query-db-collection (on-demand): a second live query on an identical stale subset reuses the observer and never refetches
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
Evaluación
- Dificultad
- 3/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 1-2 días
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 68/100
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Claridad
- Bien especificado
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Stack tecnológico
- typescript
- Área
- database
Línea de trabajo
Start in packages/query-db-collection/src/query and trace loadSubset when it reuses an observer for an existing hashedQueryKey. Add the provided failing test under packages/query-db-collection/tests/, then compare reuse behavior with Query Core’s refetchOnMount rules. Done when the test confirms stale subsets refetch for a second identical live query and the false, 'always', and staleTime: null cases behave as described.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Descripción
- I've validated the bug against the latest version of DB packages
Describe the bug
With syncMode: "on-demand" and staleTime: 0, a second live query with the same predicate as an already-loaded subset never refetches. It reuses the existing observer, so rows the server added after the first load never appear, in either live query.
When state.observers already has the subset's hashedQueryKey, loadSubset bumps the refcount and returns on the observer's current success result without consulting isStale. Exact-request reuse is intended (#1657 / #1797; #1935: "Live queries that ask for the same subset share its Query"). The gap is that refetchOnMount (#1665) is only forwarded when an observer is created. A reused observer never mounts, so staleTime / refetchOnMount are skipped for the second consumer. Focus and reconnect refetches still work, so this only shows up while navigating in-session. #998 covered the empty-result case; a populated stale subset still short-circuits.
Versions: @tanstack/[email protected], @tanstack/[email protected], @tanstack/[email protected]. Also reproduced on 0.15.2 / 1.4.8 and on 0.8.7 / 1.2.12.
To Reproduce
- Create an on-demand query collection with
staleTime: 0. - Mount live query A with
where customerId = 'u1'.queryFnruns and the subset loads. - The server gains a new matching row.
- Mount live query B with the identical predicate.
- See that
queryFndoes not run again and that neither A nor B contains the new row.
Failing test (vitest, for packages/query-db-collection/tests/):
import { describe, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest'
import { QueryClient } from '@tanstack/query-core'
import {
compileSingleRowExpression,
createCollection,
createLiveQueryCollection,
eq,
toBooleanPredicate,
} from '@tanstack/db'
import { queryCollectionOptions } from '../src/query'
type Row = { id: string; customerId: string }
const flush = async () => {
for (let i = 0; i < 15; i++) await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 0))
}
describe(`on-demand subset reuse`, () => {
it(`refetches a stale subset when a second live query acquires the same predicate`, async () => {
const queryClient = new QueryClient({
defaultOptions: { queries: { retry: false } },
})
const serverRows: Array<Row> = [{ id: `x1`, customerId: `u1` }]
const queryFn = vi.fn(async (ctx: any) => {
const where = ctx.meta?.loadSubsetOptions?.where
if (!where) return []
const predicate = compileSingleRowExpression(where)
return serverRows.filter((row) =>
toBooleanPredicate(predicate({ ...row })),
)
})
const collection = createCollection(
queryCollectionOptions<Row>({
id: `stale-subset-reuse`,
getKey: (row) => row.id,
queryKey: [`rows`],
queryClient,
syncMode: `on-demand`,
staleTime: 0,
queryFn,
}),
)
const window = () => {
const live = createLiveQueryCollection((q) =>
q.from({ row: collection }).where(({ row }) => eq(row.customerId, `u1`)),
)
live.subscribeChanges(() => {})
return live
}
const ids = (live: { values: () => Iterable<Row> }) =>
[...live.values()].map((row) => row.id).sort()
const a = window()
await flush()
expect(queryFn).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
expect(ids(a)).toEqual([`x1`])
serverRows.push({ id: `x2`, customerId: `u1` })
const b = window()
await flush()
// Fails: queryFn stays at 1 call and both windows stay at [`x1`].
expect(queryFn).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2)
expect(ids(a)).toEqual([`x1`, `x2`])
expect(ids(b)).toEqual([`x1`, `x2`])
})
})
Actual on 1.5.1: queryFn is called once, and both windows are ["x1"].
Expected behavior
Acquiring an existing subset applies the same freshness rule as mounting a new QueryObserver. It refetches when refetchOnMount allows it (true with a stale result, or 'always'), and does nothing for false or a fresh result. After step 4, queryFn has run twice and both live queries contain x1 and x2.
Additional context
Not platform-specific: it reproduces in plain Node with the test above. We hit it in a React Native app (Hermes), where two screens filter the same subset.
A local patch fixes it for us. When loadSubset reuses an existing observer, it evaluates the rule Query Core applies on mount: enabled, then refetchOnMount (a value or a function), against the current result's isStale / isFetching. If that calls for a refetch, it returns refetchAndWaitForApplication(observer, hashedQueryKey) and deduplicates concurrent acquisitions of the same key. With it, this test and the refetchOnMount: 'always' / false and staleTime: null variants behave as with a fresh observer. Happy to open a PR.
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 4k
- Forks
- 277
- Merge medio
- 1 d 11 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 148
Preparar el entorno
- Sin Dockerfile ni archivo de Docker Compose
- Tiene una plantilla de pull request
- Leer la guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Más de TanStack/db
-
`Collection.currentStateAsChanges` JSDoc examples don’t match `CurrentStateAsChangesOptions`Abierto
Dificultad 1/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 88/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
OfflineExecutor.dispose() never settles pendingTransactionPromisesQuizá libre de nuevo @Claire-ovo la tomó hace 10 días y no hay ningún pull request abierto. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
TanStack/db#2254 · 1 comentario ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Two @tanstack/db tests time out under CPU load because a cold module import counts against the 5 s default timeoutPosiblemente ocupada @jp-knj la tomó hace 8 días. Abierto
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 82/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 4/5 3-5 días Aptitud para principiantes 48/100
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
Todos los issues de TanStack/db
Issues similares
-
area: web bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 76/100
kinqsradio/orbyn-engineering#227 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 85/100
joeldesante/TurfBuilder#258 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
bug
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
ncecere/open-mcp-portal#85 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 63/100
loathers/garbage-collector#2865 ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día
-
test-reliability
Dificultad 2/5 1-3 horas Aptitud para principiantes 78/100
Azure/azure-sdk-for-js#40672 · 1 reacción ·
Los mantenedores suelen responder en 1 día