chore(ci): check the RustSec advisory database on a schedule, so a new advisory is found on main and not on someone's pull request
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
Évaluation
- Difficulté
- 4/5
- Temps estimé
- 3-5 jours
- Accessibilité débutants
- 56/100
- Type d'issue
- Fonctionnalité
- Clarté
- Clairement spécifiée
- Activité
- Active
- Stack technique
- github-actions, rust
- Domaine
- ci-cd, documentation, security
Piste de recherche
Read .github/workflows/ci.yml for the existing deny job and .github/workflows/flake-hunt.yml for the schedule precedent, then review deny.toml and the supply-chain section of ADR-0101. Add a scheduled, manually dispatchable advisory check and document its failure handling in docs/src/architecture/cicd.md and docs/src/contributing/standards.md; verify the documented control by removing the RUSTSEC-2023-0071 ignore on a throwaway branch and confirming the run names the advisory.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Description
Context
The deny job (added by #87, closing #40) runs cargo deny --locked check, which fetches the RustSec advisory database on every run, and it is in gate's needs, the only required check. So a newly published advisory turns the job red, and every Rust pull request with it, with no change to the code. Nothing looks at the database between pull requests, so the first person to find out is whoever happens to open one.
This is not hypothetical. When deny.toml was written, seven advisories already failed on main, and two of them (RUSTSEC-2026-0385 and -0387) had been published on 2026-10-23, three days after #40 was filed on 2026-10-20. They were found only because that work ran against the live database.
ci.yml triggers on pull_request, merge_group, push to main and workflow_dispatch. The only scheduled workflow is flake-hunt.yml (weekly).
Problem
- A new advisory is first seen on an unrelated pull request, which is then red for a reason it did not cause.
maincan be red-in-waiting for as long as nobody pushes.
Proposal
- A scheduled workflow that runs
cargo deny --locked check advisoriesagainstmain, with the same pinnedcargo-denyand the samedeny.toml, and fails visibly when an advisory appears. Decide how it tells someone: a failing scheduled run that watchers are notified of, or one tracking issue it opens and updates. Daily is probably right for something time-sensitive;flake-hunt.ymlis weekly. - Keep it out of
gate: it reports onmain, andgateis about the pull request in front of it. - Decide whether the pull-request
denyjob should keep the advisories check. Keeping it means an unrelated advisory blocks every pull request until it is fixed (today's behaviour, fail-closed). Dropping it tolicenses bans sourcesdecouples pull requests from drift but leaves advisories to the schedule alone. The schedule does not change which of those you pick; it only makes the warning arrive onmainfirst. - Note that
flake-hunt.ymlrecords that GitHub disables scheduled workflows in a public repository after 60 days without repository activity.
Acceptance criteria
- A scheduled workflow exists (actions pinned by SHA,
permissionsno wider than it needs) and can also be started byworkflow_dispatch. - The control: on a throwaway branch with the RUSTSEC-2023-0071 ignore deleted from
deny.toml, a dispatched run fails and names that advisory (as the throwaway pull request #88 did for the pull-request job). - What happens when it fails, and who is told, is written in
docs/src/architecture/cicd.md. That page anddocs/src/contributing/standards.md("Decided, and built only in part") now say there is no scheduled check of the advisory database; update both.
References
#40, #87; deny.toml; the deny job in .github/workflows/ci.yml; .github/workflows/flake-hunt.yml (the schedule precedent and the 60-day note); ADR-0101 (.agents/plans/contrail/adrs/ci/0101-ci-supply-chain.md); docs/src/architecture/cicd.md, "Permissions and supply chain".
- Langage dominant
- Rust
- Étoiles
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Merge moyen
- 1 h 35 min
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 67
Préparer son environnement
- Aucun Dockerfile ni fichier Docker Compose
- Aucun modèle de pull request
- Lire le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Autres issues de aRustyDev/thrust
-
area:process prio:p1 type:security
Difficulté 4/5 3-5 jours Accessibilité débutants 48/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
area:process bug prio:p1
Difficulté 4/5 3-5 jours Accessibilité débutants 38/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
area:process prio:p1
Difficulté 4/5 3-5 jours Accessibilité débutants 55/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
area:process prio:p1
Difficulté 4/5 1-2 jours Accessibilité débutants 55/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
area:app prio:p0 review:fable-2026-10-19
Difficulté 5/5 Plus d'une semaine Accessibilité débutants 25/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
Toutes les issues de aRustyDev/thrust
Issues similaires
-
bug good first issue help wanted linux macos testing
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 85/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
area: app type: test
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 82/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
bug priority: medium
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 78/100
storytold/photocraft#12706 · 1 commentaire ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 68/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 85/100
IngvarConsulting/unica#2822 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour