Hacktoberfest 2026:メンテナが10月に向けて印を付けた、オープンで初心者向けの issue。 Hacktoberfest の issue を見る

BIOS: panic on unknown E820 region type violates ACPI §15 (Table 15-374)

オープン
#581 コメント 2 件 リアクション 0 件 担当者 0 名 GitHub で見る

まだ誰も着手していません。

評価

難易度
3/5
見積もり時間
1〜2日
初心者へのやさしさ
67/100
issue の種類
バグ
明瞭さ
おおむね明確
活発さ
活発
技術スタック
rust

調査の方向性

src/bootinfo/memory_map.rs の From 実装から始め、MemoryRegionType が bootloader/kernel 境界をどのように越えるかを読み取ります。認識されない E820 型で panic が発生しなくなり、Reserved として表現され、0.9 ABI が変更されていないことを確認してください。別個の upstream の map 読み取り問題は明示的にスコープ外です。

索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。

説明

help wanted

Hi — reporting a panic hit on real hardware during a BIOS/CSM boot, with a proposed three-line fix. Happy to open a PR against v0.9-base if you agree with the approach.

Symptom

ASUS ROG AMD board, 32 GiB RAM, AMI BIOS 2.20.1271, booting legacy/CSM from a USB stick. The bootloader runs, reaches the memory map parsing, and stops:

panicked at src/bootinfo/memory_map.rs:225:18:
invalid region type 2954887168

The kernel never starts. Nothing indicates which region is at fault, nor how many there are.

What the specification requires

INT 15h AX=E820h is specified by the ACPI Specification, §15 — System Address Map Interfaces. Table 15-374 (Address Range Types) explicitly covers types the OS does not know:

Ranges marked "Reserved for future use" must be treated by OSPM as if the type returned was AddressRangeReserved.

So the specification anticipates unknown types, and mandates reserving them rather than failing. The current behaviour is non-conformant: a bootloader refuses to start on firmware that is within spec.

This is not hypothetical — Linux dealt with the same issue ("e820: Undefined type not treated as AddressRangeReserved"), some firmware emitting type 13 where SeaBIOS emits 2.

What 0.11 already does

The next major version handles this well:

// bootloader-x86_64-bios-stage-4/src/memory_descriptor.rs
fn kind(&self) -> MemoryRegionKind {
    match self.0.region_type {
        1     => MemoryRegionKind::Usable,
        other => MemoryRegionKind::UnknownBios(other),
    }
}

Neither panic nor silence: the region is not reusable, and the raw value is preserved. The proposal below carries that spirit into the constraints of 0.9.

Proposed fix

src/bootinfo/memory_map.rs, around line 219:

 impl From<E820MemoryRegion> for MemoryRegion {
     fn from(region: E820MemoryRegion) -> MemoryRegion {
         let region_type = match region.region_type {
             1 => MemoryRegionType::Usable,
             2 => MemoryRegionType::Reserved,
             3 => MemoryRegionType::AcpiReclaimable,
             4 => MemoryRegionType::AcpiNvs,
             5 => MemoryRegionType::BadMemory,
-            t => panic!("invalid region type {}", t),
+            // ACPI Specification §15, Table 15-374 (Address Range Types): ranges marked
+            // "Reserved for future use" must be treated by OSPM as if the type returned
+            // was AddressRangeReserved. Treating them as fatal makes the bootloader
+            // refuse to start on firmware that is within spec.
+            //
+            // Not reusing the region is both the safe and the conformant behaviour;
+            // `Reserved` expresses exactly that.
+            _ => MemoryRegionType::Reserved,
         };

Why Reserved rather than a variant carrying the value, as 0.11 does with UnknownBios(u32): MemoryRegionType is #[repr(C)] and crosses the boundary between bootloader and kernel, which are compiled separately. Adding a payload-carrying variant would change its representation and break the ABI for every existing kernel. On a maintenance branch that seems out of the question.

If you would rather preserve the value anyway, two options exist — a payload-free variant plus a separate field in MemoryRegion, or a counter exposed through BootInfo — but both touch the ABI and are your call, not mine.

What this fix does not address

In our case the value received is 2954887168 = 0xB0200000. That is not a region type, however exotic: the specification defines only a handful. It is an address. So there is additionally something wrong with how the map is read upstream of this code — entry size, entry count, or buffer overrun — which I have not characterised yet.

The proposed change does not fix that. It keeps the bootloader usable on conformant hardware, and turns a fatal stop into a merely unused region, which is what the specification asks for. I will keep investigating the root cause and report back.

Reproduction

  • bootloader = "0.9.34", custom x86_64 target, image produced by cargo bootimage
  • written with dd to a USB stick (SanDisk 0781:5590), 3,091,968 bytes, checksum verified
  • ASUS ROG AMD board, AMI BIOS 2.20.1271, legacy/CSM boot
  • the same binary runs fine under QEMU: the fault only shows on this real firmware, which is consistent with an E820 map that differs from SeaBIOS's
主要言語
Rust
スター
1.7k
フォーク
240
PR マージ指標
30日以内にマージされた PR はありません

環境構築

このプロジェクトの環境構築ファイルはまだ確認していません。まず README を読み、一般的な手順ははじめてのコントリビューションガイドを参照してください。

はじめの一歩

  1. issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
  2. 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
  3. リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
  4. issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。

rust-osdev/bootloader のほかの issue

rust-osdev/bootloader の issue をすべて見る

似ている issue

Rust の issue をもっと見る

新しい issue をメールで受け取る

初心者向けの GitHub issue を短くまとめたダイジェスト。