BIOS: panic on unknown E820 region type violates ACPI §15 (Table 15-374)
まだ誰も着手していません。
評価
- 難易度
- 3/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1〜2日
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 67/100
- issue の種類
- バグ
- 明瞭さ
- おおむね明確
- 活発さ
- 活発
- 技術スタック
- rust
調査の方向性
src/bootinfo/memory_map.rs の From 実装から始め、MemoryRegionType が bootloader/kernel 境界をどのように越えるかを読み取ります。認識されない E820 型で panic が発生しなくなり、Reserved として表現され、0.9 ABI が変更されていないことを確認してください。別個の upstream の map 読み取り問題は明示的にスコープ外です。
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
説明
Hi — reporting a panic hit on real hardware during a BIOS/CSM boot, with a proposed three-line fix. Happy to open a PR against v0.9-base if you agree with the approach.
Symptom
ASUS ROG AMD board, 32 GiB RAM, AMI BIOS 2.20.1271, booting legacy/CSM from a USB stick. The bootloader runs, reaches the memory map parsing, and stops:
panicked at src/bootinfo/memory_map.rs:225:18:
invalid region type 2954887168
The kernel never starts. Nothing indicates which region is at fault, nor how many there are.
What the specification requires
INT 15h AX=E820h is specified by the ACPI Specification, §15 — System Address Map Interfaces. Table 15-374 (Address Range Types) explicitly covers types the OS does not know:
Ranges marked "Reserved for future use" must be treated by OSPM as if the type returned was
AddressRangeReserved.
So the specification anticipates unknown types, and mandates reserving them rather than failing. The current behaviour is non-conformant: a bootloader refuses to start on firmware that is within spec.
This is not hypothetical — Linux dealt with the same issue ("e820: Undefined type not treated as AddressRangeReserved"), some firmware emitting type 13 where SeaBIOS emits 2.
What 0.11 already does
The next major version handles this well:
// bootloader-x86_64-bios-stage-4/src/memory_descriptor.rs
fn kind(&self) -> MemoryRegionKind {
match self.0.region_type {
1 => MemoryRegionKind::Usable,
other => MemoryRegionKind::UnknownBios(other),
}
}
Neither panic nor silence: the region is not reusable, and the raw value is preserved. The proposal below carries that spirit into the constraints of 0.9.
Proposed fix
src/bootinfo/memory_map.rs, around line 219:
impl From<E820MemoryRegion> for MemoryRegion {
fn from(region: E820MemoryRegion) -> MemoryRegion {
let region_type = match region.region_type {
1 => MemoryRegionType::Usable,
2 => MemoryRegionType::Reserved,
3 => MemoryRegionType::AcpiReclaimable,
4 => MemoryRegionType::AcpiNvs,
5 => MemoryRegionType::BadMemory,
- t => panic!("invalid region type {}", t),
+ // ACPI Specification §15, Table 15-374 (Address Range Types): ranges marked
+ // "Reserved for future use" must be treated by OSPM as if the type returned
+ // was AddressRangeReserved. Treating them as fatal makes the bootloader
+ // refuse to start on firmware that is within spec.
+ //
+ // Not reusing the region is both the safe and the conformant behaviour;
+ // `Reserved` expresses exactly that.
+ _ => MemoryRegionType::Reserved,
};
Why Reserved rather than a variant carrying the value, as 0.11 does with UnknownBios(u32): MemoryRegionType is #[repr(C)] and crosses the boundary between bootloader and kernel, which are compiled separately. Adding a payload-carrying variant would change its representation and break the ABI for every existing kernel. On a maintenance branch that seems out of the question.
If you would rather preserve the value anyway, two options exist — a payload-free variant plus a separate field in MemoryRegion, or a counter exposed through BootInfo — but both touch the ABI and are your call, not mine.
What this fix does not address
In our case the value received is 2954887168 = 0xB0200000. That is not a region type, however exotic: the specification defines only a handful. It is an address. So there is additionally something wrong with how the map is read upstream of this code — entry size, entry count, or buffer overrun — which I have not characterised yet.
The proposed change does not fix that. It keeps the bootloader usable on conformant hardware, and turns a fatal stop into a merely unused region, which is what the specification asks for. I will keep investigating the root cause and report back.
Reproduction
bootloader = "0.9.34", custom x86_64 target, image produced bycargo bootimage- written with
ddto a USB stick (SanDisk0781:5590), 3,091,968 bytes, checksum verified - ASUS ROG AMD board, AMI BIOS 2.20.1271, legacy/CSM boot
- the same binary runs fine under QEMU: the fault only shows on this real firmware, which is consistent with an E820 map that differs from SeaBIOS's
- 主要言語
- Rust
- スター
- 1.7k
- フォーク
- 240
- PR マージ指標
- 30日以内にマージされた PR はありません
環境構築
このプロジェクトの環境構築ファイルはまだ確認していません。まず README を読み、一般的な手順ははじめてのコントリビューションガイドを参照してください。
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
rust-osdev/bootloader のほかの issue
-
難易度 4/5 3〜5日 初心者へのやさしさ 35/100
rust-osdev/bootloader#573 · コメント 5 件 ·
-
難易度 5/5 1週間以上 初心者へのやさしさ 20/100
rust-osdev/bootloader#555 · コメント 2 件 ·
-
難易度 5/5 1週間以上 初心者へのやさしさ 30/100
rust-osdev/bootloader#534 ·
-
難易度 3/5 1〜2日 初心者へのやさしさ 38/100
rust-osdev/bootloader#525 ·
-
難易度 4/5 3〜5日 初心者へのやさしさ 45/100
rust-osdev/bootloader#514 · コメント 3 件 ·
rust-osdev/bootloader の issue をすべて見る
似ている issue
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 72/100
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
難易度 1/5 1時間未満 初心者へのやさしさ 92/100
bytecodealliance/wasmtime#14433 ·
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 68/100
-
bug
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 76/100
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 88/100
メンテナーはふだん 1 日以内に返信