Hacktoberfest 2026：メンテナが10月に向けて印を付けた、オープンで初心者向けの issue。 Hacktoberfest の issue を見る

[aw] Rust Code Quality Reviewer failed

オープン
  • 何か問題がありますか？
#2,295 コメント 0 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

メンテナーはふだん 6 日以内に返信

まだ誰も着手していません。

評価

難易度
4/5
見積もり時間
3〜5日
初心者へのやさしさ
45/100
issue の種類
バグ
明瞭さ
おおむね明確
活発さ
活発
技術スタック
github-actions, rust
領域
ci-cd, devtools

調査の方向性

Start with the linked Rust Code Quality Reviewer workflow, .github/workflows/review-rust.md, and inspect the failed run and its output. The issue points to an unexpected Copilot engine termination while reviewing PR #2222, but does not identify a specific code change to make. Follow the linked debugging prompt and determine whether the workflow or agent failure is reproducible; done means the cause is addressed or the workflow no longer reports the failure.

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

説明

agentic-workflows
Workflow Failure

Workflow: Rust Code Quality Reviewer
Branch: copilot/find-safe-output-gh-aw
Run: https://github.com/githubnext/ado-aw/actions/runs/37463239410
Pull Request: #2222

[!WARNING]
Engine Failure: The copilot engine terminated unexpectedly.

Last agent output:

  │ git show pr-2222:src/execute.rs | grep -n "fn append_execution_record_impl" -A 40
  └ 41 lines…
● cd /home/runner/work/ado-aw/ado-aw                                                          (shel…
  git show pr-2222:src/safe_outputs/mark_pull_request_as_ready_for_review.rs | sed -n '1,60p'
  │ cd /home/runner/work/ado-aw/ado-aw
  │ git show pr-2222:src/safe_outputs/mark_pull_request_as_ready_for_review.rs | sed -n '1,60p'
  └ 60 lines…
This is a huge, carefully tested PR. Checking rust-critic again.
Not in diff scope (pre-existing). I have enough context. Let me now confirm the `legacy_family` single-child case: if there's exactly 1 child, requiring a budget group for it might be overly strict but that's design, not a bug per se.
Let's check ado_script.rs condition removal impact more carefully — is there a risk this causes PR-triggered builds to run resolve-synthetic-pr unnecessarily (not a bug, intentional per test change)?That's handled by the bundle's own skip logic — fine, condition removal appears intentional and consistent with comment. Now let's finalize findings based on real issues found.This is unchanged/pre-existing, not part of diff. Good. Now I'll check the `validate_submit_pr_review_events` bug: when `obj.contains_key(LEGACY_PR_CONFIG)`, it bails with a generic message about "update-pr enables vote" but the actual key here is submit-pull-request-review's config — is that the legacy nested metadata, i.e. checking correctly? Let's verify LEGACY_PR_CONFIG purpose.That's legitimate — legacy-update-pr nested within submit-pull-request-review's config when migrated from update-pr's vote operation. Message is correct in that context.
Action Required

Assign this issue to an agent to debug and fix the issue.

Debug with any coding agent

Use this prompt with any coding agent (GitHub Copilot, Claude, Gemini, etc.):

Debug the agentic workflow failure using https://raw.githubusercontent.com/github/gh-aw/main/debug.md

The failed workflow run is at https://github.com/githubnext/ado-aw/actions/runs/37463239410
Manually invoke the agent

Debug this workflow failure using your favorite Agent CLI and the agentic-workflows prompt.

[!TIP]

Stop reporting this workflow as a failure

To stop a workflow from creating failure issues, set report-failure-as-issue: false in its frontmatter:

safe-outputs:
  report-failure-as-issue: false

Generated from Rust Code Quality Reviewer · 1.4K AIC · ◷

  • expires on Oct 13, 2026, 12:50 PM UTC
主要言語
Rust
スター
27
フォーク
8
平均マージ
3日 20時間
マージ済み PR（30日）
10

環境構築

  • Dockerfile・Docker Compose ファイルなし
  • プルリクエストのテンプレートあり
  • コントリビューションガイドなし

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

githubnext/ado-aw のほかの issue

githubnext/ado-aw の issue をすべて見る

似ている issue

Rust の issue をもっと見る

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。