Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

[aw] Rust Code Quality Reviewer failed

Aperta
  • Qualcosa non va?
#2,295 0 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 6 giorni

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
4/5
Tempo stimato
3-5 giorni
Idoneità per principianti
45/100
Tipo di issue
Bug
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Stato di attività
Attiva
Stack tecnologico
github-actions, rust
Ambito
ci-cd, devtools

Direzione di ricerca

Start with the linked Rust Code Quality Reviewer workflow, .github/workflows/review-rust.md, and inspect the failed run and its output. The issue points to an unexpected Copilot engine termination while reviewing PR #2222, but does not identify a specific code change to make. Follow the linked debugging prompt and determine whether the workflow or agent failure is reproducible; done means the cause is addressed or the workflow no longer reports the failure.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

agentic-workflows
Workflow Failure

Workflow: Rust Code Quality Reviewer
Branch: copilot/find-safe-output-gh-aw
Run: https://github.com/githubnext/ado-aw/actions/runs/37463239410
Pull Request: #2222

[!WARNING]
Engine Failure: The copilot engine terminated unexpectedly.

Last agent output:

  │ git show pr-2222:src/execute.rs | grep -n "fn append_execution_record_impl" -A 40
  └ 41 lines…
● cd /home/runner/work/ado-aw/ado-aw                                                          (shel…
  git show pr-2222:src/safe_outputs/mark_pull_request_as_ready_for_review.rs | sed -n '1,60p'
  │ cd /home/runner/work/ado-aw/ado-aw
  │ git show pr-2222:src/safe_outputs/mark_pull_request_as_ready_for_review.rs | sed -n '1,60p'
  └ 60 lines…
This is a huge, carefully tested PR. Checking rust-critic again.
Not in diff scope (pre-existing). I have enough context. Let me now confirm the `legacy_family` single-child case: if there's exactly 1 child, requiring a budget group for it might be overly strict but that's design, not a bug per se.
Let's check ado_script.rs condition removal impact more carefully — is there a risk this causes PR-triggered builds to run resolve-synthetic-pr unnecessarily (not a bug, intentional per test change)?That's handled by the bundle's own skip logic — fine, condition removal appears intentional and consistent with comment. Now let's finalize findings based on real issues found.This is unchanged/pre-existing, not part of diff. Good. Now I'll check the `validate_submit_pr_review_events` bug: when `obj.contains_key(LEGACY_PR_CONFIG)`, it bails with a generic message about "update-pr enables vote" but the actual key here is submit-pull-request-review's config — is that the legacy nested metadata, i.e. checking correctly? Let's verify LEGACY_PR_CONFIG purpose.That's legitimate — legacy-update-pr nested within submit-pull-request-review's config when migrated from update-pr's vote operation. Message is correct in that context.
Action Required

Assign this issue to an agent to debug and fix the issue.

Debug with any coding agent

Use this prompt with any coding agent (GitHub Copilot, Claude, Gemini, etc.):

Debug the agentic workflow failure using https://raw.githubusercontent.com/github/gh-aw/main/debug.md

The failed workflow run is at https://github.com/githubnext/ado-aw/actions/runs/37463239410
Manually invoke the agent

Debug this workflow failure using your favorite Agent CLI and the agentic-workflows prompt.

[!TIP]

Stop reporting this workflow as a failure

To stop a workflow from creating failure issues, set report-failure-as-issue: false in its frontmatter:

safe-outputs:
  report-failure-as-issue: false

Generated from Rust Code Quality Reviewer · 1.4K AIC · ◷

  • expires on Oct 13, 2026, 12:50 PM UTC
Lingua principale
Rust
Stelle
27
Fork
8
Merge medio
3g 20h
PR unite (30g)
10

Preparare l'ambiente

  • Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
  • Ha un modello di pull request
  • Nessuna guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di githubnext/ado-aw

Tutte le issue di githubnext/ado-aw

Issue simili

Altre issue su Rust

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.