Rephrase questions+answers to use the Kesselman list of estimative words
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
评估
- 难度
- 3/5
- 预计耗时
- 1-2 天
- 新手友好度
- 55/100
- Issue 类型
- 重构
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 技术栈
- html, javascript
- 领域
- content, documentation
调研方向
检查 repository 的 HTML/JavaScript 文件中的测验问题，以了解当前的措辞。该 issue 建议根据 Kesselman 估计词，将陈述改写为可能性问题。确定问题的定义位置，并修改它们以使用新格式，必要时拆分复杂问题。测试更新后的测验，以确保其正常运行并显示新的措辞。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
描述
Humans actually SUCK at deciding what they agree with (even when the claim they do), agreement seems like just a function derived from intuitive likelihood/probability assessments.
We actually lack anything numerical which has a relationship to real-life processes which maps to "agreement phrases", but we do have something like that for likelihood/probability:
http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/wp-content/uploads/v32n5p167-168.pdf
https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/55739/kesselman_thesis_final.pdf
(Note however that actually, Kesselman didn't exactly distinguish between likelihood and probability, although one definitely should:
However, that seems not so bad.)
As an example, a statement like:
"Oppression by corporations is more of a concern than oppression by governments."
Becomes, for example:
"How likely does it seem that oppression by corporations posses more of a concern than oppression by governments?"
Note: Rephrasing the question like that seems to immediately reveal various problems with the original question! So, It'd probably end up better to split up the question into many more, for example:
"How likely does oppression by corporations seem?"
"How likely does oppression by governments seem?"
"How likely would oppression by corporations affect you?"
"How likely would oppression by government affect you?"
Bonus: If you do it that way, you unmask the link between socio-economic status and political orientation...
- 主要语言
- HTML
- 星标
- 1.1k
- 派生
- 452
- PR 合并指标
- 30 天内没有已合并 PR
环境准备
这个项目没有提供开发容器、Dockerfile 或贡献指南，环境需要你自己搭建：先看它的 README，通用步骤见我们的新手贡献指南。
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue，再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库，在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request，并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
8values/8values.github.io 的其他 Issue
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 75/100
8values/8values.github.io#184 ·
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 70/100
8values/8values.github.io#183 · 8 个 reaction ·
-
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 70/100
8values/8values.github.io#179 · 2 条评论 · 4 个 reaction ·
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 80/100
8values/8values.github.io#152 ·
-
Libertarian Socialist should be Democratic Socialist in many cases可能重新可做 关联的 PR 已关闭且未合并。 未关闭calibration
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 65/100
8values/8values.github.io#150 · 3 条评论 ·
查看 8values/8values.github.io 的全部 Issue
相似的 Issue
-
approved check:passed streams:add
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 75/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 75/100
slavakurilyak/awesome-ai-agents#742 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
feedback simulation workshop
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 78/100
githubnext/gh-aw-workshop#4456 ·
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
sync-en
难度 2/5 1-3 小时 新手友好度 72/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复
-
[辞書] 誕おめ未关闭要トリアージ 辞書
难度 1/5 1 小时以内 新手友好度 85/100
维护者通常 1 天内回复