Source collection emptied when an ordered window that fell back to a full-source read is replaced by one reading the same subset
维护者通常 1 天内回复
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 新手友好度
- 48/100
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 技术栈
- typescript
- 领域
- database
调研方向
Start with repro.test.ts in the linked reproduction to see the failing subscribe and release sequence, then trace ordered-window fallback and source collection cleanup in the TanStack DB code. Reproduce with npm test; done means switching between overlapping full-source fallback windows keeps the 50-row window populated and the shared source rows intact, regardless of subscribe and release order.
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
- I've validated the bug against the latest version of DB packages
Describe the bug
One syncMode: "on-demand" query collection, one ordered, limited live query:
q.from({ r: source })
.where(({ r }) => not(eq(r.status, 4)))
.orderBy(({ r }) => r.date, { direction, nulls, stringSort: "lexical" })
.orderBy(({ r }) => r.id, direction)
.limit(50)
When the sort direction changes, the new live query is subscribed, then the old one is released (what a UI binding does when a reactive sort changes). If both windows fell back to a full-source read of the same filter, releasing the old window removes every row from the source collection. The new window stays at 0 rows and never recovers, nor does any other view on that collection.
Two triggers of the documented full-source fallback reproduce it:
- the first page ends on a NULL sort value (
DESC NULLS FIRSTon a nullable column); stringSort: "locale", without any NULL.
Indexes matching the query's compareOptions (no dev warning) don't change the result.
Requests seen by queryFn in the failing case:
DESC limit=50 -> 50 rows
DESC limit=none -> 240 rows (full-source fallback, where: status != 4)
ASC limit=50 -> 50 rows
ASC limit=none -> 240 rows (same subset as above)
-- old DESC window released --
source.size === 0, asc.size === 0
Controls that work:
- No NULL dates: the DESC window only requests its boundary tie (
date = …), so the ASC full read is a different subset. The source keeps 240 rows. - Same NULL data, but the old window is released before the new one subscribes: the source keeps its rows and the ASC window shows 50.
- Two unordered live queries with the same
where, overlapping the same way, keep their rows. So it seems specific to subsets acquired by the ordered loader's full-source fallback.
To Reproduce
Repo: https://github.com/1bod/tanstack-db-ordered-window-empties-source
StackBlitz: https://stackblitz.com/github/1bod/tanstack-db-ordered-window-empties-source
npm installnpm test- See the 2 control tests pass and the 3
BUGtests fail withexpected +0 to be 50(window) andexpected 0 to be greater than 0(source collection size).
repro.test.ts only uses @tanstack/db, @tanstack/query-db-collection and @tanstack/query-core, with a fake backend that honours where (including cursor predicates), orderBy with NULLS FIRST/LAST, offset and limit.
Expected behavior
After the switch, the ASC window shows its 50 rows and the source collection keeps the rows the new window holds, whatever the order of subscribe and release.
Screenshots
N/A
Desktop (please complete the following information):
- OS: Linux
- Browser: N/A (Node 26.13, vitest 4.1.12). First seen in a browser with
@tanstack/vue-db(useLiveQuery/useLiveInfiniteQuery) when toggling the sort of a list sorted by a nullable date. - Version:
@tanstack/db1.0.0-rc.1.3,@tanstack/query-db-collection1.5.1,@tanstack/query-core5.105.3
Smartphone (please complete the following information):
N/A
Additional context
Workaround: split the query into an isNull(date) window and a not(isNull(date)) window with stringSort: "lexical", so no page ends on NULL and the fallback never runs.
Possibly related: #2160 (rows lost across reentrant final-owner cleanup), #2352 (identical subset reuse), #2268 (full-source fallback on NULL page ends).
- 主要语言
- TypeScript
- 星标
- 4k
- 派生
- 277
- 平均合并
- 1 天 9 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 162
环境准备
- 没有 Dockerfile 或 Docker Compose 文件
- 有 Pull Request 模板
- 阅读贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
TanStack/db 的其他 Issue
-
难度 1/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 88/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
OfflineExecutor.dispose() never settles pendingTransactionPromises可能重新可做 @Claire-ovo 于 10 天前认领,目前没有进行中的 PR。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Two @tanstack/db tests time out under CPU load because a cold module import counts against the 5 s default timeout可能已有人在做 @jp-knj 于 8 天前认领。 未关闭
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 82/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 3/5 1-2 天 新手友好度 68/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
相似的 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 73/100
hugomrdias/playwright-test#753 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
Review view: Daily/Weekly Review header buttons use the app-wide toolbar control style可能已有人在做 @colherdesopa 今天认领。 未关闭
难度 1/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 90/100
dongdongbh/Mindwtr#1515 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
pending-triage
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
kirodotdev/Kiro#12301 ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 83/100