Hacktoberfest 2026: le issue che i maintainer hanno segnato per ottobre, aperte e adatte ai principianti. Sfoglia le issue Hacktoberfest

hyper-util legacy client: an HTTP/1 request can hang forever when the connection closes while the request is being queued

Aperta
#4,202 0 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
4/5
Tempo stimato
3-5 giorni
Idoneità per principianti
62/100
Tipo di issue
Bug
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Stato di attività
Attiva
Stack tecnologico
rust

Direzione di ricerca

Start at hyper_util::client::legacy::Client::try_send_request and PoolClient::poll_ready, then inspect the HTTP/1 dispatcher close path described in the issue. Use the deterministic regression tests in the linked hyper-util patch tree as the starting test reference. Done means a dispatcher close releases the held sender and the request completes with the existing retry or cancellation behavior instead of hanging.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

Summary

hyper_util::client::legacy::Client can leave an HTTP/1 request future pending
forever. This happens when the pooled connection's dispatcher closes (the peer
sends RST, or a FIN on an idle keep-alive connection) at the moment the request
is being enqueued. No error is returned and the request is not retried. The
caller sees a hang that ends only when its own timeout fires.

Versions: hyper 1.9.0, hyper-util 0.1.20, tokio 1.52.3. hyper and hyper-util
master have the same code.

Mechanism

  1. Client::try_send_request checks out an HTTP/1 Pooled<PoolClient> and
    calls pooled.try_send_request(req).await. It holds pooled across the
    await.
  2. hyper::client::dispatch::Sender::try_send calls tokio's
    UnboundedSender::send, which works in two steps:
    inc_num_messages() checks the closed bit and reserves a slot, then
    chan.send() publishes the value.
  3. Suppose the requester is preempted between those two steps while the
    connection task sees the peer's reset. proto::h1::dispatch::Client::recv_msg(Err)
    finds no callback. It calls rx.close(), and then rx.try_recv(). tokio's
    recv returns Pending while a send is in progress (the semaphore is not
    idle), and try_recv uses now_or_never, so it returns None. The
    dispatcher returns Err, and hyper-util logs
    client connection error: ... ConnectionReset. On a graceful FIN, the
    dispatcher finishes Ok instead and drops its receiver.
  4. Dropping UnboundedReceiver drains only published values.
  5. The requester resumes and publishes into a channel nobody will read.
    Envelope::drop would fail the callback with Canceled and give back the
    request. But it runs only when the channel is dropped, and the channel
    stays alive while pooled holds its only sender. pooled is held until the
    response arrives, and the response never arrives.

tokio documents that a value can be sent after the receiver is dropped
(tokio-rs/tokio#7714, tokio-rs/tokio#8278).

Evidence

In CI, a server that accepts a connection and immediately resets it
(SO_LINGER=0) produces this trace:

hyper_util::client::legacy::client: connection is ready
hyper_util::client::legacy::pool: checkout dropped
<server accepts, resets>
hyper_util::client::legacy::client: client connection error: hyper::Error(Io, Os { code: 104, kind: ConnectionReset, message: "Connection reset by peer" })
hyper_util::client::legacy::client: sending connection error to error channel
<nothing until the caller's 5 s timeout>

The client connection error line appears only when the dispatcher had no
callback and try_recv found nothing. Every other ordering fails the request
in microseconds. The hang needs a preemption inside a window of a few
instructions, so it shows up only on loaded, many-threaded runners. We saw it
five times in eight days of CI across nine variants of that test, and never in
local repetition.

Proposed fix (hyper-util)

Do not keep holding the only HTTP/1 sender after its dispatcher has closed.
While awaiting the response, try_send_request also polls
PoolClient::poll_ready for HTTP/1 connections:

  • Err (the want taker was canceled, which happens on rx.close() and on
    receiver drop): capture is_reused() and conn_info, then drop pooled.
    That drops the last sender. The channel destructor then drops any stranded
    envelope, and hyper fails the callback with Canceled plus the request. The
    existing Retryable path then retries a reused connection or returns
    Canceled for a fresh one, which is exactly what happens when the dispatcher
    does see the queued request.
  • Ok (the dispatcher asked for more work after the request was published):
    it saw the request, so stop watching.

The response future is polled first on every wake, so a delivered response or
error always wins. The change does not allocate and changes no API.
The patch we currently carry against hyper-util 0.1.20 is here:
https://github.com/ferrum-edge/ferrum-edge/blob/d1136ab60f0c74221bae49cc224b265bdcb24575/docs/upstream-hyper-util-patches/001-release-h1-sender-on-dispatch-close/hyper-util-release-h1-sender-on-dispatch-close.patch
(with deterministic regression tests in the same vendored tree). We are happy to open a PR if this direction looks right.

An alternative fix in hyper: after rx.close(), keep the dispatcher polling
rx until it returns Ready(None), and cancel anything that arrives. Do the
same before dropping the receiver on a graceful shutdown. That fixes every
SendRequest user, including code that drives client::conn::http1 directly
and holds its sender while waiting. But it keeps the connection task alive
after close until the preempted sender runs again.

Lingua principale
Rust
Stelle
16.3k
Fork
1.8k
Merge medio
2g 20h
PR unite (30g)
14

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di hyperium/hyper

Tutte le issue di hyperium/hyper

Issue simili

Altre issue su Rust

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.