Legacy Client pooling messes tower::TraceLayer tracing
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
Valutazione
- Difficoltà
- 4/5
- Tempo stimato
- 3-5 giorni
- Idoneità per principianti
- 52/100
- Tipo di issue
- Bug
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Stato di attività
- Attiva
- Stack tecnologico
- rust
- Ambito
- networking, observability
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia in hyper-util/src/client/legacy/client.rs, in corrispondenza di connect_to, e in hyper-util/src/rt/tokio.rs, in corrispondenza della strumentazione tracing dell’executor. Riproduci una richiesta HTTP/1 tramite TraceLayer con il connection pooling abilitato, quindi esamina come lo span della richiesta viene mantenuto dal dispatcher in background. Il lavoro è completato quando gli span delle richieste terminano con la risposta invece che quando viene eliminata la connessione inattiva del pool.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Descrizione
Version
hyper 1.6.0
hyper-util 0.1.12
tower 0.5.2
tower-http 0.6.4
Platform
Linux 6.10.14-linuxkit #1 SMP Tue Apr 15 16:00:54 UTC 2025 aarch64 GNU/Linux
Description
When using tower_http::TraceLayer with hyper_util::client::legacy::Client, with HTTP/1 requests, the request spans are kept alive all the way until the underlying idle connection is disposed (90s by default). This prevents us from effectively monitoring kubernetes controller written with kube-rs (which uses this combination).
After looking deeper into it, here's what's happening:
- TraceLayer correctly creates a new span.
- Client creates a new TCP connection via send_request -> try_send_request -> connection_for -> one_connection_for -> connect_to.
- After the handshake, connect_to creates a background dispatcher task to manage the connection.
- TokioExecutor spawns that task after wrapping it with
.in_current_span(), which copies the span. - Now original request finishes, response is processed and original copy of span is dropped. This is where the span should ideally be dropped, reporting the end of the request.
- Instead, the underlying connection is moved to the pool as "idle" and the dispatcher task keeps a reference to the span. Only after the connection is disposed (90s by default), do we see the span dropped and span data reported to the OTEL server.
- We see a lot of requests with duration around 90s, which makes it hard to work with the reported metrics.
Here's the full stack trace of when the span is getting cloned
3: tracing_core::dispatcher::Dispatch::clone_span
at <index.crates.io>/tracing-core-0.1.32/src/dispatcher.rs:659:13
4: tracing::span::Span::current::{{closure}}
at <index.crates.io>/tracing-0.1.40/src/span.rs:552:26
5: tracing_core::dispatcher::get_default
at <index.crates.io>/tracing-core-0.1.32/src/dispatcher.rs:391:16
6: tracing::span::Span::current
at <index.crates.io>/tracing-0.1.40/src/span.rs:550:9
7: tracing::instrument::Instrument::in_current_span
at <index.crates.io>/tracing-0.1.40/src/instrument.rs:129:25
8: <hyper_util::rt::tokio::TokioExecutor as hyper::rt::Executor<Fut>>::execute
at <index.crates.io>/hyper-util-0.1.12/src/rt/tokio.rs:112:22
9: hyper_util::common::exec::Exec::execute
at <index.crates.io>/hyper-util-0.1.12/src/common/exec.rs:34:17
10: hyper_util::client::legacy::client::Client<C,B>::connect_to::{{closure}}::{{closure}}::{{closure}}
at <index.crates.io>/hyper-util-0.1.12/src/client/legacy/client.rs:585:37
11: <core::pin::Pin<P> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <rust-lib>/core/src/future/future.rs:124:9
12: <futures_util::future::either::Either<A,B> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/futures-util-0.3.30/src/future/either.rs:109:32
13: <F as futures_core::future::TryFuture>::try_poll
at <index.crates.io>/futures-core-0.3.30/src/future.rs:82:9
14: <futures_util::future::try_future::try_flatten::TryFlatten<Fut,<Fut as futures_core::future::TryFuture>::Ok> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/futures-util-0.3.30/src/future/try_future/try_flatten.rs:57:41
15: <futures_util::future::try_future::TryFlatten<Fut1,Fut2> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/futures-util-0.3.30/src/lib.rs:91:13
16: <futures_util::future::try_future::AndThen<Fut1,Fut2,F> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/futures-util-0.3.30/src/lib.rs:91:13
17: <futures_util::future::either::Either<A,B> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/futures-util-0.3.30/src/future/either.rs:109:32
18: <hyper_util::common::lazy::Lazy<F,R> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/hyper-util-0.1.12/src/common/lazy.rs:64:20
19: futures_util::future::future::FutureExt::poll_unpin
at <index.crates.io>/futures-util-0.3.30/src/future/future/mod.rs:558:9
20: <futures_util::future::select::Select<A,B> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/futures-util-0.3.30/src/future/select.rs:118:35
21: hyper_util::client::legacy::client::Client<C,B>::one_connection_for::{{closure}}
at <index.crates.io>/hyper-util-0.1.12/src/client/legacy/client.rs:435:49
22: hyper_util::client::legacy::client::Client<C,B>::connection_for::{{closure}}
at <index.crates.io>/hyper-util-0.1.12/src/client/legacy/client.rs:386:61
23: hyper_util::client::legacy::client::Client<C,B>::try_send_request::{{closure}}
at <index.crates.io>/hyper-util-0.1.12/src/client/legacy/client.rs:281:14
24: hyper_util::client::legacy::client::Client<C,B>::send_request::{{closure}}
at <index.crates.io>/hyper-util-0.1.12/src/client/legacy/client.rs:249:70
25: <hyper_util::client::legacy::client::ResponseFuture as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/hyper-util-0.1.12/src/client/legacy/client.rs:704:9
26: <F as futures_core::future::TryFuture>::try_poll
at <index.crates.io>/futures-core-0.3.30/src/future.rs:82:9
