Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Build analyzer

未关闭
#475 2 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
25/100
Issue 类型
功能
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
停滞
技术栈
cpp
领域
tooling

调研方向

先查看 issue 中链接的 analyzer interface specification 和 creating-from-scratch guide,然后检查其他 Exercism track 中的 analyzer。确定 C++ track 的 analyzer 范围,并按照规范实现它。当 analyzer 生成所需的 JSON 输出,且该 track 的 config.json 将 .status.analyzer 设置为 true 时,即表示完成。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

x:action/create x:knowledge/advanced x:module/analyzer x:size/massive x:type/coding

In Exercism v3, we are making increased use of our v2 analyzers. Analyzers automatically assess student's submissions and provide mentor-style commentary. They can be used to catch common mistakes and/or do complex solution analysis that can't easily be done directly in a test suite.

Each analyzer is track-specific. When a new solution is submitted, we run the track's analyzer, which outputs a JSON file that contains the analysis results.

In v2, analyzer comments were given to a mentor to pass to a student. In v3, the analyzers will normally output directly to students, although we have added an extra key to output suggestions to mentors. If your track already has an analyzer, the only requisite change is updating the outputted copy to be student-facing.

The analyzer is an optional tool though, which means that if a track does not have an analyzer, it will still function normally.

Goal

Build an analyzer for your track according to the spec. Check this page to help you get started with building an analyzer.

It can be very useful to check how other tracks have implemented their analyzer.

If your track already has a working analyzer, please close this issue and ensure that the .status.analyzer key in the track config.json file is set to true.

Choosing between representer and analyzer

There is some overlap between the goals of the representer and the analyzer. If you want to build both, we recommend starting by building the representer for the following reasons:

  • Representers are usually (far) easier to implement
  • Representers can have a far bigger impact on the mentoring load than analyzers by empowering mentors
  • Representers apply to all exercises, whereas analyzers usually target specific exercises or a subset

Tracking

https://github.com/exercism/v3-launch/issues/53

主要语言
C++
星标
291
派生
244
平均合并
17 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
1

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

exercism/cpp 的其他 Issue

查看 exercism/cpp 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 C++ Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。