Racket: Resyntax (the Racket static analyser/refactoring linter) runs in typed-racket and scribble CI; static-analysis SKIPs "not applicable to Racket"

未关闭
#278 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
3/5
预计耗时
半天
新手友好度
35/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
领域
tooling

调研方向

Start from the corpus audit entries in corpus/ (the expected results and corpus/projects.toml pins for the typed-racket and scribble checkouts) and find where the static-analysis check returns SKIP with "not applicable to Racket". The issue also cites the Racket profile docs, which claim no common linter exists. Done means the check reports on Racket repos that run Resyntax and the docs no longer contradict it, which may need a maintainer decision on the expected behaviour first.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Both repos run Resyntax on every pull request (and a scheduled autofixer); the Racket profile docs say "no linter the validator knows is in common use", but Resyntax is used by racket/racket, typed-racket, scribble and others.

Evidence from the corpus audit

racket/typed-racket, racket/scribble / static-analysis
  • kind: UNSUPPORTED
  • actual: SKIP: not applicable to Racket
  • expected: PASS: both repos run Resyntax, the Racket static analyser/refactoring linter, on every pull request (and a scheduled autofixer); the Racket profile docs say "no linter the validator knows is in common use", but Resyntax is used by racket/racket, typed-racket, scribble and rebellion's author (jackfirth/create-resyntax-pull-request).
  • evidence: racket__typed-racket/.github/workflows/resyntax-analyze.yml:49: run: xvfb-run racket -l- resyntax/cli analyze --local-git-repository . "origin/${GITHUB_BASE_REF}" --output-as-github-review --output-to-file ./resyntax-review.json; :38: packages: resyntax; racket__scribble/.github/workflows/resyntax-analyze.yml:49: same command; resyntax-autofixer.yml:33: uses: jackfirth/[email protected].
  • repro: a workflow step run: racket -l- resyntax/cli analyze --local-git-repository . origin/main.
  • confidence: medium

Found by the regression-corpus audit (235 real repositories, one or more per ecosystem profile; corpus and expected results in corpus/). Evidence is quoted from the audited checkouts at the commits pinned in corpus/projects.toml; <checkouts>/<owner>__<repo> is such a checkout.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01ByTXNqDWdM7HzezrFtEvQt

主要语言
Python
星标
4
派生
1
平均合并
10 小时 41 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
79

环境准备

这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南,环境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

cpp-best-practices/project_validator 的其他 Issue

查看 cpp-best-practices/project_validator 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。