BIOS: panic on unknown E820 region type violates ACPI §15 (Table 15-374)
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 3/5
- Tempo stimato
- 1-2 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 67/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- rust
- Ambito
- operating-systems
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia in src/bootinfo/memory_map.rs, nell’implementazione di From, e verifica come MemoryRegionType attraversa il confine tra bootloader e kernel. Verifica che un tipo E820 non riconosciuto non provochi più un panic, sia rappresentato come Reserved e lasci invariata l’ABI 0.9; il problema separato di upstream relativo alla lettura della map è esplicitamente fuori ambito.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Hi — reporting a panic hit on real hardware during a BIOS/CSM boot, with a proposed three-line fix. Happy to open a PR against v0.9-base if you agree with the approach.
Symptom
ASUS ROG AMD board, 32 GiB RAM, AMI BIOS 2.20.1271, booting legacy/CSM from a USB stick. The bootloader runs, reaches the memory map parsing, and stops:
panicked at src/bootinfo/memory_map.rs:225:18:
invalid region type 2954887168
The kernel never starts. Nothing indicates which region is at fault, nor how many there are.
What the specification requires
INT 15h AX=E820h is specified by the ACPI Specification, §15 — System Address Map Interfaces. Table 15-374 (Address Range Types) explicitly covers types the OS does not know:
Ranges marked "Reserved for future use" must be treated by OSPM as if the type returned was
AddressRangeReserved.
So the specification anticipates unknown types, and mandates reserving them rather than failing. The current behaviour is non-conformant: a bootloader refuses to start on firmware that is within spec.
This is not hypothetical — Linux dealt with the same issue ("e820: Undefined type not treated as AddressRangeReserved"), some firmware emitting type 13 where SeaBIOS emits 2.
What 0.11 already does
The next major version handles this well:
// bootloader-x86_64-bios-stage-4/src/memory_descriptor.rs
fn kind(&self) -> MemoryRegionKind {
match self.0.region_type {
1 => MemoryRegionKind::Usable,
other => MemoryRegionKind::UnknownBios(other),
}
}
Neither panic nor silence: the region is not reusable, and the raw value is preserved. The proposal below carries that spirit into the constraints of 0.9.
Proposed fix
src/bootinfo/memory_map.rs, around line 219:
impl From<E820MemoryRegion> for MemoryRegion {
fn from(region: E820MemoryRegion) -> MemoryRegion {
let region_type = match region.region_type {
1 => MemoryRegionType::Usable,
2 => MemoryRegionType::Reserved,
3 => MemoryRegionType::AcpiReclaimable,
4 => MemoryRegionType::AcpiNvs,
5 => MemoryRegionType::BadMemory,
- t => panic!("invalid region type {}", t),
+ // ACPI Specification §15, Table 15-374 (Address Range Types): ranges marked
+ // "Reserved for future use" must be treated by OSPM as if the type returned
+ // was AddressRangeReserved. Treating them as fatal makes the bootloader
+ // refuse to start on firmware that is within spec.
+ //
+ // Not reusing the region is both the safe and the conformant behaviour;
+ // `Reserved` expresses exactly that.
+ _ => MemoryRegionType::Reserved,
};
Why Reserved rather than a variant carrying the value, as 0.11 does with UnknownBios(u32): MemoryRegionType is #[repr(C)] and crosses the boundary between bootloader and kernel, which are compiled separately. Adding a payload-carrying variant would change its representation and break the ABI for every existing kernel. On a maintenance branch that seems out of the question.
If you would rather preserve the value anyway, two options exist — a payload-free variant plus a separate field in MemoryRegion, or a counter exposed through BootInfo — but both touch the ABI and are your call, not mine.
What this fix does not address
In our case the value received is 2954887168 = 0xB0200000. That is not a region type, however exotic: the specification defines only a handful. It is an address. So there is additionally something wrong with how the map is read upstream of this code — entry size, entry count, or buffer overrun — which I have not characterised yet.
The proposed change does not fix that. It keeps the bootloader usable on conformant hardware, and turns a fatal stop into a merely unused region, which is what the specification asks for. I will keep investigating the root cause and report back.
Reproduction
bootloader = "0.9.34", custom x86_64 target, image produced bycargo bootimage- written with
ddto a USB stick (SanDisk0781:5590), 3,091,968 bytes, checksum verified - ASUS ROG AMD board, AMI BIOS 2.20.1271, legacy/CSM boot
- the same binary runs fine under QEMU: the fault only shows on this real firmware, which is consistent with an E820 map that differs from SeaBIOS's
- Lingua principale
- Rust
- Stelle
- 1.7k
- Fork
- 240
- Metriche di merge delle PR
- Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g
Guida per i contributori
Nessuna guida per i contributori indicizzata per questo repository
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di rust-osdev/bootloader
-
No boot on real hardware Aperta
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 35/100
rust-osdev/bootloader#573 · 5 commenti ·
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 20/100
rust-osdev/bootloader#555 · 2 commenti ·
-
Difficoltà 5/5 Più di una settimana Idoneità per principianti 30/100
rust-osdev/bootloader#534 ·
-
Difficoltà 3/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 38/100
rust-osdev/bootloader#525 ·
-
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 45/100
rust-osdev/bootloader#514 · 3 commenti ·
Tutte le issue di rust-osdev/bootloader
Issue simili
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 76/100
-
bug good first issue package: quic
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 78/100
-
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 78/100
-
`dora trace view` sends a non-canonical full UUID as-is, so a valid trace ID shows "No spans found" Apertacli coordinator rust
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
-
area: tasks enhancement good first issue help wanted
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 88/100
Jason-jo17/Polybench#15 · 1 commento ·