Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

Reaction studies: smoke test, clearer names, and what replaces DirDyVTST (2008)

未关闭
#330 3 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
一周以上
新手友好度
15/100
Issue 类型
重构
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
c
领域
desktop

调研方向

Start with the GUI suite, which only checks that the Gas Phase and Condensed Phase study editors open, and with the DirDyVTST, Polyrate and MetaDyn task editors the issue names. Create each study, open every task editor, generate the input, and run a small case only where a code is installed. Done means both study types run end to end, and the DirDyVTST keep/rebuild/hide decision is recorded on the issue (see #221 and #62).

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

The two reaction study types have not been run end to end in this fork; the GUI suite only checks that their editors open.

  • Gas Phase Reaction Study: reactants, products and transition state, DirDyVTST (dirdyed) with NWChem, and the Polyrate editor for rate constants.
  • Condensed Phase Reaction Study: one Solvate task (Solvation Editor), then chained Metadynamics tasks (the MetaDyn registration: NWChem plane-wave PSPW, Car-Parrinello only).

Status of the external programs

  • DirDyVTST: last version 2008, and it is listed among the programs no longer distributed from the University of Minnesota.
  • Polyrate 17-C (2018, manual 2022): Apache 2.0. It reaches electronic-structure codes through interface programs (Gaussrate, Nwchemrate, ...). There is none for ORCA, and interfaces from before 2016 do not work with it.
  • Pilgrim 2.0 (2020): MIT, Python, the same group. It does VTST with SCT tunnelling, multi-structural VTST, dual-level ISPE and kinetic Monte Carlo. Which codes it reads still has to be checked.

To do

  1. Smoke test of both study types: create the study, open each task's editor, generate the input, and run a small case where a code is available.
  2. Names that say what is computed, e.g. "Reaction Rates (VTST)" and "Reaction in Solution (Metadynamics)".
  3. Decide between keeping DirDyVTST, rebuilding the study on Pilgrim or on Polyrate with Gaussrate (ORCA/Gaussian instead of NWChem), or hiding it. The condensed phase study could take CP2K AIMD/metadynamics as a second code (#329).

Related: #221 (DirDyVTST editor redesign), #62 (DirDyGauss).

主要语言
C
星标
10
派生
8
平均合并
21 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
1

环境准备

这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南,环境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

FriendsofECCE/ECCE 的其他 Issue

查看 FriendsofECCE/ECCE 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 C Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。