query-db-collection (on-demand): a second live query on an identical stale subset reuses the observer and never refetches
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 3/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-2 天
- 新手友好度
- 68/100
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- typescript
- 领域
- database
调研方向
Start in packages/query-db-collection/src/query and trace loadSubset when it reuses an observer for an existing hashedQueryKey. Add the provided failing test under packages/query-db-collection/tests/, then compare reuse behavior with Query Core’s refetchOnMount rules. Done when the test confirms stale subsets refetch for a second identical live query and the false, 'always', and staleTime: null cases behave as described.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
- I've validated the bug against the latest version of DB packages
Describe the bug
With syncMode: "on-demand" and staleTime: 0, a second live query with the same predicate as an already-loaded subset never refetches. It reuses the existing observer, so rows the server added after the first load never appear, in either live query.
When state.observers already has the subset's hashedQueryKey, loadSubset bumps the refcount and returns on the observer's current success result without consulting isStale. Exact-request reuse is intended (#1657 / #1797; #1935: "Live queries that ask for the same subset share its Query"). The gap is that refetchOnMount (#1665) is only forwarded when an observer is created. A reused observer never mounts, so staleTime / refetchOnMount are skipped for the second consumer. Focus and reconnect refetches still work, so this only shows up while navigating in-session. #998 covered the empty-result case; a populated stale subset still short-circuits.
Versions: @tanstack/[email protected], @tanstack/[email protected], @tanstack/[email protected]. Also reproduced on 0.15.2 / 1.4.8 and on 0.8.7 / 1.2.12.
To Reproduce
- Create an on-demand query collection with
staleTime: 0. - Mount live query A with
where customerId = 'u1'.queryFnruns and the subset loads. - The server gains a new matching row.
- Mount live query B with the identical predicate.
- See that
queryFndoes not run again and that neither A nor B contains the new row.
Failing test (vitest, for packages/query-db-collection/tests/):
import { describe, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest'
import { QueryClient } from '@tanstack/query-core'
import {
compileSingleRowExpression,
createCollection,
createLiveQueryCollection,
eq,
toBooleanPredicate,
} from '@tanstack/db'
import { queryCollectionOptions } from '../src/query'
type Row = { id: string; customerId: string }
const flush = async () => {
for (let i = 0; i < 15; i++) await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 0))
}
describe(`on-demand subset reuse`, () => {
it(`refetches a stale subset when a second live query acquires the same predicate`, async () => {
const queryClient = new QueryClient({
defaultOptions: { queries: { retry: false } },
})
const serverRows: Array<Row> = [{ id: `x1`, customerId: `u1` }]
const queryFn = vi.fn(async (ctx: any) => {
const where = ctx.meta?.loadSubsetOptions?.where
if (!where) return []
const predicate = compileSingleRowExpression(where)
return serverRows.filter((row) =>
toBooleanPredicate(predicate({ ...row })),
)
})
const collection = createCollection(
queryCollectionOptions<Row>({
id: `stale-subset-reuse`,
getKey: (row) => row.id,
queryKey: [`rows`],
queryClient,
syncMode: `on-demand`,
staleTime: 0,
queryFn,
}),
)
const window = () => {
const live = createLiveQueryCollection((q) =>
q.from({ row: collection }).where(({ row }) => eq(row.customerId, `u1`)),
)
live.subscribeChanges(() => {})
return live
}
const ids = (live: { values: () => Iterable<Row> }) =>
[...live.values()].map((row) => row.id).sort()
const a = window()
await flush()
expect(queryFn).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
expect(ids(a)).toEqual([`x1`])
serverRows.push({ id: `x2`, customerId: `u1` })
const b = window()
await flush()
// Fails: queryFn stays at 1 call and both windows stay at [`x1`].
expect(queryFn).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2)
expect(ids(a)).toEqual([`x1`, `x2`])
expect(ids(b)).toEqual([`x1`, `x2`])
})
})
Actual on 1.5.1: queryFn is called once, and both windows are ["x1"].
Expected behavior
Acquiring an existing subset applies the same freshness rule as mounting a new QueryObserver. It refetches when refetchOnMount allows it (true with a stale result, or 'always'), and does nothing for false or a fresh result. After step 4, queryFn has run twice and both live queries contain x1 and x2.
Additional context
Not platform-specific: it reproduces in plain Node with the test above. We hit it in a React Native app (Hermes), where two screens filter the same subset.
A local patch fixes it for us. When loadSubset reuses an existing observer, it evaluates the rule Query Core applies on mount: enabled, then refetchOnMount (a value or a function), against the current result's isStale / isFetching. If that calls for a refetch, it returns refetchAndWaitForApplication(observer, hashedQueryKey) and deduplicates concurrent acquisitions of the same key. With it, this test and the refetchOnMount: 'always' / false and staleTime: null variants behave as with a fresh observer. Happy to open a PR.
- 主要语言
- TypeScript
- 星标
- 4k
- 派生
- 277
- 平均合并
- 1 天 9 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 162
环境准备
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
TanStack/db 的其他 Issue
-
难度 1/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 88/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
OfflineExecutor.dispose() never settles pendingTransactionPromises可能重新可做 @Claire-ovo 于 10 天前认领,目前没有进行中的 PR。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Two @tanstack/db tests time out under CPU load because a cold module import counts against the 5 s default timeout可能已有人在做 @jp-knj 于 8 天前认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 4/5 3-5 天 新手友好度 48/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 83/100
appandflow/stim#5258 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
area/docs framework/hugo help wanted language/markdown
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 88/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
community first-timers-only good first issue hacktoberfest help wanted low hanging fruit up-for-grabs
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 68/100
lingdojo/kana-dojo#33660 · 1 条评论 · 5 个 reaction ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
drizzle-team/drizzle-orm#6639 ·
维护者通常 4 天内回复
-
enhancement
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 76/100