Hacktoberfest 2026 : les issues que les mainteneurs ont marquées pour octobre, ouvertes et accessibles aux débutants. Parcourir les issues Hacktoberfest

False Negative: CompareIdenticalValues.ql misses self-comparisons once the same value is routed through aliases or tiny helper methods.

Ouverte
#21,535 1 commentaire 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub

Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.

Évaluation

Difficulté
4/5
Temps estimé
3-5 jours
Accessibilité débutants
48/100
Type d'issue
Bug
Clarté
Clairement spécifiée
Activité
Calme
Stack technique
java
Domaine
security

Piste de recherche

Commencez par Likely Bugs/Comparison/CompareIdenticalValues.ql, puis examinez PosCase2_Var1.java, PosCase2_Var3.java et PosCase3_Var3.java afin de comprendre les cas signalés d’alias, de méthodes auxiliaires et d’expressions répétées. Le travail est terminé lorsque le checker reconnaît les comparaisons indiquées comme redondantes ou suspectes sans modifier les autres comportements.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.

Description

Version
codeql 2.24.3

Checker

  • Checker id: Likely Bugs/Comparison/CompareIdenticalValues.ql
  • Checker description: Detects comparisons where the left and right operands are identical in value, such as comparing the same variable, literal, or structurally equal expressions.

Description of the false negative

All three samples are still comparing a value against itself. The only differences are that the value is first copied through an alias or passed through a helper method that preserves the same expression on both sides.

That should still be enough for Likely Bugs/Comparison/CompareIdenticalValues.ql to report the comparison as redundant or suspicious.

Affected test cases

PosCase2_Var1.java

y != x, ref == obj, and val >= h.value all compare equivalent values. The aliasing changes syntax, not semantics.

// Comparison with identical variable accesses should be flagged as identical operands.
package scensct.var.pos;

public class PosCase2_Var1 {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        int x = 10;
        int y = x; // alias
        boolean b1 = y != x; // still same variable value
        
        Object obj = new Object();
        Object ref = obj;
        boolean b2 = ref == obj; // same reference
        
        Holder h = new Holder();
        int val = h.value;
        boolean b3 = val >= h.value; // same field value
    }
    
    static class Holder {
        int value = 5;
    }
}
PosCase2_Var3.java

The helper calls receive identical arguments on both sides of the comparison, so the resulting expressions are still identical.

// Comparison with identical variable accesses should be flagged as identical operands.
package scensct.var.pos;

public class PosCase2_Var3 {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        int x = 10;
        boolean b1 = compareNotEqual(x, x);
        
        Object obj = new Object();
        boolean b2 = compareEqual(obj, obj);
        
        Holder h = new Holder();
        boolean b3 = compareGreaterOrEqual(h.value, h.value);
    }
    
    static boolean compareNotEqual(int a, int b) {
        return a != b;
    }
    
    static boolean compareEqual(Object a, Object b) {
        return a == b;
    }
    
    static boolean compareGreaterOrEqual(int a, int b) {
        return a >= b;
    }
    
    static class Holder {
        int value = 5;
    }
}
PosCase3_Var3.java

Each comparison applies the same pure helper to the same inputs on both sides. That is still a self-comparison.

// Comparison with structurally identical binary expressions should be flagged as identical operands.
package scensct.var.pos;

public class PosCase3_Var3 {
    // Variant 3: Extract identical expressions to a helper method
    private static int addOne(int n) {
        return n + 1;
    }
    private static int multiply(int m, int n) {
        return m * n;
    }
    private static int subtractTwo(int n) {
        return n - 2;
    }
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        int x = 5;
        int a = 2, b = 3;
        boolean b1 = addOne(x) > addOne(x);
        boolean b2 = multiply(a, b) == multiply(a, b);
        boolean b3 = subtractTwo(x) <= subtractTwo(x);
    }
}

Cause analysis

The misses suggest that Likely Bugs/Comparison/CompareIdenticalValues.ql is reasoning mostly at the surface-expression level. Once the same value is routed through a local alias or a small pure helper, the query stops recognizing that both sides of the comparison are still equivalent.

For developers, these are not edge cases. Aliases and tiny wrappers are common, and they do not make a self-comparison any less suspicious.

Langage dominant
CodeQL
Étoiles
10.1k
Forks
2.1k
Merge moyen
2 j 16 h
PR mergées (30 j)
143

Guide de contribution

Ouvrir le guide de contribution

Par où commencer

  1. Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
  2. Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
  3. Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
  4. Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.

Autres issues de github/codeql

Toutes les issues de github/codeql

Issues similaires

Plus d'issues Security

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.