BIOS: panic on unknown E820 region type violates ACPI §15 (Table 15-374)
Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.
Avaliação
- Dificuldade
- 3/5
- Tempo estimado
- 1-2 dias
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 67/100
- Tipo de issue
- Bug
- Clareza
- Razoavelmente clara
- Status de atividade
- Ativa
- Stack de tecnologia
- rust
- Domínio
- operating-systems
Direção de pesquisa
Comece em src/bootinfo/memory_map.rs, na implementação de From, e leia como MemoryRegionType atravessa a fronteira entre bootloader e kernel. Verifique se um tipo E820 não reconhecido não causa mais um panic, é representado como Reserved e mantém a ABI 0.9 inalterada; o problema separado de upstream relacionado à leitura do mapa está explicitamente fora do escopo.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Descrição
Hi — reporting a panic hit on real hardware during a BIOS/CSM boot, with a proposed three-line fix. Happy to open a PR against v0.9-base if you agree with the approach.
Symptom
ASUS ROG AMD board, 32 GiB RAM, AMI BIOS 2.20.1271, booting legacy/CSM from a USB stick. The bootloader runs, reaches the memory map parsing, and stops:
panicked at src/bootinfo/memory_map.rs:225:18:
invalid region type 2954887168
The kernel never starts. Nothing indicates which region is at fault, nor how many there are.
What the specification requires
INT 15h AX=E820h is specified by the ACPI Specification, §15 — System Address Map Interfaces. Table 15-374 (Address Range Types) explicitly covers types the OS does not know:
Ranges marked "Reserved for future use" must be treated by OSPM as if the type returned was
AddressRangeReserved.
So the specification anticipates unknown types, and mandates reserving them rather than failing. The current behaviour is non-conformant: a bootloader refuses to start on firmware that is within spec.
This is not hypothetical — Linux dealt with the same issue ("e820: Undefined type not treated as AddressRangeReserved"), some firmware emitting type 13 where SeaBIOS emits 2.
What 0.11 already does
The next major version handles this well:
// bootloader-x86_64-bios-stage-4/src/memory_descriptor.rs
fn kind(&self) -> MemoryRegionKind {
match self.0.region_type {
1 => MemoryRegionKind::Usable,
other => MemoryRegionKind::UnknownBios(other),
}
}
Neither panic nor silence: the region is not reusable, and the raw value is preserved. The proposal below carries that spirit into the constraints of 0.9.
Proposed fix
src/bootinfo/memory_map.rs, around line 219:
impl From<E820MemoryRegion> for MemoryRegion {
fn from(region: E820MemoryRegion) -> MemoryRegion {
let region_type = match region.region_type {
1 => MemoryRegionType::Usable,
2 => MemoryRegionType::Reserved,
3 => MemoryRegionType::AcpiReclaimable,
4 => MemoryRegionType::AcpiNvs,
5 => MemoryRegionType::BadMemory,
- t => panic!("invalid region type {}", t),
+ // ACPI Specification §15, Table 15-374 (Address Range Types): ranges marked
+ // "Reserved for future use" must be treated by OSPM as if the type returned
+ // was AddressRangeReserved. Treating them as fatal makes the bootloader
+ // refuse to start on firmware that is within spec.
+ //
+ // Not reusing the region is both the safe and the conformant behaviour;
+ // `Reserved` expresses exactly that.
+ _ => MemoryRegionType::Reserved,
};
Why Reserved rather than a variant carrying the value, as 0.11 does with UnknownBios(u32): MemoryRegionType is #[repr(C)] and crosses the boundary between bootloader and kernel, which are compiled separately. Adding a payload-carrying variant would change its representation and break the ABI for every existing kernel. On a maintenance branch that seems out of the question.
If you would rather preserve the value anyway, two options exist — a payload-free variant plus a separate field in MemoryRegion, or a counter exposed through BootInfo — but both touch the ABI and are your call, not mine.
What this fix does not address
In our case the value received is 2954887168 = 0xB0200000. That is not a region type, however exotic: the specification defines only a handful. It is an address. So there is additionally something wrong with how the map is read upstream of this code — entry size, entry count, or buffer overrun — which I have not characterised yet.
The proposed change does not fix that. It keeps the bootloader usable on conformant hardware, and turns a fatal stop into a merely unused region, which is what the specification asks for. I will keep investigating the root cause and report back.
Reproduction
bootloader = "0.9.34", custom x86_64 target, image produced bycargo bootimage- written with
ddto a USB stick (SanDisk0781:5590), 3,091,968 bytes, checksum verified - ASUS ROG AMD board, AMI BIOS 2.20.1271, legacy/CSM boot
- the same binary runs fine under QEMU: the fault only shows on this real firmware, which is consistent with an E820 map that differs from SeaBIOS's
- Linguagem predominante
- Rust
- Estrelas
- 1.7k
- Forks
- 240
- Métricas de merge de PRs
- Nenhum PR com merge em 30d
Guia de contribuição
Nenhum guia de contribuição indexado para este repositório
Primeiros passos
- Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
- Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
- Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
- Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.
Mais de rust-osdev/bootloader
-
No boot on real hardware Aberta
Dificuldade 4/5 3-5 dias Facilidade para iniciantes 35/100
rust-osdev/bootloader#573 · 5 comentários ·
-
Dificuldade 5/5 Mais de uma semana Facilidade para iniciantes 20/100
rust-osdev/bootloader#555 · 2 comentários ·
-
Dificuldade 5/5 Mais de uma semana Facilidade para iniciantes 30/100
rust-osdev/bootloader#534 ·
-
Dificuldade 3/5 1-2 dias Facilidade para iniciantes 38/100
rust-osdev/bootloader#525 ·
-
Dificuldade 4/5 3-5 dias Facilidade para iniciantes 45/100
rust-osdev/bootloader#514 · 3 comentários ·
Todas as issues de rust-osdev/bootloader
Issues semelhantes
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 78/100
BurntSushi/jiff#653 ·
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 72/100
ZcashFoundation/zeeder#106 ·
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 76/100
oxidize-rb/rb-sys#807 ·
-
Dificuldade 2/5 1-3 horas Facilidade para iniciantes 88/100
-
todo:ticket
Dificuldade 2/5 1-2 dias Facilidade para iniciantes 74/100