Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Better "expected results" in ADA

未关闭
#668 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 1 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

这个 Issue 还没有评估数据。

描述

A common failure in ADA is the result of poor result formatting. In my experience we can significantly improve on this by having the generation use a regular expression for validation rather than the similarity. This is because the system will often use truncated results (which is good from a readability perspective). For example:

{
    "agentPoolProfiles": [
        {
            "name": "nodepool1",
            "count": 1,
            "vmSize": "Standard_DS2_v2",
            "maxPods": 110,
            "osType": "Linux"
        }
    ],
    "dnsPrefix": "AKSClusterxxx-dns",
    "provisioningState": "Succeeded",
    "resourceGroup": "AKSLabResourceGroupxxx",
    "name": "AKSClusterxxx",
    "type": "Microsoft.ContainerService/ManagedClusters",
    ...
} 

However, this is not valid JSON and thus the validation step fails.

In this case, and in many like it, what we are actually looking for is "provisioningState": "Succeeded". Therefore for responses like this one we can use:

<!-- expected_similarity=.*Succeeded -->

On a similar note, it seems the tool gives a default similarity value of 0.3 which, for the most part, is too low to be reliable.

主要语言
Python
星标
13
派生
26
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

贡献指南

这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

MicrosoftDocs/executable-docs 的其他 Issue

查看 MicrosoftDocs/executable-docs 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。