27: <futures_util::future::try_future::into_future::IntoFuture<Fut> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/futures-util-0.3.30/src/future/try_future/into_future.rs:34:9
28: <futures_util::future::future::map::Map<Fut,F> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/futures-util-0.3.30/src/future/future/map.rs:55:37
29: <futures_util::future::future::Map<Fut,F> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/futures-util-0.3.30/src/lib.rs:91:13
30: <futures_util::future::try_future::MapErr<Fut,F> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/futures-util-0.3.30/src/lib.rs:91:13
31: <tower::util::map_err::MapErrFuture<F,N> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/tower-0.5.2/src/macros.rs:38:17
32: <tower_http::trace::future::ResponseFuture<Fut,C,OnResponseT,OnBodyChunkT,OnEosT,OnFailureT> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/tower-http-0.6.4/src/trace/future.rs:64:29
33: <tower::filter::future::AsyncResponseFuture<P,S,Request> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/tower-0.5.2/src/filter/future.rs:93:28
34: <tower::util::either::EitherResponseFuture<A,B> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/tower-0.5.2/src/util/either.rs:85:42
35: <tower::util::either::EitherResponseFuture<A,B> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/tower-0.5.2/src/util/either.rs:84:41
36: <tower_http::map_response_body::ResponseFuture<Fut,F> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/tower-http-0.6.4/src/map_response_body.rs:182:26
37: <core::pin::Pin<P> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <rust-lib>/core/src/future/future.rs:124:9
38: <tower_http::map_response_body::ResponseFuture<Fut,F> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/tower-http-0.6.4/src/map_response_body.rs:182:26
39: <F as futures_core::future::TryFuture>::try_poll
at <index.crates.io>/futures-core-0.3.30/src/future.rs:82:9
40: <futures_util::future::try_future::into_future::IntoFuture<Fut> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/futures-util-0.3.30/src/future/try_future/into_future.rs:34:9
41: <futures_util::future::future::map::Map<Fut,F> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/futures-util-0.3.30/src/future/future/map.rs:55:37
42: <futures_util::future::future::Map<Fut,F> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/futures-util-0.3.30/src/lib.rs:91:13
43: <futures_util::future::try_future::MapErr<Fut,F> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/futures-util-0.3.30/src/lib.rs:91:13
44: <tower::util::map_err::MapErrFuture<F,N> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/tower-0.5.2/src/macros.rs:38:17
45: <core::pin::Pin<P> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <rust-lib>/core/src/future/future.rs:124:9
46: <tower::buffer::future::ResponseFuture<F> as core::future::future::Future>::poll
at <index.crates.io>/tower-0.5.2/src/buffer/future.rs:75:59
47: kube_client::client::Client::send::{{closure}}
at <index.crates.io>/kube-client-1.0.0/src/client/mod.rs:213:14
48: kube_client::client::Client::request_text::{{closure}}
at <index.crates.io>/kube-client-1.0.0/src/client/mod.rs:285:54
49: kube_client::client::Client::request::{{closure}}
at <index.crates.io>/kube-client-1.0.0/src/client/mod.rs:274:47
50: kube_client::client::Client::apiserver_version::{{closure}}
at <index.crates.io>/kube-client-1.0.0/src/client/mod.rs:410:10
One option to resolve this is to switch off the tracing feature, but it's a bit hard to do in our case because we depend on hyper_utils via kube-client - kube crates. Plus it looks like the opposite direction of what we want to do (we want more tracing, not less).
The other option is to switch off the pooling. Not great as well.
I wonder if you have any ideas of how to maybe make it smarter than just .in_current_span()? Conceptually it seems to be mixing request lifecycle and connection lifecycle, which will always be different when pooling is involved.
Thank you!
- Lingua principale
- Rust
- Stelle
- 16.3k
- Fork
- 1.8k
- Merge medio
- 4g 10h
- PR unite (30g)
- 21
Preparare l'ambiente
- Nessun Dockerfile né file Docker Compose
- Nessun modello di pull request
- Leggi la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Altre issue di hyperium/hyper
-
C-feature
Difficoltà 1/5 Meno di un'ora Idoneità per principianti 65/100
hyperium/hyper#2652 · 4 reazioni ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
Write a HIP for `Body::poll_progress()`Forse già presa @cratelyn l’ha presa 1 giorno fa. ApertaA-body B-rfc C-feature
hyperium/hyper#4228 · 1 assegnatario ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
Difficoltà 3/5 1-2 giorni Idoneità per principianti 74/100
hyperium/hyper#4211 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
Upgraded HTTP/2 CONNECT streams cannot be reset, so a failed tunnel looks like a clean closeForse già presa @jeremyjpj0916 l’ha presa 11 giorni fa. Aperta
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 55/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
hyper-util legacy client: an HTTP/1 request can hang forever when the connection closes while the request is being queuedForse già presa @akasakariko l’ha presa 4 giorni fa. Aperta
Difficoltà 4/5 3-5 giorni Idoneità per principianti 62/100
hyperium/hyper#4202 · 1 commento ·
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
Tutte le issue di hyperium/hyper
Issue simili
-
defect
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 74/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 74/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 82/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 2 giorni
-
enhancement user-priority/P3
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 62/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno
-
Difficoltà 2/5 1-3 ore Idoneità per principianti 70/100
I maintainer di solito rispondono entro 1 giorno