CLI and the agentic-workflows prompt.

[!TIP]

Stop reporting this workflow as a failure

To stop a workflow from creating failure issues, set report-failure-as-issue: false in its frontmatter:

safe-outputs:
  report-failure-as-issue: false

Generated from Rust Code Quality Reviewer · 1.4K AIC · ◷

  • expires on Oct 13, 2026, 12:50 PM UTC
主要语言
Rust
星标
27
派生
8
平均合并
3 天 20 小时
30 天内合并 PR
10

环境准备

  • 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
  • 有 Pull Request 模板
  • 没有贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

githubnext/ado-aw 的其他 Issue

查看 githubnext/ado-aw 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Rust Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。