[Testing] Match terminal checkpoint response semantics
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
调研方向
Start in checkpoint/core.py around lines 128-171, where the checkpoint token and operation delta are computed, then compare the two callers in executor.py (1020-1043) and checkpoint/processor.py (118-139). The SDK's tokenless-completion branch in state.py (1065-1075) shows the expected terminal behavior. Done means terminal SUCCEED and FAIL batches return no token and empty operations through both entry points, with tests for non-terminal batches unchanged.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Expected behavior
When an accepted checkpoint batch completes an execution, the emulator should return no checkpoint token and an empty Operations list. This should cover both execution success and execution failure.
This service behavior is documented in the PR #757 review discussion. The emulator findings below are confirmed by source inspection; no service response trace is included in this report.
Actual behavior
The shared checkpoint core can return a newly generated token and an unseen operation delta even when the accepted batch completes the execution. See checkpoint/core.py:128–171.
Both checkpoint entry points compute that result before applying completion or failure effects:
So terminal-response detection must account for the accepted batch, rather than rely only on execution status before those effects run.
The SDK distinguishes tokenless execution completion from token withdrawal in state.py:1065–1075. Ordinary terminal checkpoints against the emulator do not exercise the tokenless-completion branch.
Reproduction scenario
- Start an execution with a valid invocation and checkpoint token.
- Submit an accepted batch containing an
EXECUTIONupdate with actionSUCCEED. - Observe that the response still contains a checkpoint token.
- Repeat with
EXECUTION/FAIL. - Include unseen operation changes to demonstrate that the terminal response can also return a nonempty operations list.
This scenario follows from source inspection at revision 52b63b5f; it has not been executed for this report.
Acceptance criteria
- Cover terminal success and failure through both checkpoint entry points.
- Return no checkpoint token and empty operations for terminal batches.
- Cover terminal batches with otherwise-returnable operation changes.
- Preserve accepted updates and completion/failure effects, including the result or error.
- Add SDK/emulator integration coverage that verifies terminal completion rather than
PENDINGor unnecessary reinvocation. - Preserve existing behavior for non-terminal checkpoint batches.
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 58
- 派生
- 32
- 平均合并
- 1 天 6 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 80
环境准备
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
aws/aws-durable-execution-sdk-python 的其他 Issue
-
enhancement needs-triage
难度 1/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
aws/aws-durable-execution-sdk-python#927 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
enhancement
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
aws/aws-durable-execution-sdk-python#875 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
enhancement
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 85/100
aws/aws-durable-execution-sdk-python#794 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 58/100
aws/aws-durable-execution-sdk-python#921 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
[Bug]: JS examples CI still invokes Jest after Vitest migration可能已有人在做 关联的 PR 仍在进行中或已合并。 未关闭bug needs-triage
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 55/100
aws/aws-durable-execution-sdk-python#918 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
查看 aws/aws-durable-execution-sdk-python 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
physical
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 74/100
antonyrag/ragleap-core#1339 ·
-
enhancement good first issue
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 83/100
AllenCell/SubCellSeg#5 ·
-
[🐛 Bug]: oidc_authverifier.py strips trailing slash causing "Invalid token: Invalid issuer" error未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
keephq/keep#6934 · 1 个 reaction ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
bug game: 01008BA02525A000 ios
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
needs-triage
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 87/100
gke-labs/kube-agents#5501 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复