Hacktoberfest 2026:维护者为十月标记出来的 issue,仍然开放、适合新手。 浏览 Hacktoberfest issue

make_cat: spread-model size check can never fire; SM_DO_CLASSIFICATION silently ignored without its input

未关闭
#910 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

维护者通常 1 天内回复

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

评估

难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
新手友好度
55/100
Issue 类型
缺陷
描述清晰度
基本清楚
活跃度
活跃
技术栈
python

调研方向

Locate make_cat_runner and save_sm_data in the catalogue-assembly path, then trace the star/galaxy spread-model branch and its three-input path. Verify the size check, w_log call, SPREAD_MODEL output, SM_DO_CLASSIFICATION handling, and missing-threshold error behavior; done means each reported case behaves explicitly and is covered by focused tests.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

描述

Found while writing the classification-deferred-downstream contract for the decision record (#875). In the star/galaxy (spread-model) path of catalogue assembly: save_sm_data returns the n_obj argument it was given, so make_cat_runner's SExtractor-vs-spread-model size check compares a value with itself and can never fire — and if it did, it would crash, since it calls w_log(...) as a function; with three inputs (no spread-model catalogue) the runner writes no SPREAD_MODEL column while logging "setting spread model to 99", and SM_DO_CLASSIFICATION = True is silently ignored; a missing SM_STAR_THRESH/SM_GAL_THRESH surfaces as a bare NoOptionError. The path is dormant in the committed workflow (classification off), so nothing measured is affected today.

主要语言
Python
星标
18
派生
14
平均合并
1 天 4 小时
30 天内合并 PR
18

环境准备

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

CosmoStat/shapepipe 的其他 Issue

查看 CosmoStat/shapepipe 的全部 Issue

相似的 Issue

更多 Python Issue

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。