query-db-collection (on-demand): a second live query on an identical stale subset reuses the observer and never refetches
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.
Avaliação
- Dificuldade
- 3/5
- Tempo estimado
- 1-2 dias
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 68/100
- Tipo de issue
- Bug
- Clareza
- Claramente especificada
- Status de atividade
- Ativa
- Stack de tecnologia
- typescript
- Domínio
- database
Direção de pesquisa
Start in packages/query-db-collection/src/query and trace loadSubset when it reuses an observer for an existing hashedQueryKey. Add the provided failing test under packages/query-db-collection/tests/, then compare reuse behavior with Query Core’s refetchOnMount rules. Done when the test confirms stale subsets refetch for a second identical live query and the false, 'always', and staleTime: null cases behave as described.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Descrição
- I've validated the bug against the latest version of DB packages
Describe the bug
With syncMode: "on-demand" and staleTime: 0, a second live query with the same predicate as an already-loaded subset never refetches. It reuses the existing observer, so rows the server added after the first load never appear, in either live query.
When state.observers already has the subset's hashedQueryKey, loadSubset bumps the refcount and returns on the observer's current success result without consulting isStale. Exact-request reuse is intended (#1657 / #1797; #1935: "Live queries that ask for the same subset share its Query"). The gap is that refetchOnMount (#1665) is only forwarded when an observer is created. A reused observer never mounts, so staleTime / refetchOnMount are skipped for the second consumer. Focus and reconnect refetches still work, so this only shows up while navigating in-session. #998 covered the empty-result case; a populated stale subset still short-circuits.
Versions: @tanstack/[email protected], @tanstack/[email protected], @tanstack/[email protected]. Also reproduced on 0.15.2 / 1.4.8 and on 0.8.7 / 1.2.12.
To Reproduce
- Create an on-demand query collection with
staleTime: 0. - Mount live query A with
where customerId = 'u1'.queryFnruns and the subset loads. - The server gains a new matching row.
- Mount live query B with the identical predicate.
- See that
queryFndoes not run again and that neither A nor B contains the new row.
Failing test (vitest, for packages/query-db-collection/tests/):
import { describe, expect, it, vi } from 'vitest'
import { QueryClient } from '@tanstack/query-core'
import {
compileSingleRowExpression,
createCollection,
createLiveQueryCollection,
eq,
toBooleanPredicate,
} from '@tanstack/db'
import { queryCollectionOptions } from '../src/query'
type Row = { id: string; customerId: string }
const flush = async () => {
for (let i = 0; i < 15; i++) await new Promise((r) => setTimeout(r, 0))
}
describe(`on-demand subset reuse`, () => {
it(`refetches a stale subset when a second live query acquires the same predicate`, async () => {
const queryClient = new QueryClient({
defaultOptions: { queries: { retry: false } },
})
const serverRows: Array<Row> = [{ id: `x1`, customerId: `u1` }]
const queryFn = vi.fn(async (ctx: any) => {
const where = ctx.meta?.loadSubsetOptions?.where
if (!where) return []
const predicate = compileSingleRowExpression(where)
return serverRows.filter((row) =>
toBooleanPredicate(predicate({ ...row })),
)
})
const collection = createCollection(
queryCollectionOptions<Row>({
id: `stale-subset-reuse`,
getKey: (row) => row.id,
queryKey: [`rows`],
queryClient,
syncMode: `on-demand`,
staleTime: 0,
queryFn,
}),
)
const window = () => {
const live = createLiveQueryCollection((q) =>
q.from({ row: collection }).where(({ row }) => eq(row.customerId, `u1`)),
)
live.subscribeChanges(() => {})
return live
}
const ids = (live: { values: () => Iterable<Row> }) =>
[...live.values()].map((row) => row.id).sort()
const a = window()
await flush()
expect(queryFn).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
expect(ids(a)).toEqual([`x1`])
serverRows.push({ id: `x2`, customerId: `u1` })
const b = window()
await flush()
// Fails: queryFn stays at 1 call and both windows stay at [`x1`].
expect(queryFn).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2)
expect(ids(a)).toEqual([`x1`, `x2`])
expect(ids(b)).toEqual([`x1`, `x2`])
})
})
Actual on 1.5.1: queryFn is called once, and both windows are ["x1"].
Expected behavior
Acquiring an existing subset applies the same freshness rule as mounting a new QueryObserver. It refetches when refetchOnMount allows it (true with a stale result, or 'always'), and does nothing for false or a fresh result. After step 4, queryFn has run twice and both live queries contain x1 and x2.
Additional context
Not platform-specific: it reproduces in plain Node with the test above. We hit it in a React Native app (Hermes), where two screens filter the same subset.
A local patch fixes it for us. When loadSubset reuses an existing observer, it evaluates the rule Query Core applies on mount: enabled, then refetchOnMount (a value or a function), against the current result's isStale / isFetching. If that calls for a refetch, it returns refetchAndWaitForApplication(observer, hashedQueryKey) and deduplicates concurrent acquisitions of the same key. With it, this test and the refetchOnMount: 'always' / false and staleTime: null variants behave as with a fresh observer. Happy to open a PR.
- Linguagem predominante
- TypeScript
- Estrelas
- 4k
- Forks
- 280
- Merge médio
- 1d 9h
- PRs com merge (30d)
- 139
Preparar o ambiente
- Sem Dockerfile nem arquivo Docker Compose
- Tem um modelo de pull request
- Ler o guia de contribuição
Primeiros passos
- Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
- Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
- Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
- Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.
Mais de TanStack/db
-
Dificuldade 1/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 88/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
OfflineExecutor.dispose() never settles pendingTransactionPromisesTalvez livre de novo @Claire-ovo assumiu há 12 dias e não há nenhum pull request aberto. Aberta
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 78/100
TanStack/db#2254 · 1 comentário ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 78/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Two @tanstack/db tests time out under CPU load because a cold module import counts against the 5 s default timeoutTalvez já em andamento @jp-knj assumiu há 10 dias. Aberta
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 82/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Dificuldade 4/5 3-5 dias Facilidade para iniciantes 48/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
Todas as issues de TanStack/db
Issues semelhantes
-
area:frontend kind:bug priority:p2 ready
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 82/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 82/100
handsontable/hyperformula#1879 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
enhancement
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 66/100
RunestoneInteractive/rs#1661 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 2 dias
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 78/100
capricorn86/happy-dom#2594 ·
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 68/100
Mantenedores costumam responder em até 1 dia