chore(ci): pin the Rust toolchain, so a clippy or rustfmt release cannot turn lint red with no code change
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
Évaluation
- Difficulté
- 4/5
- Temps estimé
- 3-5 jours
- Accessibilité débutants
- 55/100
- Type d'issue
- Refactorisation
- Clarté
- Clairement spécifiée
- Activité
- Active
- Stack technique
- github-actions, rust, wasm
- Domaine
- build-system, ci-cd
Piste de recherche
Start with .github/actions/setup-rust/action.yml, scripts/rs, .github/scripts/classify-changes.sh, and docs/src/architecture/cicd.md to trace how CI, local commands, and documentation select Rust. Check how the Worker wasm32 build uses worker-build and wrangler, then verify the acceptance criteria, including the throwaway pin-change control. Done means one exact version drives repository commands and CI, jobs report the compiler version, and docs/ explains the bump process.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Description
Context
CI installs the Rust toolchain as stable (.github/actions/setup-rust/action.yml:34, through dtolnay/rust-toolchain). There is no rust-toolchain or rust-toolchain.toml file, and no rust-version in any manifest. scripts/rs also hard-codes stable (scripts/rs:20, rustup which --toolchain stable rustc). Locally, Homebrew's cargo 1.98.1 comes first on PATH while rustup's stable is 1.99.0 (its header records this, measured 2026-10-18), so a bare cargo and scripts/rs cargo are different compilers.
The lint job added by #87 runs cargo clippy ... -- -D warnings. Clippy adds lints in most releases, so on a floating toolchain a new stable release will eventually turn lint red with no change to the code. No such release has happened yet: the 47 warnings that #87 had to fix first were there because clippy had never run in CI, not because a release moved. That is why this is a risk to remove now, not an incident to fix.
Problem
- A rustc, clippy or rustfmt release breaks
lint(and can changefmt --check) on whichever pull request lands next, and onmain. - CI and a developer's machine can disagree about which lints exist.
- There is no single place that says which compiler this repository is built and tested with.
Proposal
- A
rust-toolchain.tomlnaming an exact version, with the components (clippy,rustfmt) and thewasm32-unknown-unknowntarget. Decide how CI installs it (read the version from the file, or let rustup honour the file) so the version lives in one place. - Make
scripts/rsfollow the pin instead ofstable. - Write down how the pin is bumped. Dependabot does not bump
rustc, so this is a deliberate, small pull request (or a scheduled one): bump, runcargo clippy --fixfor new lints, and land them together, instead of finding them on an unrelated pull request. - Check it against the other pins that move with the compiler:
worker-build0.8.7 and wrangler 4.151.2 (both in thesetup-rustaction) and the Worker's wasm32 build. - Keep it separate from an MSRV (
rust-version), which is a different question and not set today.
classify-changes.sh already treats a path starting rust-toolchain as Rust, so a change to the pin runs the Rust jobs.
Acceptance criteria
- One file defines the version, and CI,
scripts/rsand a plaincargoin the repository all use it. Each CI job prints therustc --versionit used. - The control: change the pin to a different version on a throwaway branch, and the jobs report that version (and nothing else moves).
- The bump procedure is written down in
docs/. -
docs/src/architecture/cicd.md("the Rust toolchain isstable, not pinned, so a new clippy or rustfmt release can faillint") is updated to say what is pinned and how to bump it.
References
#40, #87; .github/actions/setup-rust/action.yml; scripts/rs; .github/scripts/classify-changes.sh; docs/src/architecture/cicd.md, "Permissions and supply chain".
- Langage dominant
- Rust
- Étoiles
- 0
- Forks
- 0
- Merge moyen
- 1 h 35 min
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 67
Préparer son environnement
- Aucun Dockerfile ni fichier Docker Compose
- Aucun modèle de pull request
- Lire le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Autres issues de aRustyDev/thrust
-
area:process prio:p1 type:security
Difficulté 4/5 3-5 jours Accessibilité débutants 48/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
area:process bug prio:p1
Difficulté 4/5 3-5 jours Accessibilité débutants 38/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
area:process prio:p1
Difficulté 4/5 1-2 jours Accessibilité débutants 55/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
area:process prio:p1
Difficulté 4/5 3-5 jours Accessibilité débutants 56/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
area:app prio:p0 review:fable-2026-10-19
Difficulté 5/5 Plus d'une semaine Accessibilité débutants 25/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
Toutes les issues de aRustyDev/thrust
Issues similaires
-
bug good first issue help wanted linux macos testing
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 85/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
area: app type: test
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 82/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
bug priority: medium
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 78/100
storytold/photocraft#12706 · 1 commentaire ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 68/100
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour
-
Difficulté 2/5 1-3 heures Accessibilité débutants 85/100
IngvarConsulting/unica#2822 ·
Les mainteneurs répondent en général sous 1 jour