Hacktoberfest 2026:維護者為十月標記出來的 issue,仍然開放、適合新手。 瀏覽 Hacktoberfest issue

Reaction studies: smoke test, clearer names, and what replaces DirDyVTST (2008)

未關閉
#330 3 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

評估

難度
4/5
預估耗時
一週以上
新手友好度
15/100
Issue 類型
重構
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活躍度
活躍
技術堆疊
c
領域
desktop

研究方向

Start with the GUI suite, which only checks that the Gas Phase and Condensed Phase study editors open, and with the DirDyVTST, Polyrate and MetaDyn task editors the issue names. Create each study, open every task editor, generate the input, and run a small case only where a code is installed. Done means both study types run end to end, and the DirDyVTST keep/rebuild/hide decision is recorded on the issue (see #221 and #62).

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

描述

The two reaction study types have not been run end to end in this fork; the GUI suite only checks that their editors open.

  • Gas Phase Reaction Study: reactants, products and transition state, DirDyVTST (dirdyed) with NWChem, and the Polyrate editor for rate constants.
  • Condensed Phase Reaction Study: one Solvate task (Solvation Editor), then chained Metadynamics tasks (the MetaDyn registration: NWChem plane-wave PSPW, Car-Parrinello only).

Status of the external programs

  • DirDyVTST: last version 2008, and it is listed among the programs no longer distributed from the University of Minnesota.
  • Polyrate 17-C (2018, manual 2022): Apache 2.0. It reaches electronic-structure codes through interface programs (Gaussrate, Nwchemrate, ...). There is none for ORCA, and interfaces from before 2016 do not work with it.
  • Pilgrim 2.0 (2020): MIT, Python, the same group. It does VTST with SCT tunnelling, multi-structural VTST, dual-level ISPE and kinetic Monte Carlo. Which codes it reads still has to be checked.

To do

  1. Smoke test of both study types: create the study, open each task's editor, generate the input, and run a small case where a code is available.
  2. Names that say what is computed, e.g. "Reaction Rates (VTST)" and "Reaction in Solution (Metadynamics)".
  3. Decide between keeping DirDyVTST, rebuilding the study on Pilgrim or on Polyrate with Gaussrate (ORCA/Gaussian instead of NWChem), or hiding it. The condensed phase study could take CP2K AIMD/metadynamics as a second code (#329).

Related: #221 (DirDyVTST editor redesign), #62 (DirDyGauss).

主要語言
C
星號
10
分支
8
平均合併
21 分鐘
30 天內合併 PR
1

環境準備

這個專案沒有提供開發容器、Dockerfile 或貢獻指南,環境需要你自己搭建:先看它的 README,通用步驟見我們的新手貢獻指南。

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

FriendsofECCE/ECCE 的其他 Issue

查看 FriendsofECCE/ECCE 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 C Issue

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。