Hacktoberfest 2026: los issues que los mantenedores marcaron para octubre, abiertos y aptos para principiantes. Explorar issues de Hacktoberfest

[aw] Rust Code Quality Reviewer failed

Cerrado
  • ¿Algo no está bien?
#2,295 0 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub

Los mantenedores suelen responder en 2 días

Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.

Evaluación

Dificultad
4/5
Tiempo estimado
3-5 días
Aptitud para principiantes
45/100
Tipo de issue
Error
Claridad
Bastante claro
Estado de actividad
Activo
Stack tecnológico
github-actions, rust
Área
ci-cd, devtools

Línea de trabajo

Start with the linked Rust Code Quality Reviewer workflow, .github/workflows/review-rust.md, and inspect the failed run and its output. The issue points to an unexpected Copilot engine termination while reviewing PR #2222, but does not identify a specific code change to make. Follow the linked debugging prompt and determine whether the workflow or agent failure is reproducible; done means the cause is addressed or the workflow no longer reports the failure.

Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.

Descripción

agentic-workflows
Workflow Failure

Workflow: Rust Code Quality Reviewer
Branch: copilot/find-safe-output-gh-aw
Run: https://github.com/githubnext/ado-aw/actions/runs/37463239410
Pull Request: #2222

[!WARNING]
Engine Failure: The copilot engine terminated unexpectedly.

Last agent output:

  │ git show pr-2222:src/execute.rs | grep -n "fn append_execution_record_impl" -A 40
  └ 41 lines…
● cd /home/runner/work/ado-aw/ado-aw                                                          (shel…
  git show pr-2222:src/safe_outputs/mark_pull_request_as_ready_for_review.rs | sed -n '1,60p'
  │ cd /home/runner/work/ado-aw/ado-aw
  │ git show pr-2222:src/safe_outputs/mark_pull_request_as_ready_for_review.rs | sed -n '1,60p'
  └ 60 lines…
This is a huge, carefully tested PR. Checking rust-critic again.
Not in diff scope (pre-existing). I have enough context. Let me now confirm the `legacy_family` single-child case: if there's exactly 1 child, requiring a budget group for it might be overly strict but that's design, not a bug per se.
Let's check ado_script.rs condition removal impact more carefully — is there a risk this causes PR-triggered builds to run resolve-synthetic-pr unnecessarily (not a bug, intentional per test change)?That's handled by the bundle's own skip logic — fine, condition removal appears intentional and consistent with comment. Now let's finalize findings based on real issues found.This is unchanged/pre-existing, not part of diff. Good. Now I'll check the `validate_submit_pr_review_events` bug: when `obj.contains_key(LEGACY_PR_CONFIG)`, it bails with a generic message about "update-pr enables vote" but the actual key here is submit-pull-request-review's config — is that the legacy nested metadata, i.e. checking correctly? Let's verify LEGACY_PR_CONFIG purpose.That's legitimate — legacy-update-pr nested within submit-pull-request-review's config when migrated from update-pr's vote operation. Message is correct in that context.
Action Required

Assign this issue to an agent to debug and fix the issue.

Debug with any coding agent

Use this prompt with any coding agent (GitHub Copilot, Claude, Gemini, etc.):

Debug the agentic workflow failure using https://raw.githubusercontent.com/github/gh-aw/main/debug.md

The failed workflow run is at https://github.com/githubnext/ado-aw/actions/runs/37463239410
Manually invoke the agent

Debug this workflow failure using your favorite Agent CLI and the agentic-workflows prompt.

[!TIP]

Stop reporting this workflow as a failure

To stop a workflow from creating failure issues, set report-failure-as-issue: false in its frontmatter:

safe-outputs:
  report-failure-as-issue: false

Generated from Rust Code Quality Reviewer · 1.4K AIC · ◷

  • expires on Oct 13, 2026, 12:50 PM UTC
Lenguaje dominante
Rust
Estrellas
27
Forks
8
Merge medio
3 d 18 h
PR fusionados (30 d)
10

Preparar el entorno

  • Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
  • Tiene una plantilla de pull request
  • Sin guía de contribución

Primeros pasos

  1. Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
  2. Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
  3. Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
  4. Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.

Más de githubnext/ado-aw

Todos los issues de githubnext/ado-aw

Issues similares

Más issues de Rust

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.